Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[PATCH\s+07\/15\]\s+refactor\s+xfs_btree

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[PATCH\s+07\/15\]\s+refactor\s+xfs_btree_readahead\s*$/: 15 ]

Total 15 documents matching your query.

1. [PATCH 07/15] refactor xfs_btree_readahead (score: 1): Author:; Date: Wed, 23 Jul 2008 22:08:59 +0200; Refactor xfs_btree_readahead to make it more readable: (a) remove the inline xfs_btree_readahead wrapper and move all checks out of line into the main routine. (b) factor out helpers for short/long f; /archives/xfs/2008-07/msg00425.html (16,338 bytes)
2. Re: [PATCH 07/15] refactor xfs_btree_readahead (score: 1): Author: xxxxx>; Date: Fri, 25 Jul 2008 09:36:55 +1000; Can i review my own code? ;) I've been wondering if this is the best naming convention - appending a single s or l to indicate short or long btree ops. Perhaps this would be better as xfs_btree_reada; /archives/xfs/2008-07/msg00484.html (9,460 bytes)
3. Re: [PATCH 07/15] refactor xfs_btree_readahead (score: 1): Author: xxxxx>; Date: Fri, 25 Jul 2008 06:14:18 +0200; Sure.. I'll see if I can find a saner name.; /archives/xfs/2008-07/msg00499.html (8,361 bytes)
4. Re: [PATCH 07/15] refactor xfs_btree_readahead (score: 1): Author: xxxxx>; Date: Mon, 28 Jul 2008 17:39:59 +0200; I've renamedthe helpers to xfs_btree_readahead_lblock / xfs_btree_readahead_slblock to match the naming for the other short / long block helpers.; /archives/xfs/2008-07/msg00552.html (8,115 bytes)
5. Re: [PATCH 07/15] refactor xfs_btree_readahead (score: 1): Author: xxxxx>; Date: Wed, 30 Jul 2008 17:35:22 +1000; Ok, that sounds reasonable. Cheers, Dave. -- Dave Chinner david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx; /archives/xfs/2008-07/msg00611.html (8,838 bytes)
6. [PATCH 07/15] refactor xfs_btree_readahead (score: 1): Author: xxxxxx>; Date: Wed, 23 Jul 2008 22:08:59 +0200; Refactor xfs_btree_readahead to make it more readable: (a) remove the inline xfs_btree_readahead wrapper and move all checks out of line into the main routine. (b) factor out helpers for short/long f; /archives/xfs/2008-07/msg01048.html (16,338 bytes)
7. Re: [PATCH 07/15] refactor xfs_btree_readahead (score: 1): Author: xxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Fri, 25 Jul 2008 09:36:55 +1000; Can i review my own code? ;) I've been wondering if this is the best naming convention - appending a single s or l to indicate short or long btree ops. Perhaps this would be better as xfs_btree_reada; /archives/xfs/2008-07/msg01107.html (9,460 bytes)
8. Re: [PATCH 07/15] refactor xfs_btree_readahead (score: 1): Author: rkgw@xxxxxxx>; Date: Fri, 25 Jul 2008 06:14:18 +0200; Sure.. I'll see if I can find a saner name.; /archives/xfs/2008-07/msg01122.html (8,361 bytes)
9. Re: [PATCH 07/15] refactor xfs_btree_readahead (score: 1): Author: ggin@xxxxxxx>; Date: Mon, 28 Jul 2008 17:39:59 +0200; I've renamedthe helpers to xfs_btree_readahead_lblock / xfs_btree_readahead_slblock to match the naming for the other short / long block helpers.; /archives/xfs/2008-07/msg01175.html (8,115 bytes)
10. Re: [PATCH 07/15] refactor xfs_btree_readahead (score: 1): Author: xxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Wed, 30 Jul 2008 17:35:22 +1000; Ok, that sounds reasonable. Cheers, Dave. -- Dave Chinner david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx; /archives/xfs/2008-07/msg01234.html (8,838 bytes)
11. [PATCH 07/15] refactor xfs_btree_readahead (score: 1): Author: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx>; Date: Wed, 23 Jul 2008 22:08:59 +0200; Refactor xfs_btree_readahead to make it more readable: (a) remove the inline xfs_btree_readahead wrapper and move all checks out of line into the main routine. (b) factor out helpers for short/long f; /archives/xfs/2008-07/msg01671.html (16,338 bytes)
12. Re: [PATCH 07/15] refactor xfs_btree_readahead (score: 1): Author: Dave Chinner <david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Fri, 25 Jul 2008 09:36:55 +1000; Can i review my own code? ;) I've been wondering if this is the best naming convention - appending a single s or l to indicate short or long btree ops. Perhaps this would be better as xfs_btree_reada; /archives/xfs/2008-07/msg01730.html (9,518 bytes)
13. Re: [PATCH 07/15] refactor xfs_btree_readahead (score: 1): Author: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx>; Date: Fri, 25 Jul 2008 06:14:18 +0200; Sure.. I'll see if I can find a saner name.; /archives/xfs/2008-07/msg01745.html (8,506 bytes)
14. Re: [PATCH 07/15] refactor xfs_btree_readahead (score: 1): Author: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx>; Date: Mon, 28 Jul 2008 17:39:59 +0200; I've renamedthe helpers to xfs_btree_readahead_lblock / xfs_btree_readahead_slblock to match the naming for the other short / long block helpers.; /archives/xfs/2008-07/msg01798.html (8,260 bytes)
15. Re: [PATCH 07/15] refactor xfs_btree_readahead (score: 1): Author: Dave Chinner <david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Wed, 30 Jul 2008 17:35:22 +1000; Ok, that sounds reasonable. Cheers, Dave. -- Dave Chinner david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx; /archives/xfs/2008-07/msg01857.html (8,985 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 15
Page: [1]