Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[PATCH\s+1\/2\]\s+Allow\s+to\s+specify\s+unsupported\s+file\s+systems\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[PATCH\s+1\/2\]\s+Allow\s+to\s+specify\s+unsupported\s+file\s+systems\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. [PATCH 1/2] Allow to specify unsupported file systems (score: 1): Author: Lukas Czerner <lczerner@xxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Thu, 8 Jul 2010 17:23:51 +0200; As an addition to checking for supported file systems it would be nice to be able to specify unsupported file system. In combination with "generic" fs it can be useful. This patch adds that feature.; /archives/xfs/2010-07/msg00061.html (8,838 bytes)
2. Re: [PATCH 1/2] Allow to specify unsupported file systems (score: 1): Author: Alex Elder <aelder@xxxxxxx>; Date: Fri, 09 Jul 2010 08:14:19 -0500; Interesting idea, I agree it could be useful to exclude rather than have to enumerate everything. I don't think there's any need to make use of it except where needed--i.e., don't go changing things,; /archives/xfs/2010-07/msg00069.html (11,181 bytes)
3. Re: [PATCH 1/2] Allow to specify unsupported file systems (score: 1): Author: Lukas Czerner <lczerner@xxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Fri, 9 Jul 2010 15:28:51 +0200 (CEST); ok, agreed. Thanks. Oh, my bad, it should be !ext2. Do you want me to send it again ? --; /archives/xfs/2010-07/msg00071.html (12,233 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]