- 1. [PATCH 0/11] xfs: delayed logging (score: 1)
- Author: Dave Chinner <david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 6 May 2010 11:45:40 +1000
- Hi Folks, This is version 4 of the delayed logging series. I won't repeat everything about what it is, just point you here: http://marc.info/?l=linux-xfs&m=126862777118946&w=2 for the description, an
- /archives/xfs/2010-05/msg00036.html (13,089 bytes)
- 2. Re: [PATCH 0/11] xfs: delayed logging (score: 1)
- Author: Dave Chinner <david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 6 May 2010 23:26:41 +1000
- Ok, so I'm still getting assert failures, but they are much harder to hit. However, here's the fragment of a trace that points out why delayed logging is now tripping over this problem: $ grep _busy:
- /archives/xfs/2010-05/msg00047.html (15,775 bytes)
- 3. Re: [PATCH 0/11] xfs: delayed logging (score: 1)
- Author: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 6 May 2010 15:12:18 -0400
- True, the busy extents get spliced over to the cil context, so they outlive the transaction structure. Sounds fine to me. I'm not a fan of exporting the tid, but it seems like there's no good way ar
- /archives/xfs/2010-05/msg00049.html (10,374 bytes)
- 4. Re: [PATCH 0/11] xfs: delayed logging (score: 1)
- Author: Dave Chinner <david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 7 May 2010 09:54:01 +1000
- Yeah, that's a good idea. Will do. Cheers, Dave. -- Dave Chinner david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- /archives/xfs/2010-05/msg00058.html (10,666 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu