Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[PATCH\s+1\/5\]\s+r8169\:\s+auto\s+detect\s+32\-bit\s+slot\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[PATCH\s+1\/5\]\s+r8169\:\s+auto\s+detect\s+32\-bit\s+slot\s*$/: 26 ]

Total 26 documents matching your query.

1. [PATCH 1/5] r8169: auto detect 32-bit slot (score: 1): Author: r <shemminger@xxxxxxxx>; Date: Wed, 9 Mar 2005 11:29:25 -0800; Change driver to auto-detect when the board is in a 32-bit PCI slot and avoid setting 64-bit dma mask. The module parameter method is no longer needed. Signed-off-by: Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@xx; /archives/netdev/2005-03/msg00551.html (10,301 bytes)
2. Re: [PATCH 1/5] r8169: auto detect 32-bit slot (score: 1): Author: raf <tgraf@xxxxxxx>; Date: Wed, 09 Mar 2005 14:47:57 -0500; Stephen Hemminger wrote: Change driver to auto-detect when the board is in a 32-bit PCI slot and avoid setting 64-bit dma mask. The module parameter method is no longer needed. Signed-off-by: Stephen; /archives/netdev/2005-03/msg00561.html (9,178 bytes)
3. Re: [PATCH 1/5] r8169: auto detect 32-bit slot (score: 1): Author: xxxxx>; Date: Wed, 09 Mar 2005 21:16:05 +0100; Hmm? It doesn't support DAC? Normally on PCI a 64bit slot is not needed for 64bit addresses. -Andi; /archives/netdev/2005-03/msg00575.html (9,067 bytes)
4. Re: [PATCH 1/5] r8169: auto detect 32-bit slot (score: 1): Author: Aravamudan <nacc@xxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Wed, 9 Mar 2005 22:40:23 +0100; Andi Kleen <ak@xxxxxx> : It does but it is unstable for everybody (except Jon Mason, go figure) on amd64. Stephen, on which kind of system was this change tested ? -- Ueimor; /archives/netdev/2005-03/msg00590.html (9,117 bytes)
5. Re: [PATCH 1/5] r8169: auto detect 32-bit slot (score: 1): Author: is Romieu <romieu@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Wed, 9 Mar 2005 13:55:30 -0800; I tested on old Celeron with Netgear card. I could try Amd and/or Xeon if you want.; /archives/netdev/2005-03/msg00593.html (9,577 bytes)
6. Re: [PATCH 1/5] r8169: auto detect 32-bit slot (score: 1): Author: "Steve Iribarne" <steve.iribarne@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Wed, 9 Mar 2005 16:08:59 -0600; Just lucky, I guess. I can give it a try again. -- Jon Mason jdmason@xxxxxxxxxx; /archives/netdev/2005-03/msg00596.html (9,718 bytes)
7. Re: [PATCH 1/5] r8169: auto detect 32-bit slot (score: 1): Author: en Hemminger <shemminger@xxxxxxxx>; Date: Wed, 9 Mar 2005 23:39:43 +0100; Jon Mason <jdmason@xxxxxxxxxx> : The content of the Config2 register could be interesting. -- Ueimor; /archives/netdev/2005-03/msg00600.html (9,451 bytes)
8. Re: [PATCH 1/5] r8169: auto detect 32-bit slot (score: 1): Author: Francois Romieu <romieu@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Thu, 10 Mar 2005 00:08:09 +0100; Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@xxxxxxxx> : If the systems are 64 bit, one would need to know how the driver behaves when DAC is forced and: 1) the Netgear card is in a 32 bit slot, dma to highmem is e; /archives/netdev/2005-03/msg00603.html (10,252 bytes)
9. Re: [PATCH 1/5] r8169: auto detect 32-bit slot (score: 1): Author: ncois Romieu <romieu@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Wed, 9 Mar 2005 15:16:11 -0800; Okay, the motivation was to try and get rid of the module parameter. I hate to see more parameters, and really don't like it when different drivers start to do things in different ways. Don't really; /archives/netdev/2005-03/msg00606.html (10,982 bytes)
10. Re: [PATCH 1/5] r8169: auto detect 32-bit slot (score: 1): Author: Greear <greearb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Thu, 10 Mar 2005 00:20:24 +0100; The concept of "64bit systems" is useless here anyways. Even on a 32bit system with highmem like i386 you can get >32bit addresses to deal with. One usecase for that would be sendfile() out of user s; /archives/netdev/2005-03/msg00607.html (11,061 bytes)
