Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[PATCH\s+1\/6\]\s+xfs\:\s+optimize\s+AGFL\s+refills\s*$/: 7 ]

Total 7 documents matching your query.

1. [PATCH 1/6] xfs: optimize AGFL refills (score: 1)
Author: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 22 Mar 2011 15:55:51 -0400
Avoid forcing out busy extent when moving blocks from/to the AGFL. We archive this my moving the busy search out of xfs_alloc_get_freelist into the callers that need it, and by moving the busy list i
/archives/xfs/2011-03/msg00223.html (11,657 bytes)

2. Re: [PATCH 1/6] xfs: optimize AGFL refills (score: 1)
Author: Alex Elder <aelder@xxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 22 Mar 2011 17:30:51 -0500
Without thinking a bit about it, it wasn't clear why doing this was OK to do. It would be nice to record a one-sentence justification of why we don't need to force busy extents out in this case. achi
/archives/xfs/2011-03/msg00227.html (9,207 bytes)

3. Re: [PATCH 1/6] xfs: optimize AGFL refills (score: 1)
Author: Dave Chinner <david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 23 Mar 2011 10:30:54 +1100
Shouldn't that be "if (!error)"? i.e. if we freed the extent successfully we need to insert it in the busy list. This current code has the effect of never inserting freed data extents in the busy lis
/archives/xfs/2011-03/msg00230.html (13,313 bytes)

4. Re: [PATCH 1/6] xfs: optimize AGFL refills (score: 1)
Author: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 23 Mar 2011 08:16:13 -0400
I've added a sentence, but it seems rather pointless. fixed. fixed.
/archives/xfs/2011-03/msg00247.html (10,875 bytes)

5. Re: [PATCH 1/6] xfs: optimize AGFL refills (score: 1)
Author: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 23 Mar 2011 08:16:38 -0400
Yes, it should. This got messed up at some point during reshuffling the series.
/archives/xfs/2011-03/msg00248.html (10,372 bytes)

6. Re: [PATCH 1/6] xfs: optimize AGFL refills (score: 1)
Author: Alex Elder <aelder@xxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 25 Mar 2011 16:03:01 -0500
The reason it was not obvious is because the case you're treating is specifically when moving extents (blocks, really) between the free list and the free btrees, in xfs_alloc_fix_freelist(). You stil
/archives/xfs/2011-03/msg00284.html (11,825 bytes)

7. Re: [PATCH 1/6] xfs: optimize AGFL refills (score: 1)
Author: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 28 Mar 2011 08:07:22 -0400
I've updated the comment to make that more clear.
/archives/xfs/2011-03/msg00308.html (11,209 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu