Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[PATCH\s+2\.6\]\s+Add\s+NAPI\s+support\s+to\s+sungem\.c\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[PATCH\s+2\.6\]\s+Add\s+NAPI\s+support\s+to\s+sungem\.c\s*$/: 22 ]

Total 22 documents matching your query.

1. [PATCH 2.6] Add NAPI support to sungem.c (score: 1): Author: @xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Tue, 14 Sep 2004 17:35:37 +0200; lity if; /archives/netdev/2004-09/msg00488.html (9,295 bytes)
2. Re: [PATCH 2.6] Add NAPI support to sungem.c (score: 1): Author: on Blanchard <anton@xxxxxxxxx>; Date: Tue, 14 Sep 2004 11:56:08 -0400; er with; /archives/netdev/2004-09/msg00489.html (18,234 bytes)
3. Re: [PATCH 2.6] Add NAPI support to sungem.c (score: 1): Author: dilger@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Tue, 14 Sep 2004 12:43:15 -0700; -- vda; /archives/netdev/2004-09/msg00495.html (8,644 bytes)
4. Re: [PATCH 2.6] Add NAPI support to sungem.c (score: 1): Author: xxxx>; Date: Tue, 14 Sep 2004 21:50:52 +0200; ls you'; /archives/netdev/2004-09/msg00496.html (11,909 bytes)
5. Re: [PATCH 2.6] Add NAPI support to sungem.c (score: 1): Author: xxxxxxx>; Date: Tue, 14 Sep 2004 22:02:38 +0200; de file; /archives/netdev/2004-09/msg00497.html (9,885 bytes)
6. Re: [PATCH 2.6] Add NAPI support to sungem.c (score: 1): Author: o <vda@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Tue, 14 Sep 2004 13:48:49 -0700; re_rcv,; /archives/netdev/2004-09/msg00499.html (9,017 bytes)
7. Re: [PATCH 2.6] Add NAPI support to sungem.c (score: 1): Author: David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Tue, 14 Sep 2004 13:52:34 -0700; myself.; /archives/netdev/2004-09/msg00500.html (10,264 bytes)
8. Re: [PATCH 2.6] Add NAPI support to sungem.c (score: 1): Author:; Date: Tue, 14 Sep 2004 17:01:17 -0400; the win; /archives/netdev/2004-09/msg00502.html (9,659 bytes)
9. Re: [PATCH 2.6] Add NAPI support to sungem.c (score: 1): Author: S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Wed, 15 Sep 2004 07:50:28 +0200; into th; /archives/netdev/2004-09/msg00532.html (9,892 bytes)
10. Re: [PATCH 2.6] Add NAPI support to sungem.c (score: 1): Author: . Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Wed, 15 Sep 2004 18:19:31 +0200; me :-); /archives/netdev/2004-09/msg00556.html (10,386 bytes)
11. Re: [PATCH 2.6] Add NAPI support to sungem.c (score: 1): Author: xxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Wed, 15 Sep 2004 21:37:18 +0200; s an op; /archives/netdev/2004-09/msg00566.html (10,001 bytes)
12. [PATCH 2.6] Add NAPI support to sungem.c (score: 1): Author: Harald Welte <laforge@xxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Tue, 14 Sep 2004 17:35:37 +0200; Hi Dave! Please find the attached patch to add NAPI support to the sungem.c driver (I was annoyed by the fact the pktgen could kill my Powerbook). Since this is my first hack of a network driver with; /archives/netdev/2004-09/msg01944.html (9,310 bytes)
13. Re: [PATCH 2.6] Add NAPI support to sungem.c (score: 1): Author: Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@xxxxxxxxx>; Date: Tue, 14 Sep 2004 11:56:08 -0400; Please find the attached patch to add NAPI support to the sungem.c driver (I was annoyed by the fact the pktgen could kill my Powerbook). Since this is my first hack of a network driver within at lea; /archives/netdev/2004-09/msg01945.html (19,761 bytes)
14. Re: [PATCH 2.6] Add NAPI support to sungem.c (score: 1): Author: "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Tue, 14 Sep 2004 12:43:15 -0700; Harald.... check current BK it has NAPI support added to the sungem.c driver already, it was written by Eric Lemoine with some fixes by myself and benh :-) I guess these are one of the old mails you'; /archives/netdev/2004-09/msg01951.html (8,702 bytes)
15. Re: [PATCH 2.6] Add NAPI support to sungem.c (score: 1): Author: Harald Welte <laforge@xxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Tue, 14 Sep 2004 21:50:52 +0200; Hi Jeff, thanks for your comments. I'm not sure whether I need mb() or wmb() ? Or even better: Can anybody direct me to a document describing the primitives in more detail than the linux include file; /archives/netdev/2004-09/msg01952.html (12,001 bytes)
16. Re: [PATCH 2.6] Add NAPI support to sungem.c (score: 1): Author: Harald Welte <laforge@xxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Tue, 14 Sep 2004 22:02:38 +0200; Gnah, I hate duplicated efforts. Well, I learned a bit about NIC drivers, though :( No, unfortunately not :( Before I start NAPI-enabling natsemi.c (and again duplicate work): Do you know of anybody; /archives/netdev/2004-09/msg01953.html (10,003 bytes)
17. Re: [PATCH 2.6] Add NAPI support to sungem.c (score: 1): Author: "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Tue, 14 Sep 2004 13:48:49 -0700; No I do not, have at it. I'm going to try and work on sunhme myself.; /archives/netdev/2004-09/msg01955.html (9,141 bytes)
18. Re: [PATCH 2.6] Add NAPI support to sungem.c (score: 1): Author: "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Tue, 14 Sep 2004 13:52:34 -0700; No, it's something else. If you do something like, as one example: /* Chip resets require 40msec settle delay. */ writel(FOO_RESET, regs + FOO); udelay(40); It's not going to work properly because th; /archives/netdev/2004-09/msg01956.html (10,375 bytes)
19. Re: [PATCH 2.6] Add NAPI support to sungem.c (score: 1): Author: Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@xxxxxxxxx>; Date: Tue, 14 Sep 2004 17:01:17 -0400; Talk to Manfred Spraul, he's pokes fixes natsemi bugs and pokes at it now and again... Jeff; /archives/netdev/2004-09/msg01958.html (9,828 bytes)
20. Re: [PATCH 2.6] Add NAPI support to sungem.c (score: 1): Author: Eric Lemoine <eric.lemoine@xxxxxxxxx>; Date: Wed, 15 Sep 2004 07:50:28 +0200; Your patch has the netpoll bits while current BK does not. I'm not ;-) PS: If you happened to experiment with the NAPIfied SunGEM driver on your setup, could you please share the data. Thx. -- Eric; /archives/netdev/2004-09/msg01988.html (10,016 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 20
Page: [1] [2]