11. Re: [PATCH 1/5] r8169: auto detect 32-bit slot (score: 1): Author: xxxxxxxx>; Date: Thu, 10 Mar 2005 01:45:25 +0100; Andi Kleen <ak@xxxxxx> : The combination "32 bit system with weird addressing mode + r8169 adapter" has accounted for 0 bug/success report so far and I do not know a single tester for it anyway. When; /archives/netdev/2005-03/msg00623.html (10,681 bytes)
12. Re: [PATCH 1/5] r8169: auto detect 32-bit slot (score: 1): Author: xxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Wed, 9 Mar 2005 22:14:10 -0600; I did a quick test and my 2 adapters (integrated and stand-alone) fail the DAC test. + if ((sizeof(dma_addr_t) > 4) && + (RTL_R32(Config2) & (1<<3)) && + !pci_set_dma_mask(pdev, DMA_64BIT_MASK)) { F; /archives/netdev/2005-03/msg00629.html (9,722 bytes)
13. Re: [PATCH 1/5] r8169: auto detect 32-bit slot (score: 1): Author: xxxxxxx>; Date: Thu, 10 Mar 2005 12:17:03 +0100; Jon Mason <jdmason@xxxxxxxxxx> : Config2 can not be a replacement for "use_dac" then. It is not strictly necessary. Config2 ought to identify the 64bit slot at best. Thanks. -- Ueimor; /archives/netdev/2005-03/msg00648.html (9,804 bytes)
14. [PATCH 1/5] r8169: auto detect 32-bit slot (score: 1): Author: Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@xxxxxxxx>; Date: Wed, 9 Mar 2005 11:29:25 -0800; Change driver to auto-detect when the board is in a 32-bit PCI slot and avoid setting 64-bit dma mask. The module parameter method is no longer needed. Signed-off-by: Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@xx; /archives/netdev/2005-03/msg02474.html (10,301 bytes)
15. Re: [PATCH 1/5] r8169: auto detect 32-bit slot (score: 1): Author: Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@xxxxxxxxx>; Date: Wed, 09 Mar 2005 14:47:57 -0500; Signed-off-by: Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@xxxxxxxx> need to set consistent DMA mask too; /archives/netdev/2005-03/msg02484.html (9,209 bytes)
16. Re: [PATCH 1/5] r8169: auto detect 32-bit slot (score: 1): Author: Andi Kleen <ak@xxxxxx>; Date: Wed, 09 Mar 2005 21:16:05 +0100; Hmm? It doesn't support DAC? Normally on PCI a 64bit slot is not needed for 64bit addresses. -Andi; /archives/netdev/2005-03/msg02498.html (9,129 bytes)
17. Re: [PATCH 1/5] r8169: auto detect 32-bit slot (score: 1): Author: Francois Romieu <romieu@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Wed, 9 Mar 2005 22:40:23 +0100; Andi Kleen <ak@xxxxxx> : [...] It does but it is unstable for everybody (except Jon Mason, go figure) on amd64. Stephen, on which kind of system was this change tested ? -- Ueimor; /archives/netdev/2005-03/msg02513.html (9,192 bytes)
18. Re: [PATCH 1/5] r8169: auto detect 32-bit slot (score: 1): Author: Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@xxxxxxxx>; Date: Wed, 9 Mar 2005 13:55:30 -0800; I tested on old Celeron with Netgear card. I could try Amd and/or Xeon if you want.; /archives/netdev/2005-03/msg02516.html (9,688 bytes)
19. Re: [PATCH 1/5] r8169: auto detect 32-bit slot (score: 1): Author: Jon Mason <jdmason@xxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Wed, 9 Mar 2005 16:08:59 -0600; Just lucky, I guess. I can give it a try again. -- Jon Mason jdmason@xxxxxxxxxx; /archives/netdev/2005-03/msg02519.html (9,829 bytes)
20. Re: [PATCH 1/5] r8169: auto detect 32-bit slot (score: 1): Author: Francois Romieu <romieu@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Wed, 9 Mar 2005 23:39:43 +0100; Jon Mason <jdmason@xxxxxxxxxx> : [... The content of the Config2 register could be interesting. -- Ueimor; /archives/netdev/2005-03/msg02523.html (9,601 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 20
Page: [1] [2]