Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[PATCH\s+0\/9\]\:\s+TCP\:\s+The\s+Road\s+to\s+Super\s+TSO\s*$/: 18 ]

Total 18 documents matching your query.

1. [PATCH 0/9]: TCP: The Road to Super TSO (score: 1)
Author: "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 06 Jun 2005 21:08:46 -0700 (PDT)
Some folks, notable the S2IO guys, get performance degradation from the Super TSO v2 patch (they get it from the first version as well). It's a real pain to spot what causes such things in such a hug
/archives/netdev/2005-06/msg00220.html (9,399 bytes)

2. Re: [PATCH 0/9]: TCP: The Road to Super TSO (score: 1)
Author: Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@xxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 06 Jun 2005 21:56:16 -0700
I'll merge these with the TCP infrastructure stuff and send it off to Andrew. Actually, it is more of fix the TCP infrastructure to match TSO + rc6 but you get the ida.
/archives/netdev/2005-06/msg00231.html (9,643 bytes)

3. Re: [PATCH 0/9]: TCP: The Road to Super TSO (score: 1)
Author: xxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 06 Jun 2005 22:51:33 -0700 (PDT)
Probably not a good idea, it's %75 of the implementation of Super TSO and totally conflicts with the super TSO patch. Probably best to keep the existing Super TSO stuff in there until I'm done with t
/archives/netdev/2005-06/msg00234.html (9,838 bytes)

4. Re: [PATCH 0/9]: TCP: The Road to Super TSO (score: 1)
Author: avem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 8 Jun 2005 17:40:10 -0400
insmod ipw2100
/archives/netdev/2005-06/msg00303.html (9,918 bytes)

5. Re: [PATCH 0/9]: TCP: The Road to Super TSO (score: 1)
Author: xxxx>
Date: Wed, 08 Jun 2005 14:49:06 -0700 (PDT)
etwork to be br
/archives/netdev/2005-06/msg00306.html (10,247 bytes)

6. Re: [PATCH 0/9]: TCP: The Road to Super TSO (score: 1)
Author: xxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 9 Jun 2005 08:10:47 +1000
make use of it?
/archives/netdev/2005-06/msg00308.html (9,935 bytes)

7. RE: [PATCH 0/9]: TCP: The Road to Super TSO (score: 1)
Author: xxxxx>
Date: Wed, 8 Jun 2005 15:19:34 -0700
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
/archives/netdev/2005-06/msg00309.html (10,745 bytes)

8. Re: [PATCH 0/9]: TCP: The Road to Super TSO (score: 1)
Author: u Yi <yi.zhu@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 8 Jun 2005 21:30:27 -0700
and ker-blammo.
/archives/netdev/2005-06/msg00315.html (9,374 bytes)

9. RE: [PATCH 0/9]: TCP: The Road to Super TSO (score: 1)
Author: Leonid Grossman" <leonid.grossman@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 8 Jun 2005 21:55:13 -0700
done by editing
/archives/netdev/2005-06/msg00316.html (17,036 bytes)

10. [PATCH 0/9]: TCP: The Road to Super TSO (score: 1)
Author: "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 06 Jun 2005 21:08:46 -0700 (PDT)
Some folks, notable the S2IO guys, get performance degradation from the Super TSO v2 patch (they get it from the first version as well). It's a real pain to spot what causes such things in such a hug
/archives/netdev/2005-06/msg00821.html (9,399 bytes)

11. Re: [PATCH 0/9]: TCP: The Road to Super TSO (score: 1)
Author: Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@xxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 06 Jun 2005 21:56:16 -0700
I'll merge these with the TCP infrastructure stuff and send it off to Andrew. Actually, it is more of fix the TCP infrastructure to match TSO + rc6 but you get the ida.
/archives/netdev/2005-06/msg00832.html (9,717 bytes)

12. Re: [PATCH 0/9]: TCP: The Road to Super TSO (score: 1)
Author: "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 06 Jun 2005 22:51:33 -0700 (PDT)
Probably not a good idea, it's %75 of the implementation of Super TSO and totally conflicts with the super TSO patch. Probably best to keep the existing Super TSO stuff in there until I'm done with t
/archives/netdev/2005-06/msg00835.html (9,924 bytes)

13. Re: [PATCH 0/9]: TCP: The Road to Super TSO (score: 1)
Author: John Heffner <jheffner@xxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 8 Jun 2005 17:40:10 -0400
I'm curious about the details of this. Is there decreased performance relative to current TSO? Relative to no TSO? Sending to just one receiver or many, and is it receiver limited? -John
/archives/netdev/2005-06/msg00904.html (9,994 bytes)

14. Re: [PATCH 0/9]: TCP: The Road to Super TSO (score: 1)
Author: "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 08 Jun 2005 14:49:06 -0700 (PDT)
The receiver is limited in their tests. No current generation systems can fill a 10gbit pipe fully, especially at 1500 byte MTU. Performance went down, with both TSO enabled and disabled, compared to
/archives/netdev/2005-06/msg00907.html (10,355 bytes)

15. Re: [PATCH 0/9]: TCP: The Road to Super TSO (score: 1)
Author: Herbert Xu <herbert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 9 Jun 2005 08:10:47 +1000
What was the receiver running? Was the performance degradation more pronounced with TSO enabled? -- Visit Openswan at http://www.openswan.org/ Email: Herbert Xu ~{PmV>HI~} <herbert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
/archives/netdev/2005-06/msg00909.html (10,129 bytes)

16. RE: [PATCH 0/9]: TCP: The Road to Super TSO (score: 1)
Author: "Leonid Grossman" <leonid.grossman@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 8 Jun 2005 15:19:34 -0700
With jumbo frames, a single receiver can handle 10GbE line rate. With 1500 mtu, a single receiver becomes a bottleneck. I will forward the numbers later today.
/archives/netdev/2005-06/msg00910.html (10,798 bytes)

17. Re: [PATCH 0/9]: TCP: The Road to Super TSO (score: 1)
Author: "Leonid Grossman" <leonid.grossman@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 8 Jun 2005 21:30:27 -0700
FYI, looks like the code in the nine patches is not responsible for the performance drop; the problem is elsewhere in the Super TSO code. David, I have applied all 9 patches (6-9 are done by editing
/archives/netdev/2005-06/msg00916.html (9,389 bytes)

18. RE: [PATCH 0/9]: TCP: The Road to Super TSO (score: 1)
Author: "Leonid Grossman" <leonid.grossman@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 8 Jun 2005 21:55:13 -0700
Some of the original data that we got couple weeks ago are attached. On questions from Herbert and others: - The performance drop from the "super-TSO" with TSO OFF is marginal, with TSO ON is quite n
/archives/netdev/2005-06/msg00917.html (17,126 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu