Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[PATCH\s+6\/9\]\s+irda\:\s+use\s+sock\s+slab\s+cache\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[PATCH\s+6\/9\]\s+irda\:\s+use\s+sock\s+slab\s+cache\s*$/: 16 ]

Total 16 documents matching your query.

1. he (score: 1): Author: Carvalho de Melo <acme@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Thu, 20 Jan 2005 00:04:31 -0200; equired to get rid of sk_protinfo an; /archives/netdev/2005-01/msg00884.html (14,281 bytes)
2. cache (score: 1): Author: Carvalho de Melo <acme@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Wed, 19 Jan 2005 18:16:07 -0800; t rid of sk_protinfo and to introduc; /archives/netdev/2005-01/msg00885.html (10,006 bytes)
3. [PATCH]: was Re: LLTX and netif_stop_queue (score: 1): Author: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Thu, 20 Jan 2005 01:47:10 -0200; t may take a while before I test that. I'm just curious about; /archives/netdev/2005-01/msg00888.html (10,821 bytes)
4. [PATCH]: was Re: LLTX and netif_stop_queue (score: 1): Author: er" <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Thu, 20 Jan 2005 08:54:54 +0000; ll be c; /archives/netdev/2005-01/msg00896.html (9,667 bytes)
5. FC] batched tc to improve change throughput (score: 1): Author: @xxxxxxxxx>; Date: Thu, 20 Jan 2005 12:55:45 -0200; 0 0 0 0 5 0 537114631 537 0 0 0 45; /archives/netdev/2005-01/msg00904.html (11,996 bytes)
6. t (score: 1): Author: af <tgraf@xxxxxxx>; Date: Thu, 20 Jan 2005 13:20:49 -0200; ould be able to meet the layout requ; /archives/netdev/2005-01/msg00905.html (15,600 bytes)
7. ad v2: Add hardware assist for IPSEC crypto (score: 1): Author: ephen Hemminger <shemminger@xxxxxxxx>; Date: Thu, 20 Jan 2005 09:25:22 -0800; h yet. Tried very hard to do so. I'; /archives/netdev/2005-01/msg00915.html (12,339 bytes)
8. [PATCH]: was Re: LLTX and netif_stop_queue (score: 1): Author: y.guthrie@xxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Thu, 20 Jan 2005 19:08:06 -0200; rDA. I just say that when people use IrDA, they are likely to use few sockets (as oppo; /archives/netdev/2005-01/msg00917.html (10,805 bytes)
9. [PATCH 6/9] irda: use sock slab cache (score: 1): Author: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Thu, 20 Jan 2005 00:04:31 -0200; Hi David, Jean, Please read the log in the patch. Regards, - Arnaldo == ChangeSet@xxxxxx, 2005-01-19 23:04:52-02:00, acme@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx [IRDA] use a private slab cache for socks Required to; /archives/netdev/2005-01/msg02374.html (14,174 bytes)
10. Re: [PATCH 6/9] irda: use sock slab cache (score: 1): Author: Jean Tourrilhes <jt@xxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Wed, 19 Jan 2005 18:16:07 -0800; I don't have anything against this patch, as it looks clean and straightforward. Stephen might have something to say. I'm way behind, so it may take a while before I test that. I'm just curious about; /archives/netdev/2005-01/msg02375.html (10,088 bytes)
11. Re: [PATCH 6/9] irda: use sock slab cache (score: 1): Author: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Thu, 20 Jan 2005 01:47:10 -0200; Jean Tourrilhes escreveu: I'm just curious about the overhead of adding a specific slab for IrDA sockets. Most users never create any (using IrCOMM), or maximum one (using Obex), so it's not like it; /archives/netdev/2005-01/msg02378.html (10,678 bytes)
12. Re: [PATCH 6/9] irda: use sock slab cache (score: 1): Author: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Thu, 20 Jan 2005 08:54:54 +0000; But as Jean sais this type of socket is used very little, as are a few other probably (raw, pfkey?), so maybe those should just use kmalloc + kfree instead of their own slab?; /archives/netdev/2005-01/msg02386.html (9,767 bytes)
13. Re: [PATCH 6/9] irda: use sock slab cache (score: 1): Author: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Thu, 20 Jan 2005 12:55:45 -0200; I'm just curious about the overhead of adding a specific slab for IrDA sockets. Most users never create any (using IrCOMM), or maximum one (using Obex), so it's not like it will get a lot of use (ex; /archives/netdev/2005-01/msg02394.html (11,857 bytes)
14. Re: [PATCH 6/9] irda: use sock slab cache (score: 1): Author: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Thu, 20 Jan 2005 13:20:49 -0200; Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo escreveu: Christoph Hellwig escreveu: I'm just curious about the overhead of adding a specific slab for IrDA sockets. Most users never create any (using IrCOMM), or maximum o; /archives/netdev/2005-01/msg02395.html (15,177 bytes)
15. Re: [PATCH 6/9] irda: use sock slab cache (score: 1): Author: Jean Tourrilhes <jt@xxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Thu, 20 Jan 2005 09:25:22 -0800; Just to clarify, but I think you already got this nuance. I was not talking about the frequency of people using IrDA. I just say that when people use IrDA, they are likely to use few sockets (as oppo; /archives/netdev/2005-01/msg02405.html (12,555 bytes)
16. Re: [PATCH 6/9] irda: use sock slab cache (score: 1): Author: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Thu, 20 Jan 2005 19:08:06 -0200; stage should be, the protocols will just use (IRDA for the example): Can't we just transition IrDA sockets to "future", rather than "transitional". This way we are done, and no longer need to worry; /archives/netdev/2005-01/msg02407.html (11,035 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 16
Page: [1]