Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[PATCH\s+03\/12\]\s+xfs\:\s+modify\s+buffer\s+item\s+reference\s+counting\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[PATCH\s+03\/12\]\s+xfs\:\s+modify\s+buffer\s+item\s+reference\s+counting\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. [PATCH 03/12] xfs: modify buffer item reference counting (score: 1): Author: Dave Chinner <david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Fri, 7 May 2010 15:40:51 +1000; The buffer log item reference counts used to take reference for every transaction, similar to the pin counting. This is symmetric (like the pin/unpin) with respect to transaction completion, but with; /archives/xfs/2010-05/msg00068.html (16,406 bytes)
2. [PATCH 03/12] xfs: modify buffer item reference counting (score: 1): Author: Dave Chinner <david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Tue, 18 May 2010 09:24:19 +1000; The buffer log item reference counts used to take reference for every transaction, similar to the pin counting. This is symmetric (like the pin/unpin) with respect to transaction completion, but with; /archives/xfs/2010-05/msg00186.html (16,450 bytes)
3. Re: [PATCH 03/12] xfs: modify buffer item reference counting (score: 1): Author: Alex Elder <aelder@xxxxxxx>; Date: Wed, 19 May 2010 13:35:58 -0500; Doing the reference counts this way is an improvement. I have a question below. . . . . . . I notice that, unlike before, if you return via this path the XFS_BLI_HOLD flag will have been turned off.; /archives/xfs/2010-05/msg00252.html (13,383 bytes)
4. Re: [PATCH 03/12] xfs: modify buffer item reference counting (score: 1): Author: Dave Chinner <david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Thu, 20 May 2010 08:37:25 +1000; A buffer that has been marked stale is on that has been invalidated; they shouldn't get held across rolling transactions because they reference free space and cannot be reused without being reallocat; /archives/xfs/2010-05/msg00269.html (14,151 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]