Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[PATCH\]\s+xfs\:\s+zero\s+proper\s+structure\s+size\s+for\s+geometry\s+calls\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[PATCH\]\s+xfs\:\s+zero\s+proper\s+structure\s+size\s+for\s+geometry\s+calls\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. [PATCH] xfs: zero proper structure size for geometry calls (score: 1): Author: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Mon, 28 Feb 2011 19:37:50 -0600; commit 493f3358cb289ccf716c5a14fa5bb52ab75943e5 added: + memset(geo, 0, sizeof(*geo)); but unfortunately we're dealing with a cast pointer here, and the caller may actually have a smaller structure o; /archives/xfs/2011-02/msg00303.html (10,928 bytes)
2. Re: [PATCH] xfs: zero proper structure size for geometry calls (score: 1): Author: Dave Chinner <david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Tue, 1 Mar 2011 13:59:44 +1100; I'd prefer that sizeof(fsgeo) is used here. That means if the type is changed, then memset doesn't need to be. Same for all the rest of the memset calls. Otherwise, Reviewed-by: Dave Chinner <dchinne; /archives/xfs/2011-02/msg00305.html (10,492 bytes)
3. Re: [PATCH] xfs: zero proper structure size for geometry calls (score: 1): Author: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Mon, 28 Feb 2011 21:01:05 -0600; Ok, I can resend, I was going to do that but most of xfs uses the other style so wasn't sure. -Eric; /archives/xfs/2011-02/msg00306.html (10,945 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]