- 1. [PATCH 0/12] xfs: delayed logging V6 (score: 1)
- Author: Dave Chinner <david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 18 May 2010 09:24:16 +1000
- Hi Folks, This is version 6 of the delayed logging series and is the first release candidate for incluion in the xfs-dev tree and 2.6.35-rc1. I won't repeat everything about what it is, just point yo
- /archives/xfs/2010-05/msg00185.html (14,443 bytes)
- 2. Re: [PATCH 0/12] xfs: delayed logging V6 (score: 1)
- Author: Alex Elder <aelder@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 21 May 2010 16:21:21 -0500
- I've reviewed the whole series. I see that you rebased and updated the code on your delayed-logging branch so I'll re-pull the updated version and after I run it through some testing of my own I will
- /archives/xfs/2010-05/msg00310.html (9,632 bytes)
- 3. Re: [PATCH 0/12] xfs: delayed logging V6 (score: 1)
- Author: Dave Chinner <david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 22 May 2010 10:39:22 +1000
- Yeah, it addresses the busy extent tracking bug you found. I'm still testing it myself, but I haven't found any issues yet. Changelog is: Changes for V7: o fixed typos in comments in busy extent trac
- /archives/xfs/2010-05/msg00317.html (10,031 bytes)
- 4. Re: [PATCH 0/12] xfs: delayed logging V6 (score: 1)
- Author: Dave Chinner <david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 24 May 2010 10:30:39 +1000
- BTW, here's a couple of quick benchmarks I've run over the last couple of days to check comparitive performance. I found that the previous scalability testing I did was limited by two factors: 1. Onl
- /archives/xfs/2010-05/msg00329.html (12,600 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu