Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[PATCH\s+2\/9\]\s+PKT_SCHED\:\s+tc\s+filter\s+extension\s+API\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[PATCH\s+2\/9\]\s+PKT_SCHED\:\s+tc\s+filter\s+extension\s+API\s*$/: 28 ]

Total 28 documents matching your query.

1. cut for nested TLVs (score: 1): Author: linux lover <linux_lover2004@xxxxxxxxx>; Date: Thu, 30 Dec 2004 13:30:23 +0100; xx> -- linux-2.6.10.orig/include/linux/rtnetlink.h 2004-12-25 23:21:18.000000000 +0100 +++ linux-2.6.10/include/linux/rtnetlink.h 2004-12-26 19:52:21.000000000; /archives/netdev/2004-12/msg00865.html (19,627 bytes)
2. tions in ipt action (score: 1): Author: aber@xxxxxxxxx>; Date: 30 Dec 2004 08:51:54 -0500; xxx> 2004-12-30 04:40 You might want to use rtattr_parse_nested here (see patch 1 of my latest patchset) if (rtattr_parse_nested(tb, TCA_IPT_MAX, rta) < 0) Pur; /archives/netdev/2004-12/msg00879.html (10,311 bytes)
3. oin this mail list? (score: 1): Author: af@xxxxxxx>; Date: Thu, 30 Dec 2004 15:09:29 +0100; the mail to join the mail list, how can I do? Just write "subscribe" in the body? "subscribe netdev", this is the email body, you must send it to majordomo2os; /archives/netdev/2004-12/msg00881.html (10,286 bytes)
4. nd 2.4 SCTP updates (score: 1): Author: ieu <romieu@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Fri, 31 Dec 2004 02:01:06 +0100; p.bkbits.net/lksctp-2.5.work & bk pull http://linux-lksctp.bkbits.net/lksctp-2.4.work to get the following SCTP updates to 2.6 and 2.4. The 2.4 csets include a; /archives/netdev/2004-12/msg00901.html (11,923 bytes)
5. ilter extension API (score: 1): Author: McHardy <kaber@xxxxxxxxx>; Date: Fri, 31 Dec 2004 00:04:29 -0200; struct rtattr **tb, + struct rtattr *rate_tlv, struct tcf_exts *exts, + struct tcf_ext_map *map) +{ + memset(exts, 0, sizeof(*exts)); + +#ifdef CONFIG_NET_CLS; /archives/netdev/2004-12/msg00902.html (11,627 bytes)
6. for outbound xfrms (score: 1): Author: @xxxxxxxxx>; Date: 30 Dec 2004 23:36:57 -0500; ap) +{ + memset(ex; /archives/netdev/2004-12/msg00904.html (16,430 bytes)
7. ilter extension API (score: 1): Author: alho de Melo <acme@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: 30 Dec 2004 23:42:44 -0500; nk they should be sufficient. TCA_ACT_OK is 0. Maybe a few DPRINTKs for debugging purposes? Patrick pointed this in other email: the xchg is sort of defeated b; /archives/netdev/2004-12/msg00905.html (11,325 bytes)
8. lter debug messages (score: 1): Author: sel@xxxxxxxxx>; Date: 31 Dec 2004 00:04:39 -0500; ver a pack; /archives/netdev/2004-12/msg00912.html (11,132 bytes)
9. its socket and sock (score: 1): Author: sel@xxxxxxxxx>; Date: 31 Dec 2004 00:02:42 -0500; oing to be sent out. Would you please tell me which one of the following items is right for the packet (Let's suppose struct sock *sk; struct socket *skt): 1),; /archives/netdev/2004-12/msg00914.html (11,936 bytes)
10. lter debug messages (score: 1): Author: adi@xxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Fri, 31 Dec 2004 10:52:54 +0100; tunnel. Here is the ifconfig output: eth0 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 00:50:04:0B:DD:79 inet addr:192.168.10.1 Bcast:192.168.10.255 Mask:255.255.255.0 inet6 add; /archives/netdev/2004-12/msg00917.html (12,212 bytes)
11. lter debug messages (score: 1): Author: xxxxx>; Date: Fri, 31 Dec 2004 12:18:53 +0100; ave to figure out what to make for dinner tonight and do the associated shopping first :) Wichert. -- Wichert Akkerman <wichert@xxxxxxxxx> It is simple to make; /archives/netdev/2004-12/msg00924.html (12,275 bytes)
