Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[PATCH\s+12\/16\]\s+xfs\:\s+simplify\s+xfs_qm_detach

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[PATCH\s+12\/16\]\s+xfs\:\s+simplify\s+xfs_qm_detach_gdquots\s*$/: 2 ]

Total 2 documents matching your query.

1. [PATCH 12/16] xfs: simplify xfs_qm_detach_gdquots (score: 1): Author: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Mon, 28 Nov 2011 03:27:34 -0500; With the new lock order there is no reason to drop qi_dqlist_lock around calls to xfs_qm_dqrele. Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx> -- fs/xfs/xfs_qm.c | 22 +++++-- 1 file changed, 5 insert; /archives/xfs/2011-11/msg00552.html (10,311 bytes)
2. Re: [PATCH 12/16] xfs: simplify xfs_qm_detach_gdquots (score: 1): Author: Dave Chinner <david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Mon, 5 Dec 2011 16:18:43 +1100; .... because the free list lock now nests inside the qi_dqlist_lock and the dquot lock. Looks good. Reviewed-by: Dave Chinner <dchinner@xxxxxxxxxx> -- Dave Chinner david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx; /archives/xfs/2011-12/msg00071.html (7,643 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 2
Page: [1]