Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[PATCH\s+5\/7\]\s+xfs\:\s+kill\s+the\s+STATIC

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[PATCH\s+5\/7\]\s+xfs\:\s+kill\s+the\s+STATIC_INLINE\s+macro\s*$/: 2 ]

Total 2 documents matching your query.

1. [PATCH 5/7] xfs: kill the STATIC_INLINE macro (score: 1): Author: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Sat, 14 Nov 2009 11:17:22 -0500; Remove our own STATIC_INLINE macro. For small function inside implementation files just use STATIC and let gcc inline it, and for those in headers do the normal static inline - they are all small eno; /archives/xfs/2009-11/msg00098.html (14,567 bytes)
2. Re: [PATCH 5/7] xfs: kill the STATIC_INLINE macro (score: 1): Author: Dave Chinner <david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Mon, 16 Nov 2009 14:20:57 +1100; Looks good. Reviewed-by: Dave Chinner <david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> -- Dave Chinner david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx; /archives/xfs/2009-11/msg00113.html (9,789 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 2
Page: [1]