12. use of tcf_exts API (score: 1): Author: @xxxxxxxxx>; Date: Fri, 31 Dec 2004 14:10:39 +0100; xxxxxxxxxxx> 2004-12-30 23:43 I thought about this but couldn't come up with one that makes it actually easier. I don't want to hardcode action/police in a mac; /archives/netdev/2004-12/msg00927.html (13,023 bytes)
13. config dependencies (score: 1): Author: linux lover <linux_lover2004@xxxxxxxxx>; Date: Fri, 31 Dec 2004 15:18:49 +0100; and old compat policer mutually exclusive to reflect the code. Noted by Jamal Hadi Salim. Signed-off-by: Thomas Graf <tgraf@xxxxxxx> -- linux-2.6.10-bk2.orig/; /archives/netdev/2004-12/msg00932.html (11,872 bytes)
14. ilter extension API (score: 1): Author: xxxx>; Date: Fri, 31 Dec 2004 15:35:22 +0100; 049.181.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> 2004-12-30 23:36 Patrick pointed this in other email: the xchg is sort of defeated by the else. Perhaps make the second one xch; /archives/netdev/2004-12/msg00933.html (11,680 bytes)
15. [PATCH 2/9] PKT_SCHED: tc filter extension API (score: 1): Author: Thomas Graf <tgraf@xxxxxxx>; Date: Thu, 30 Dec 2004 13:30:23 +0100; The tcf_exts API abstracts extensions such as actions/policers into a generic layer and reduces the knowledge inside classifiers to the minimum required. It isolates the validation code into its own; /archives/netdev/2004-12/msg01816.html (19,687 bytes)
16. Re: [PATCH 2/9] PKT_SCHED: tc filter extension API (score: 1): Author: jamal <hadi@xxxxxxxxxx>; Date: 30 Dec 2004 08:51:54 -0500; Thomas, Havent looked at the whole set - will later today; quick question: Things like above: In current code you can have CONFIG_NET_CLS_ACT and not use new style policer, rather use old one i.e CON; /archives/netdev/2004-12/msg01830.html (10,401 bytes)
17. Re: [PATCH 2/9] PKT_SCHED: tc filter extension API (score: 1): Author: Thomas Graf <tgraf@xxxxxxx>; Date: Thu, 30 Dec 2004 15:09:29 +0100; * jamal <1104414713.1047.130.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> 2004-12-30 08:51 Is this wrong? Current code: (u32) 2004/06/15 hadi | #ifdef CONFIG_NET_CLS_ACT 2004/06/15 hadi | struct tc_action *action; 2004/0; /archives/netdev/2004-12/msg01832.html (10,412 bytes)
18. Re: [PATCH 2/9] PKT_SCHED: tc filter extension API (score: 1): Author: Patrick McHardy <kaber@xxxxxxxxx>; Date: Fri, 31 Dec 2004 02:01:06 +0100; +int +tcf_exts_validate(struct tcf_proto *tp, struct rtattr **tb, + struct rtattr *rate_tlv, struct tcf_exts *exts, + struct tcf_ext_map *map) +{ + memset(exts, 0, sizeof(*exts)); + +#ifdef CONFIG_N; /archives/netdev/2004-12/msg01852.html (11,964 bytes)
19. Re: [PATCH 2/9] PKT_SCHED: tc filter extension API (score: 1): Author: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Fri, 31 Dec 2004 00:04:29 -0200; +int +tcf_exts_validate(struct tcf_proto *tp, struct rtattr **tb, + struct rtattr *rate_tlv, struct tcf_exts *exts, + struct tcf_ext_map *map) +{ + memset(exts, 0, sizeof(*exts)); + +#ifdef CONFIG_N; /archives/netdev/2004-12/msg01853.html (11,725 bytes)
20. Re: [PATCH 2/9] PKT_SCHED: tc filter extension API (score: 1): Author: jamal <hadi@xxxxxxxxxx>; Date: 30 Dec 2004 23:36:57 -0500; Which cache? Look at the TC_ACT_*; i think they should be sufficient. TCA_ACT_OK is 0. Maybe a few DPRINTKs for debugging purposes? Patrick pointed this in other email: the xchg is sort of defeated b; /archives/netdev/2004-12/msg01855.html (16,520 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 20
Page: [1] [2]