Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[PATCH\]Add\s+new\s+IPv6\s+MIBs\s+counters\s+support\s+through\s+netlink\s*$/: 22 ]

Total 22 documents matching your query.

1. _tx (score: 1)
Author: x>
Date: Wed, 26 May 2004 13:10:05 -0700
This patch implements both per interface and global new IPv6 MIBs counters through netlink based on new IP MIBs draft, 64 bit counters are not supported here because of performance issues. It coexist
/archives/netdev/2004-05/msg00354.html (9,577 bytes)

2. Pv6 (score: 1)
Author: xxxxx>
Date: Wed, 26 May 2004 13:22:15 -0700
Just to clarify, you named the struct ip_stats because we will use this eventually for ipv4 as well? Otherwise we should name it ip6_stats or something like that. Otherwise I think your patch is fine
/archives/netdev/2004-05/msg00356.html (9,703 bytes)

3. rch (score: 1)
Author: xxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 26 May 2004 13:42:23 -0700
Yes, same structure ip_stats applys to IPv4 as well. Thanks Shirley Ma IBM Linux Technology Center 15300 SW Koll Parkway Beaverton, OR 97006-6063 Phone: (503) 578-7638 FAX: (503) 578-3228
/archives/netdev/2004-05/msg00359.html (9,070 bytes)

4. rch (score: 1)
Author: xxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 26 May 2004 13:44:15 -0700
Great, patch applied.
/archives/netdev/2004-05/msg00361.html (9,257 bytes)

5. e() (score: 1)
Author: x>
Date: Thu, 27 May 2004 08:08:28 +0900 (JST)
I failed to comment because I've just waken up... Hmm, why are you so hurrying? It on -rc stage and 2.6.7 is coming. Each people should moderate yourself... Sorry, please exclude it for now. Comments
/archives/netdev/2004-05/msg00371.html (10,672 bytes)

6. ink (score: 1)
Author: ideaki / 吉藤英明 <yoshfuji@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 27 May 2004 08:22:06 +0900 (JST)
To clarify... (because of u64 things) (because of route things) --yoshfuji
/archives/netdev/2004-05/msg00372.html (10,137 bytes)

7. ink (score: 1)
Author: HIFUJI Hideaki / 吉藤英明 <yoshfuji@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 26 May 2004 16:22:23 -0700
I've only added it to my tree and have not pushed it off to Linus. I was in fact waiting for your feedback to occur first :-) I see no way we will get the proper u64 support working any time soon, it
/archives/netdev/2004-05/msg00373.html (10,093 bytes)

8. ink (score: 1)
Author: ji@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 26 May 2004 16:32:04 -0700
Thanks for you comments! not make sense to add It's not good to add new counters to the end of the old structure. The mib number and offset will be wrong. (I rember that you said that) we should add
/archives/netdev/2004-05/msg00374.html (10,598 bytes)

9. ink (score: 1)
Author: Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 26 May 2004 16:34:04 -0700
feature integrated and given current knowledge it is the best working implementation we can come up with at this time. Appreciate your understanding. Maitaining this patch takes time. Thanks Shirley
/archives/netdev/2004-05/msg00375.html (9,332 bytes)

10. _tx (score: 1)
Author: S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 27 May 2004 08:58:12 +0900 (JST)
I don't think so. But, even if so, we can add only missing stats. okay. I strongly do not want to change interface twice to support these new statistics. --yoshfuji @ driving traffic jam
/archives/netdev/2004-05/msg00379.html (10,874 bytes)

11. ink (score: 1)
Author: xxx>
Date: Wed, 26 May 2004 17:01:40 -0700
As a side note, I am worried about investing so much effort and expense if by the time we make 64-bit atomic counters work acceptably on 32-bit platforms we are all running Opteron machines :-)
/archives/netdev/2004-05/msg00380.html (9,958 bytes)

12. [PATCH]Add new IPv6 MIBs counters support through netlink (score: 1)
Author: Shirley Ma <mashirle@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 26 May 2004 13:10:05 -0700
This patch implements both per interface and global new IPv6 MIBs counters through netlink based on new IP MIBs draft, 64 bit counters are not supported here because of performance issues. It coexist
/archives/netdev/2004-05/msg00872.html (9,796 bytes)

13. Re: [PATCH]Add new IPv6 MIBs counters support through netlink (score: 1)
Author: "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 26 May 2004 13:22:15 -0700
Just to clarify, you named the struct ip_stats because we will use this eventually for ipv4 as well? Otherwise we should name it ip6_stats or something like that. Otherwise I think your patch is fine
/archives/netdev/2004-05/msg00874.html (9,929 bytes)

14. Re: [PATCH]Add new IPv6 MIBs counters support through netlink (score: 1)
Author: Shirley Ma <xma@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 26 May 2004 13:42:23 -0700
Yes, same structure ip_stats applys to IPv4 as well. Thanks Shirley Ma IBM Linux Technology Center 15300 SW Koll Parkway Beaverton, OR 97006-6063 Phone: (503) 578-7638 FAX: (503) 578-3228
/archives/netdev/2004-05/msg00877.html (9,107 bytes)

15. Re: [PATCH]Add new IPv6 MIBs counters support through netlink (score: 1)
Author: "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 26 May 2004 13:44:15 -0700
Great, patch applied.
/archives/netdev/2004-05/msg00879.html (9,424 bytes)

16. Re: [PATCH]Add new IPv6 MIBs counters support through netlink (score: 1)
Author: YOSHIFUJI Hideaki / <yoshfuji@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 27 May 2004 08:08:28 +0900 (JST)
I failed to comment because I've just waken up... Hmm, why are you so hurrying? It on -rc stage and 2.6.7 is coming. Each people should moderate yourself... Sorry, please exclude it for now. Comments
/archives/netdev/2004-05/msg00889.html (10,848 bytes)

17. Re: [PATCH]Add new IPv6 MIBs counters support through netlink (score: 1)
Author: YOSHIFUJI Hideaki / <yoshfuji@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 27 May 2004 08:22:06 +0900 (JST)
To clarify... (because of u64 things) (because of route things) --yoshfuji
/archives/netdev/2004-05/msg00890.html (10,321 bytes)

18. Re: [PATCH]Add new IPv6 MIBs counters support through netlink (score: 1)
Author: "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 26 May 2004 16:22:23 -0700
I've only added it to my tree and have not pushed it off to Linus. I was in fact waiting for your feedback to occur first :-) I see no way we will get the proper u64 support working any time soon, it
/archives/netdev/2004-05/msg00891.html (10,314 bytes)

19. Re: [PATCH]Add new IPv6 MIBs counters support through netlink (score: 1)
Author: Shirley Ma <xma@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 26 May 2004 16:32:04 -0700
Hi,Yoshifuji Thanks for you comments! not make sense to add It's not good to add new counters to the end of the old structure. The mib number and offset will be wrong. (I rember that you said that) w
/archives/netdev/2004-05/msg00892.html (10,639 bytes)

20. Re: [PATCH]Add new IPv6 MIBs counters support through netlink (score: 1)
Author: Shirley Ma <xma@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 26 May 2004 16:34:04 -0700
feature integrated and given current knowledge it is the best working implementation we can come up with at this time. Appreciate your understanding. Maitaining this patch takes time. Thanks Shirley
/archives/netdev/2004-05/msg00893.html (9,369 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu