Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[PATCH\s+5\/5\]\s+implement\s+IHOLD\/IRELE\s+directly\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[PATCH\s+5\/5\]\s+implement\s+IHOLD\/IRELE\s+directly\s*$/: 15 ]

Total 15 documents matching your query.

1. [PATCH 5/5] implement IHOLD/IRELE directly (score: 1): Author:; Date: Wed, 23 Jul 2008 21:49:50 +0200; Now that all direct calls to VN_HOLD/VN_RELE are gone we can implement IHOLD/IRELE directly. For the IHOLD case also replace igrab with a direct increment of i_count because we are guaranteed to alre; /archives/xfs/2008-07/msg00413.html (10,605 bytes)
2. Re: [PATCH 5/5] implement IHOLD/IRELE directly (score: 1): Author:; Date: Thu, 24 Jul 2008 08:55:48 +1000; Seeing as you are changing from an igrab() to a straight atomic_inc(), can you put an: ASSERT(atomic_read(&VFS_I(ip)->i_count) > 0) into the IHOLD macro so we catch screwups in reference counting as; /archives/xfs/2008-07/msg00444.html (8,631 bytes)
3. Re: [PATCH 5/5] implement IHOLD/IRELE directly (score: 1): Author: xxxxx>; Date: Thu, 24 Jul 2008 08:22:20 +0200; Makes sense, updated patch below. (Half-way through xfsqa with a debug kernel so far) Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx> Index: linux-2.6-xfs/fs/xfs/linux-2.6/xfs_ksyms.c == -- linux-2.6-x; /archives/xfs/2008-07/msg00456.html (11,985 bytes)
4. Re: [PATCH 5/5] implement IHOLD/IRELE directly (score: 1): Author: xxxxx>; Date: Thu, 24 Jul 2008 10:07:27 +0200; xfsqa passed fine with this patch applied.; /archives/xfs/2008-07/msg00464.html (7,893 bytes)
5. Re: [PATCH 5/5] implement IHOLD/IRELE directly (score: 1): Author: xxxxx>; Date: Thu, 24 Jul 2008 18:21:31 +1000; Christoph Hellwig wrote: On Thu, Jul 24, 2008 at 08:22:20AM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote: Makes sense, updated patch below. (Half-way through xfsqa with a debug kernel so far) xfsqa passed fine wit; /archives/xfs/2008-07/msg00465.html (8,730 bytes)
6. [PATCH 5/5] implement IHOLD/IRELE directly (score: 1): Author: xxxxxx>; Date: Wed, 23 Jul 2008 21:49:50 +0200; Now that all direct calls to VN_HOLD/VN_RELE are gone we can implement IHOLD/IRELE directly. For the IHOLD case also replace igrab with a direct increment of i_count because we are guaranteed to alre; /archives/xfs/2008-07/msg01036.html (10,605 bytes)
7. Re: [PATCH 5/5] implement IHOLD/IRELE directly (score: 1): Author: xxxxxx>; Date: Thu, 24 Jul 2008 08:55:48 +1000; Seeing as you are changing from an igrab() to a straight atomic_inc(), can you put an: ASSERT(atomic_read(&VFS_I(ip)->i_count) > 0) into the IHOLD macro so we catch screwups in reference counting as; /archives/xfs/2008-07/msg01067.html (8,631 bytes)
8. Re: [PATCH 5/5] implement IHOLD/IRELE directly (score: 1): Author: <hch@xxxxxx>; Date: Thu, 24 Jul 2008 08:22:20 +0200; Makes sense, updated patch below. (Half-way through xfsqa with a debug kernel so far) Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx> Index: linux-2.6-xfs/fs/xfs/linux-2.6/xfs_ksyms.c == -- linux-2.6-x; /archives/xfs/2008-07/msg01079.html (11,985 bytes)
9. Re: [PATCH 5/5] implement IHOLD/IRELE directly (score: 1): Author: hlan@xxxxxxx>; Date: Thu, 24 Jul 2008 10:07:27 +0200; xfsqa passed fine with this patch applied.; /archives/xfs/2008-07/msg01087.html (7,893 bytes)
10. Re: [PATCH 5/5] implement IHOLD/IRELE directly (score: 1): Author: <hch@xxxxxx>; Date: Thu, 24 Jul 2008 18:21:31 +1000; Christoph Hellwig wrote: On Thu, Jul 24, 2008 at 08:22:20AM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote: Makes sense, updated patch below. (Half-way through xfsqa with a debug kernel so far) xfsqa passed fine wit; /archives/xfs/2008-07/msg01088.html (8,730 bytes)
11. [PATCH 5/5] implement IHOLD/IRELE directly (score: 1): Author: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx>; Date: Wed, 23 Jul 2008 21:49:50 +0200; Now that all direct calls to VN_HOLD/VN_RELE are gone we can implement IHOLD/IRELE directly. For the IHOLD case also replace igrab with a direct increment of i_count because we are guaranteed to alre; /archives/xfs/2008-07/msg01659.html (10,605 bytes)
12. Re: [PATCH 5/5] implement IHOLD/IRELE directly (score: 1): Author: Dave Chinner <david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Thu, 24 Jul 2008 08:55:48 +1000; Seeing as you are changing from an igrab() to a straight atomic_inc(), can you put an: ASSERT(atomic_read(&VFS_I(ip)->i_count) > 0) into the IHOLD macro so we catch screwups in reference counting as; /archives/xfs/2008-07/msg01690.html (8,689 bytes)
13. Re: [PATCH 5/5] implement IHOLD/IRELE directly (score: 1): Author: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx>; Date: Thu, 24 Jul 2008 08:22:20 +0200; Makes sense, updated patch below. (Half-way through xfsqa with a debug kernel so far) Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx> Index: linux-2.6-xfs/fs/xfs/linux-2.6/xfs_ksyms.c == -- linux-2.6-x; /archives/xfs/2008-07/msg01702.html (12,128 bytes)
14. Re: [PATCH 5/5] implement IHOLD/IRELE directly (score: 1): Author: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx>; Date: Thu, 24 Jul 2008 10:07:27 +0200; xfsqa passed fine with this patch applied.; /archives/xfs/2008-07/msg01710.html (8,039 bytes)
15. Re: [PATCH 5/5] implement IHOLD/IRELE directly (score: 1): Author: Lachlan McIlroy <lachlan@xxxxxxx>; Date: Thu, 24 Jul 2008 18:21:31 +1000; Christoph Hellwig wrote: On Thu, Jul 24, 2008 at 08:22:20AM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote: Makes sense, updated patch below. (Half-way through xfsqa with a debug kernel so far) xfsqa passed fine wit; /archives/xfs/2008-07/msg01711.html (8,944 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 15
Page: [1]