Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[PATCH\s+13\/16\]\s+xfs\:\s+batch\s+inode\s+reclaim\s+lookup\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. [PATCH 13/16] xfs: batch inode reclaim lookup (score: 1)
Author: Dave Chinner <david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 22 Sep 2010 16:44:26 +1000
Batch and optimise the per-ag inode lookup for reclaim to minimise scanning overhead. This involves gang lookups on the radix trees to get multiple inodes during each tree walk, and tighter validatio
/archives/xfs/2010-09/msg00372.html (15,981 bytes)

2. Re: [PATCH 13/16] xfs: batch inode reclaim lookup (score: 1)
Author: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 22 Sep 2010 13:34:10 -0400
Hmm, I can't remember seeing that patch. But the code itself looks good, Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx>
/archives/xfs/2010-09/msg00385.html (9,529 bytes)

3. Re: [PATCH 13/16] xfs: batch inode reclaim lookup (score: 1)
Author: Dave Chinner <david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 23 Sep 2010 10:43:05 +1000
http://oss.sgi.com/archives/xfs/2010-07/msg00348.html Cheers, Dave. -- Dave Chinner david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
/archives/xfs/2010-09/msg00405.html (9,965 bytes)

4. Re: [PATCH 13/16] xfs: batch inode reclaim lookup (score: 1)
Author: Alex Elder <aelder@xxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 23 Sep 2010 12:39:29 -0500
Looks good. Reviewed-by: Alex Elder <aelder@xxxxxxx>
/archives/xfs/2010-09/msg00426.html (9,998 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu