Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[PATCH\]\s+xfstests\:\s+allow\s+deeper\s+symlink\s+recursion\s+in\s+005\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[PATCH\]\s+xfstests\:\s+allow\s+deeper\s+symlink\s+recursion\s+in\s+005\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. [PATCH] xfstests: allow deeper symlink recursion in 005 (score: 1): Author: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Sun, 10 Apr 2011 16:03:32 -0400; Recent kernels allow more than 40 nested symlinks, so up the limit to still reproduce a failure. Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx> Index: xfstests-dev/005 == -- xfstests-dev.orig/005 2011; /archives/xfs/2011-04/msg00095.html (7,142 bytes)
2. Re: [PATCH] xfstests: allow deeper symlink recursion in 005 (score: 1): Author: Dave Chinner <david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Mon, 11 Apr 2011 11:49:33 +1000; Looks good. Reviewed-by: Dave Chinner <dchinner@xxxxxxxxxx> -- Dave Chinner david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx; /archives/xfs/2011-04/msg00096.html (7,567 bytes)
3. Re: [PATCH] xfstests: allow deeper symlink recursion in 005 (score: 1): Author: Alex Elder <aelder@xxxxxxx>; Date: Wed, 13 Apr 2011 12:24:46 -0500; Looks good, and I confirm it fixes the output mismatch on 005. Reviewed-by: Alex Elder <aelder@xxxxxxx>; /archives/xfs/2011-04/msg00140.html (7,490 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]