- 1. [PATCH 2.6-bk 1/1] tg3: add license (score: 1)
- Author: n@xxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 09 Nov 2004 11:59:58 +0100
- there is no license, yes it's GPL but... -thanksdiff -Nuar o/drivers/net/tg3.c n/drivers/net/tg3.c -- o/drivers/net/tg3.c 2004-11-09 11:49:06.000000000 +0100 +++ n/drivers/net/tg3.c 2004-11-09 11:43
- /archives/netdev/2004-11/msg00332.html (9,270 bytes)
- 2. Re: [PATCH 2.6-bk 1/1] tg3: add license (score: 1)
- Author: xx>
- Date: Tue, 9 Nov 2004 12:47:04 -0800
- Why add this, it's basically implied? We have a copy of the file "COPYING" at the top of the source tree, which is why we don't duplicate it's contents nor excerpts all over the tree.
- /archives/netdev/2004-11/msg00347.html (7,683 bytes)
- 3. Re: [PATCH 2.6-bk 1/1] tg3: add license (score: 1)
- Author: <vkondra@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 09 Nov 2004 23:45:29 +0100
- David S. Miller wrote: Why add this, it's basically implied? Maybe it should be answered by a lawyer, but it's better to protect our freedom because law is very 'variable'. We have a copy of the file
- /archives/netdev/2004-11/msg00354.html (9,179 bytes)
- 4. [PATCH 2.6-bk 1/1] tg3: add license (score: 1)
- Author: Xose Vazquez Perez <xose@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 09 Nov 2004 11:59:58 +0100
- hi, there is no license, yes it's GPL but... -thanksdiff -Nuar o/drivers/net/tg3.c n/drivers/net/tg3.c -- o/drivers/net/tg3.c 2004-11-09 11:49:06.000000000 +0100 +++ n/drivers/net/tg3.c 2004-11-09 11
- /archives/netdev/2004-11/msg01386.html (9,224 bytes)
- 5. Re: [PATCH 2.6-bk 1/1] tg3: add license (score: 1)
- Author: "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 9 Nov 2004 12:47:04 -0800
- Why add this, it's basically implied? We have a copy of the file "COPYING" at the top of the source tree, which is why we don't duplicate it's contents nor excerpts all over the tree.
- /archives/netdev/2004-11/msg01401.html (7,731 bytes)
- 6. Re: [PATCH 2.6-bk 1/1] tg3: add license (score: 1)
- Author: Xose Vazquez Perez <xose@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 09 Nov 2004 23:45:29 +0100
- Why add this, it's basically implied? Maybe it should be answered by a lawyer, but it's better to protect our freedom because law is very 'variable'. We have a copy of the file "COPYING" at the top
- /archives/netdev/2004-11/msg01408.html (8,968 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu