Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[PATCH\]\s+xfs_repair\:\s+validate\s+inode\s+di_flaaags\s+field\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. [PATCH] xfs_repair: validate inode di_flaaags field (score: 1)
Author: Alex Elder <aelder@xxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 22 Feb 2011 14:43:39 -0600
(I may have missed it, but I don't believe Dave posted this patch so I'm doing it for him to get it on the list. -Alex) xfs-reapir is not validating the di_flags field in the inode for sanity. Block
/archives/xfs/2011-02/msg00208.html (6,998 bytes)

2. Re: [PATCH] xfs_repair: validate inode di_flaaags field (score: 1)
Author: Alex Elder <aelder@xxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 22 Feb 2011 14:45:56 -0600
I guess I should have left it up to Dave... repair/dinode.c | 62 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 files changed, 62 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) diff --git a/repair/dinode.c
/archives/xfs/2011-02/msg00209.html (11,284 bytes)

3. Re: [PATCH] xfs_repair: validate inode di_flaaags field (score: 1)
Author: Alex Elder <aelder@xxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 22 Feb 2011 15:39:05 -0600
Turns out this was on the list, it just was sent as a "will you please try this patch" message on the subject of "XFS internal error xfs_iformat(realtime) even after xfs_repair." Anyway, now I've rev
/archives/xfs/2011-02/msg00211.html (8,588 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu