Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[PATCH\s+6\/9\]\s+irda\:\s+use\s+sock\s+slab\s+cache\s*$/: 16 ]

Total 16 documents matching your query.

1. he (score: 1)
Author: Carvalho de Melo <acme@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 20 Jan 2005 00:04:31 -0200
equired to get rid of sk_protinfo an
/archives/netdev/2005-01/msg00884.html (14,281 bytes)

2. cache (score: 1)
Author: Carvalho de Melo <acme@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 19 Jan 2005 18:16:07 -0800
t rid of sk_protinfo and to introduc
/archives/netdev/2005-01/msg00885.html (10,006 bytes)

3. [PATCH]: was Re: LLTX and netif_stop_queue (score: 1)
Author: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 20 Jan 2005 01:47:10 -0200
t may take a while before I test that. I'm just curious about
/archives/netdev/2005-01/msg00888.html (10,821 bytes)

4. [PATCH]: was Re: LLTX and netif_stop_queue (score: 1)
Author: er" <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 20 Jan 2005 08:54:54 +0000
ll be c
/archives/netdev/2005-01/msg00896.html (9,667 bytes)

5. FC] batched tc to improve change throughput (score: 1)
Author: @xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 20 Jan 2005 12:55:45 -0200
0 0 0 0 5 0 537114631 537 0 0 0 45
/archives/netdev/2005-01/msg00904.html (11,996 bytes)

6. t (score: 1)
Author: af <tgraf@xxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 20 Jan 2005 13:20:49 -0200
ould be able to meet the layout requ
/archives/netdev/2005-01/msg00905.html (15,600 bytes)

7. ad v2: Add hardware assist for IPSEC crypto (score: 1)
Author: ephen Hemminger <shemminger@xxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 20 Jan 2005 09:25:22 -0800
h yet. Tried very hard to do so. I'
/archives/netdev/2005-01/msg00915.html (12,339 bytes)

8. [PATCH]: was Re: LLTX and netif_stop_queue (score: 1)
Author: y.guthrie@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 20 Jan 2005 19:08:06 -0200
rDA. I just say that when people use IrDA, they are likely to use few sockets (as oppo
/archives/netdev/2005-01/msg00917.html (10,805 bytes)

9. [PATCH 6/9] irda: use sock slab cache (score: 1)
Author: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 20 Jan 2005 00:04:31 -0200
Hi David, Jean, Please read the log in the patch. Regards, - Arnaldo == ChangeSet@xxxxxx, 2005-01-19 23:04:52-02:00, acme@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx [IRDA] use a private slab cache for socks Required to
/archives/netdev/2005-01/msg02374.html (14,174 bytes)

10. Re: [PATCH 6/9] irda: use sock slab cache (score: 1)
Author: Jean Tourrilhes <jt@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 19 Jan 2005 18:16:07 -0800
I don't have anything against this patch, as it looks clean and straightforward. Stephen might have something to say. I'm way behind, so it may take a while before I test that. I'm just curious about
/archives/netdev/2005-01/msg02375.html (10,088 bytes)

11. Re: [PATCH 6/9] irda: use sock slab cache (score: 1)
Author: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 20 Jan 2005 01:47:10 -0200
Jean Tourrilhes escreveu: I'm just curious about the overhead of adding a specific slab for IrDA sockets. Most users never create any (using IrCOMM), or maximum one (using Obex), so it's not like it
/archives/netdev/2005-01/msg02378.html (10,678 bytes)

12. Re: [PATCH 6/9] irda: use sock slab cache (score: 1)
Author: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 20 Jan 2005 08:54:54 +0000
But as Jean sais this type of socket is used very little, as are a few other probably (raw, pfkey?), so maybe those should just use kmalloc + kfree instead of their own slab?
/archives/netdev/2005-01/msg02386.html (9,767 bytes)

13. Re: [PATCH 6/9] irda: use sock slab cache (score: 1)
Author: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 20 Jan 2005 12:55:45 -0200
I'm just curious about the overhead of adding a specific slab for IrDA sockets. Most users never create any (using IrCOMM), or maximum one (using Obex), so it's not like it will get a lot of use (ex
/archives/netdev/2005-01/msg02394.html (11,857 bytes)

14. Re: [PATCH 6/9] irda: use sock slab cache (score: 1)
Author: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 20 Jan 2005 13:20:49 -0200
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo escreveu: Christoph Hellwig escreveu: I'm just curious about the overhead of adding a specific slab for IrDA sockets. Most users never create any (using IrCOMM), or maximum o
/archives/netdev/2005-01/msg02395.html (15,177 bytes)

15. Re: [PATCH 6/9] irda: use sock slab cache (score: 1)
Author: Jean Tourrilhes <jt@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 20 Jan 2005 09:25:22 -0800
Just to clarify, but I think you already got this nuance. I was not talking about the frequency of people using IrDA. I just say that when people use IrDA, they are likely to use few sockets (as oppo
/archives/netdev/2005-01/msg02405.html (12,555 bytes)

16. Re: [PATCH 6/9] irda: use sock slab cache (score: 1)
Author: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 20 Jan 2005 19:08:06 -0200
stage should be, the protocols will just use (IRDA for the example): Can't we just transition IrDA sockets to "future", rather than "transitional". This way we are done, and no longer need to worry
/archives/netdev/2005-01/msg02407.html (11,035 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu