Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[PATCH\s+0\/6\]\s+writeback\:\s+tracing\s+and\s+fixes\s+V4\s*$/: 5 ]

Total 5 documents matching your query.

1. [PATCH 0/6] writeback: tracing and fixes V4 (score: 1)
Author: Dave Chinner <david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 8 Jun 2010 10:38:01 +1000
Hi Linus, Can you please consider this patch series for 2.6.35? If you don't want the tracing at this stage of the release process, I can redo the series with just the bug fixes. However, given the r
/archives/xfs/2010-06/msg00064.html (10,260 bytes)

2. Re: [PATCH 0/6] writeback: tracing and fixes V4 (score: 1)
Author: Nick Piggin <npiggin@xxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 8 Jun 2010 15:44:46 +1000
Oh, I don't have a problem with your EOF fix being merged now, as Jan's patch isn't suitable for 2.6.35.
/archives/xfs/2010-06/msg00072.html (9,268 bytes)

3. Re: [PATCH 0/6] writeback: tracing and fixes V4 (score: 1)
Author: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 8 Jun 2010 10:41:28 -0700 (PDT)
Yeah, no. See the several lkml discussions and the -rc2 announcement about how I do _not_ intend to merge anything even remotely "new code" this time around. So purely regression fixes and serious bu
/archives/xfs/2010-06/msg00077.html (9,738 bytes)

4. Re: [PATCH 0/6] writeback: tracing and fixes V4 (score: 1)
Author: Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 8 Jun 2010 10:50:18 -0700
Linus would have merged it. But his evil twin got ahold of the keyboard.
/archives/xfs/2010-06/msg00078.html (9,965 bytes)

5. Re: [PATCH 0/6] writeback: tracing and fixes V4 (score: 1)
Author: Dave Chinner <david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 9 Jun 2010 08:46:15 +1000
No worries, I'll re-order the series and send you just the bug fixes later this morning. Cheers, Dave. -- Dave Chinner david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
/archives/xfs/2010-06/msg00082.html (10,003 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 5
Page: [1]
This search system is powered by Namazu