Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[PATCH\s+1\/2\]\s+xfs\:\s+clean\s+up\s+minor\s+sparse\s+warnings\s*$/: 5 ]

Total 5 documents matching your query.

1. [PATCH 1/2] xfs: clean up minor sparse warnings (score: 1)
Author: Dave Chinner <david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2011 11:07:41 +1100
Signed-off-by: Dave Chinner <dchinner@xxxxxxxxxx> -- fs/xfs/xfs_dir2_block.c | 1 + fs/xfs/xfs_ioctl.c | 10 ++++-- fs/xfs/xfs_ioctl32.c | 2 +- fs/xfs/xfs_iops.c | 13 ++++++++-- 4 files changed, 14 ins
/archives/xfs/2011-12/msg00374.html (10,653 bytes)

2. Re: [PATCH 1/2] xfs: clean up minor sparse warnings (score: 1)
Author: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2011 11:13:50 -0500
I think this one is complicated enough that is deserves a separate patch and a better description. For the other small bits: Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx>
/archives/xfs/2011-12/msg00391.html (9,919 bytes)

3. Re: [PATCH 1/2] xfs: clean up minor sparse warnings (score: 1)
Author: Dave Chinner <david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 22 Dec 2011 10:59:04 +1100
Ok, I've also just found a problem with it(*) so I'll separate it and resend when I've fixed it. Cheers, Dave. (*) did you know we actually have a test (079) that verifies this logic? I didn't until
/archives/xfs/2011-12/msg00397.html (10,326 bytes)

4. Re: [PATCH 1/2] xfs: clean up minor sparse warnings (score: 1)
Author: Ben Myers <bpm@xxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 22 Dec 2011 12:15:47 -0600
Hey Dave, Reviewed-by: Ben Myers <bpm@xxxxxxx> D'oh, I just reviewed this and didn't find the problem. Looking forward to your next rev to see what it is. -Ben
/archives/xfs/2011-12/msg00404.html (10,958 bytes)

5. Re: [PATCH 1/2] xfs: clean up minor sparse warnings (score: 1)
Author: Ben Myers <bpm@xxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 1 Feb 2012 12:33:40 -0600
Hey Dave, Did you resend this? Thanks, Ben
/archives/xfs/2012-02/msg00015.html (10,020 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu