Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[PATCH\s+5\/5\]\s+r8169\:\s+ethtool\s+hardware\s+statistics\s+support\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[PATCH\s+5\/5\]\s+r8169\:\s+ethtool\s+hardware\s+statistics\s+support\s*$/: 16 ]

Total 16 documents matching your query.

1. [PATCH 5/5] r8169: ethtool hardware statistics support (score: 1): Author: r <shemminger@xxxxxxxx>; Date: Wed, 9 Mar 2005 11:36:26 -0800; Add ethtool support for dumping the chip statistics. There aren't lots of statistics available, but this is what is available according to the RealTek documentation. Signed-off-by: Stephen Hemminger; /archives/netdev/2005-03/msg00553.html (12,481 bytes)
2. Re: [PATCH 5/5] r8169: ethtool hardware statistics support (score: 1): Author: raf <tgraf@xxxxxxx>; Date: Wed, 09 Mar 2005 14:53:14 -0500; Stephen Hemminger wrote: Add ethtool support for dumping the chip statistics. There aren't lots of statistics available, but this is what is available according to the RealTek documentation. Signed-o; /archives/netdev/2005-03/msg00570.html (13,117 bytes)
3. Re: [PATCH 5/5] r8169: ethtool hardware statistics support (score: 1): Author: ravamudan <nacc@xxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Wed, 9 Mar 2005 15:37:30 -0600; Does this patch fix the problem of bogus statistics if the interface is down?; /archives/netdev/2005-03/msg00591.html (8,509 bytes)
4. Re: [PATCH 5/5] r8169: ethtool hardware statistics support (score: 1): Author: Greear <greearb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Wed, 9 Mar 2005 13:53:45 -0800; I see no problem when interface is down. It returns all zero's because the device is reset on probe (and on shutdown).; /archives/netdev/2005-03/msg00592.html (8,767 bytes)
5. Re: [PATCH 5/5] r8169: ethtool hardware statistics support (score: 1): Author: xxxxxx (Luis R. Rodriguez); Date: Wed, 9 Mar 2005 22:21:48 -0600; I can confirm that I see no statistic errors either. I believe the faulty code in Richard's patch was: + if (RTL_R32(StatsAddrLow) & DumpStats) + return; /* no stats - took too long */ Which returned; /archives/netdev/2005-03/msg00630.html (9,622 bytes)
6. Re: [PATCH 5/5] r8169: ethtool hardware statistics support (score: 1): Author: adi Salim <hadi@xxxxxxxx>; Date: Thu, 10 Mar 2005 12:00:55 -0800; The problem with the 8139cp is that it allocates the area to hold the statistics as part of the ring structure. The ring structure doesn't exist until device is up. I figured that there was no point; /archives/netdev/2005-03/msg00670.html (10,283 bytes)
7. Re: [PATCH 5/5] r8169: ethtool hardware statistics support (score: 1): Author: n <marcel@xxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Thu, 10 Mar 2005 15:09:45 -0500; Stephen Hemminger wrote: On Wed, 9 Mar 2005 22:21:48 -0600 Jon Mason <jdmason@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: On Wednesday 09 March 2005 03:53 pm, Stephen Hemminger wrote: On Wed, 9 Mar 2005 15:37:30 -0600 Jon Ma; /archives/netdev/2005-03/msg00672.html (11,205 bytes)
8. htool message level control (score: 1): Author: xxxxx>; Date: Sat, 12 Mar 2005 12:32:05 +0000; Stephen Hemminger wrote: Add ethtool support for dumping the chip statistics. There aren't lots of statistics available, but this is what is available according to the RealTek documentation. [snip]; /archives/netdev/2005-03/msg00799.html (9,463 bytes)
9. [PATCH 5/5] r8169: ethtool hardware statistics support (score: 1): Author: Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@xxxxxxxx>; Date: Wed, 9 Mar 2005 11:36:26 -0800; Add ethtool support for dumping the chip statistics. There aren't lots of statistics available, but this is what is available according to the RealTek documentation. Signed-off-by: Stephen Hemminger; /archives/netdev/2005-03/msg02476.html (12,481 bytes)
10. Re: [PATCH 5/5] r8169: ethtool hardware statistics support (score: 1): Author: Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@xxxxxxxxx>; Date: Wed, 09 Mar 2005 14:53:14 -0500; Signed-off-by: Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@xxxxxxxx> diff -Nru a/drivers/net/r8169.c b/drivers/net/r8169.c -- a/drivers/net/r8169.c 2005-03-09 11:26:04 -08:00 +++ b/drivers/net/r8169.c 2005-03-09 1; /archives/netdev/2005-03/msg02493.html (13,422 bytes)
11. Re: [PATCH 5/5] r8169: ethtool hardware statistics support (score: 1): Author: Jon Mason <jdmason@xxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Wed, 9 Mar 2005 15:37:30 -0600; Does this patch fix the problem of bogus statistics if the interface is down?; /archives/netdev/2005-03/msg02514.html (8,571 bytes)
12. Re: [PATCH 5/5] r8169: ethtool hardware statistics support (score: 1): Author: Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@xxxxxxxx>; Date: Wed, 9 Mar 2005 13:53:45 -0800; I see no problem when interface is down. It returns all zero's because the device is reset on probe (and on shutdown).; /archives/netdev/2005-03/msg02515.html (8,866 bytes)
13. Re: [PATCH 5/5] r8169: ethtool hardware statistics support (score: 1): Author: Jon Mason <jdmason@xxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Wed, 9 Mar 2005 22:21:48 -0600; I can confirm that I see no statistic errors either. I believe the faulty code in Richard's patch was: + if (RTL_R32(StatsAddrLow) & DumpStats) + return; /* no stats - took too long */ Which returned; /archives/netdev/2005-03/msg02553.html (9,749 bytes)
14. Re: [PATCH 5/5] r8169: ethtool hardware statistics support (score: 1): Author: Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@xxxxxxxx>; Date: Thu, 10 Mar 2005 12:00:55 -0800; The problem with the 8139cp is that it allocates the area to hold the statistics as part of the ring structure. The ring structure doesn't exist until device is up. I figured that there was no point; /archives/netdev/2005-03/msg02593.html (10,447 bytes)
15. Re: [PATCH 5/5] r8169: ethtool hardware statistics support (score: 1): Author: Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@xxxxxxxxx>; Date: Thu, 10 Mar 2005 15:09:45 -0500; On Wed, 9 Mar 2005 15:37:30 -0600 Does this patch fix the problem of bogus statistics if the interface is down I see no problem when interface is down. It returns all zero's because the device is re; /archives/netdev/2005-03/msg02595.html (11,263 bytes)
16. Re: [PATCH 5/5] r8169: ethtool hardware statistics support (score: 1): Author: Richard Dawe <rich@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Sat, 12 Mar 2005 12:32:05 +0000; Hello. Stephen Hemminger wrote: Add ethtool support for dumping the chip statistics. There aren't lots of statistics available, but this is what is available according to the RealTek documentation. [; /archives/netdev/2005-03/msg02722.html (9,431 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 16
Page: [1]