Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[PATCH\s+7\/7\]\s+XFS\:\s+don\'t\s+use\s+vnodes\s+where\s+unnecessary\s*$/: 9 ]

Total 9 documents matching your query.

1. [PATCH 7/7] XFS: don't use vnodes where unnecessary (score: 1)
Author: Dave Chinner <david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 14 Aug 2008 17:14:43 +1000
Not that we have a combined xfs and linux inode, we can clean up the use of linux indoes in several places. We can now check for the xfs inode being in the reclaim state rather than whether the linux
/archives/xfs/2008-08/msg00246.html (19,066 bytes)

2. Re: [PATCH 7/7] XFS: don't use vnodes where unnecessary (score: 1)
Author: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 14 Aug 2008 16:10:22 -0400
This should not be inode_refed, no? :) These changes really need to be folded into the previous patch for bisectability reasons.. Just use is_bad_inode directly. (Also in a few other places) Maybe n
/archives/xfs/2008-08/msg00258.html (11,476 bytes)

3. Re: [PATCH 7/7] XFS: don't use vnodes where unnecessary (score: 1)
Author: Dave Chinner <david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 18 Aug 2008 10:42:09 +1000
Yeah ;) Right - this was catching all this bits that I missed in the previous patch ;) Will do. Right now, we either get a reference or an ilock to prevent reclaim from freeing it. The case ofthe vno
/archives/xfs/2008-08/msg00286.html (13,016 bytes)

4. [PATCH 7/7] XFS: don't use vnodes where unnecessary (score: 1)
Author: xx>
Date: Thu, 14 Aug 2008 17:14:43 +1000
Not that we have a combined xfs and linux inode, we can clean up the use of linux indoes in several places. We can now check for the xfs inode being in the reclaim state rather than whether the linux
/archives/xfs/2008-08/msg00694.html (19,066 bytes)

5. Re: [PATCH 7/7] XFS: don't use vnodes where unnecessary (score: 1)
Author: xx>
Date: Thu, 14 Aug 2008 16:10:22 -0400
This should not be inode_refed, no? :) These changes really need to be folded into the previous patch for bisectability reasons.. Just use is_bad_inode directly. (Also in a few other places) Maybe n
/archives/xfs/2008-08/msg00706.html (11,476 bytes)

6. Re: [PATCH 7/7] XFS: don't use vnodes where unnecessary (score: 1)
Author: xx>
Date: Mon, 18 Aug 2008 10:42:09 +1000
Yeah ;) Right - this was catching all this bits that I missed in the previous patch ;) Will do. Right now, we either get a reference or an ilock to prevent reclaim from freeing it. The case ofthe vno
/archives/xfs/2008-08/msg00734.html (13,016 bytes)

7. [PATCH 7/7] XFS: don't use vnodes where unnecessary (score: 1)
Author: Dave Chinner <david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 14 Aug 2008 17:14:43 +1000
Not that we have a combined xfs and linux inode, we can clean up the use of linux indoes in several places. We can now check for the xfs inode being in the reclaim state rather than whether the linux
/archives/xfs/2008-08/msg01142.html (19,160 bytes)

8. Re: [PATCH 7/7] XFS: don't use vnodes where unnecessary (score: 1)
Author: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 14 Aug 2008 16:10:22 -0400
This should not be inode_refed, no? :) These changes really need to be folded into the previous patch for bisectability reasons.. Just use is_bad_inode directly. (Also in a few other places) Maybe n
/archives/xfs/2008-08/msg01154.html (11,617 bytes)

9. Re: [PATCH 7/7] XFS: don't use vnodes where unnecessary (score: 1)
Author: Dave Chinner <david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 18 Aug 2008 10:42:09 +1000
Yeah ;) Right - this was catching all this bits that I missed in the previous patch ;) Will do. Right now, we either get a reference or an ilock to prevent reclaim from freeing it. The case ofthe vno
/archives/xfs/2008-08/msg01182.html (13,170 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu