Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[PATCH\]sk98lin\s+ethtool\s+support\s*$/: 18 ]

Total 18 documents matching your query.

1. Re: [PATCH]sk98lin ethtool support (score: 1)
Author: "Feldman, Scott" <scott.feldman@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 2 Jan 2004 00:00:41 -0800 (PST)
If the tool reports the results of running the h/w checks, then you can use ETHTOOL_TEST. The summary results of all the tests is reported as PASS/FAIL. Not sure if your tool needs to do more... -sco
/archives/netdev/2004-01/msg00005.html (8,343 bytes)

2. Re: [PATCH]sk98lin ethtool support (score: 1)
Author: Mirko Lindner <demon@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 02 Jan 2004 14:23:10 +0000
Feldman, Scott wrote: On Tue, 30 Dec 2003, Mirko Lindner wrote: Make sure you don't duplicate any ethtool functions. We don't need a NIC-specific diag tool either ;-) ethtool is the preferred method
/archives/netdev/2004-01/msg00007.html (9,461 bytes)

3. [PATCH]sk98lin ethtool support (score: 1)
Author: <jgarzik@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: 30 Dec 2003 19:24:27 +0900
The following patch introduces the ethtool support for the sk98lin driver. Only 4 operations are supported for now. The patch is against vanilla 2.6.0. As I dont have the hardware with me, I could d
/archives/netdev/2003-12/msg00367.html (12,047 bytes)

4. Re: [PATCH]sk98lin ethtool support (score: 1)
Author: "Krishnakumar. R" <krishnakumar@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 30 Dec 2003 12:27:04 +0000
Thanks. I'll complete the support as soon I'm back in the office. All driver statistics are also available in the the proc system under /proc/net/sk98lin/ Mirko Krishnakumar. R wrote: Hi, The followi
/archives/netdev/2003-12/msg00368.html (13,032 bytes)

5. Re: [PATCH]sk98lin ethtool support (score: 1)
Author: xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 30 Dec 2003 14:29:55 +0200
Thanks, Krishna and Mirco. That would be a great addition to the driver. I think having most driver info available via ethtool is a very important, at least for systems with multiple different NICs,
/archives/netdev/2003-12/msg00369.html (14,117 bytes)

6. Re: [PATCH]sk98lin ethtool support (score: 1)
Author: @xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 30 Dec 2003 10:14:33 -0500
Mirko Lindner wrote: Thanks. I'll complete the support as soon I'm back in the office. All driver statistics are also available in the the proc system under /proc/net/sk98lin/ procfs statistics are d
/archives/netdev/2003-12/msg00370.html (8,551 bytes)

7. Re: [PATCH]sk98lin ethtool support (score: 1)
Author: ler" <davem@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 31 Dec 2003 01:15:31 +0000
Jeff Garzik wrote: Mirko Lindner wrote: Thanks. I'll complete the support as soon I'm back in the office. All driver statistics are also available in the the proc system under /proc/net/sk98lin/ proc
/archives/netdev/2003-12/msg00382.html (9,229 bytes)

8. Re: [PATCH]sk98lin ethtool support (score: 1)
Author: h <fubar@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 31 Dec 2003 01:37:22 +0000
Well, understood, but we don't need vendor-specific, non-standard statistics when there is a standard method to export these statistics (ETHTOOl_GSTATS). I agree with you. Make sure you don't duplic
/archives/netdev/2003-12/msg00383.html (9,454 bytes)

9. Re: [PATCH]sk98lin ethtool support (score: 1)
Author: avid S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 30 Dec 2003 19:23:41 -0500
Mirko Lindner wrote: Jeff Garzik wrote: Mirko Lindner wrote: Thanks. I'll complete the support as soon I'm back in the office. All driver statistics are also available in the the proc system under /p
/archives/netdev/2003-12/msg00397.html (10,151 bytes)

10. Re: [PATCH]sk98lin ethtool support (score: 1)
Author: "Feldman, Scott" <scott.feldman@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 2 Jan 2004 00:00:41 -0800 (PST)
If the tool reports the results of running the h/w checks, then you can use ETHTOOL_TEST. The summary results of all the tests is reported as PASS/FAIL. Not sure if your tool needs to do more... -sco
/archives/netdev/2004-01/msg00713.html (8,419 bytes)

11. Re: [PATCH]sk98lin ethtool support (score: 1)
Author: Mirko Lindner <demon@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 02 Jan 2004 14:23:10 +0000
Make sure you don't duplicate any ethtool functions. We don't need a NIC-specific diag tool either ;-) ethtool is the preferred method moving forward, as it's already shipping in most Linux distros.
/archives/netdev/2004-01/msg00715.html (9,529 bytes)

12. [PATCH]sk98lin ethtool support (score: 1)
Author: "Krishnakumar. R" <krishnakumar@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: 30 Dec 2003 19:24:27 +0900
Hi, The following patch introduces the ethtool support for the sk98lin driver. Only 4 operations are supported for now. The patch is against vanilla 2.6.0. As I dont have the hardware with me, I coul
/archives/netdev/2003-12/msg00766.html (12,062 bytes)

13. Re: [PATCH]sk98lin ethtool support (score: 1)
Author: Mirko Lindner <demon@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 30 Dec 2003 12:27:04 +0000
Thanks. I'll complete the support as soon I'm back in the office. All driver statistics are also available in the the proc system under /proc/net/sk98lin/ Mirko The following patch introduces the eth
/archives/netdev/2003-12/msg00767.html (13,149 bytes)

14. Re: [PATCH]sk98lin ethtool support (score: 1)
Author: Felix Radensky <felix@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 30 Dec 2003 14:29:55 +0200
Thanks, Krishna and Mirco. That would be a great addition to the driver. I think having most driver info available via ethtool is a very important, at least for systems with multiple different NICs,
/archives/netdev/2003-12/msg00768.html (14,085 bytes)

15. Re: [PATCH]sk98lin ethtool support (score: 1)
Author: Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 30 Dec 2003 10:14:33 -0500
procfs statistics are deprecated... Jeff
/archives/netdev/2003-12/msg00769.html (8,554 bytes)

16. Re: [PATCH]sk98lin ethtool support (score: 1)
Author: Mirko Lindner <demon@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 31 Dec 2003 01:15:31 +0000
Thanks. I'll complete the support as soon I'm back in the office. All driver statistics are also available in the the proc system under /proc/net/sk98lin/ procfs statistics are deprecated... Jeff Jef
/archives/netdev/2003-12/msg00781.html (9,299 bytes)

17. Re: [PATCH]sk98lin ethtool support (score: 1)
Author: Mirko Lindner <demon@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 31 Dec 2003 01:37:22 +0000
Jeff, Well, understood, but we don't need vendor-specific, non-standard statistics when there is a standard method to export these statistics (ETHTOOl_GSTATS). I agree with you. Make sure you don't d
/archives/netdev/2003-12/msg00782.html (9,678 bytes)

18. Re: [PATCH]sk98lin ethtool support (score: 1)
Author: Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 30 Dec 2003 19:23:41 -0500
Thanks. I'll complete the support as soon I'm back in the office. All driver statistics are also available in the the proc system under /proc/net/sk98lin/ procfs statistics are deprecated... Jeff Jef
/archives/netdev/2003-12/msg00796.html (10,278 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu