Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[PATCH\s+2\.5\.69\]\s+Network\s+packet\s+type\s+using\s+RCU\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[PATCH\s+2\.5\.69\]\s+Network\s+packet\s+type\s+using\s+RCU\s*$/: 8 ]

Total 8 documents matching your query.

1. [PATCH 2.5.69] Network packet type using RCU (score: 1): Author: ger@xxxxxxxx>; Date: Fri, 9 May 2003 14:25:38 -0700; Convert network packet type list from using brlock to RCU based list. Some collataral changes to af_packet were necessary since it needs to unregister packet types without sleeping. Summary: * packet; /archives/netdev/2003-05/msg00100.html (19,990 bytes)
2. Re: [PATCH 2.5.69] Network packet type using RCU (score: 1): Author: xxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Wed, 14 May 2003 12:19:13 -0700 (PDT); We're still using linked lists Jamal.; /archives/netdev/2003-05/msg00126.html (7,826 bytes)
3. Re: [PATCH 2.5.69] Network packet type using RCU (score: 1): Author: em@xxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Wed, 14 May 2003 07:23:32 -0400 (EDT); Apologies i was offline for a bit so dont know the history here. I see a lot of move to rcu. There are benefits to using RCU in certain cases (example occasional list edit with a lot more reads). Why; /archives/netdev/2003-05/msg00175.html (24,544 bytes)
4. Re: [PATCH 2.5.69] Network packet type using RCU (score: 1): Author: avem@xxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Mon, 19 May 2003 00:22:19 -0700 (PDT); Apologies i was offline for a bit so dont know the history here. I see a lot of move to rcu. There are benefits to using RCU in certain cases (example occasional list edit with a lot more reads). Why; /archives/netdev/2003-05/msg00176.html (8,137 bytes)
5. [PATCH 2.5.69] Network packet type using RCU (score: 1): Author: Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@xxxxxxxx>; Date: Fri, 9 May 2003 14:25:38 -0700; Convert network packet type list from using brlock to RCU based list. Some collataral changes to af_packet were necessary since it needs to unregister packet types without sleeping. Summary: * packet; /archives/netdev/2003-05/msg00502.html (19,990 bytes)
6. Re: [PATCH 2.5.69] Network packet type using RCU (score: 1): Author: "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Wed, 14 May 2003 12:19:13 -0700 (PDT); We're still using linked lists Jamal.; /archives/netdev/2003-05/msg00528.html (7,926 bytes)
7. Re: [PATCH 2.5.69] Network packet type using RCU (score: 1): Author: Jamal Hadi <hadi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Wed, 14 May 2003 07:23:32 -0400 (EDT); Apologies i was offline for a bit so dont know the history here. I see a lot of move to rcu. There are benefits to using RCU in certain cases (example occasional list edit with a lot more reads). Why; /archives/netdev/2003-05/msg00577.html (24,628 bytes)
8. Re: [PATCH 2.5.69] Network packet type using RCU (score: 1): Author: "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Mon, 19 May 2003 00:22:19 -0700 (PDT); Apologies i was offline for a bit so dont know the history here. I see a lot of move to rcu. There are benefits to using RCU in certain cases (example occasional list edit with a lot more reads). Why; /archives/netdev/2003-05/msg00578.html (8,237 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 8
Page: [1]