Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[PATCH\]\s+xfs\:\s+validate\s+quota\s+log\s+items\s+during\s+log\s+recovery\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[PATCH\]\s+xfs\:\s+validate\s+quota\s+log\s+items\s+during\s+log\s+recovery\s*$/: 8 ]

Total 8 documents matching your query.

1. [PATCH] xfs: validate quota log items during log recovery (score: 1): Author: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Tue, 3 Mar 2009 12:54:27 -0500; Arkadiusz has been seeing really strange crashes in xfs_qm_dqcheck that I can only explain by a log item beeing too smal to actually fit the xfs_dqblk_t we're dereferencing all over xfs_qm_dqcheck. S; /archives/xfs/2009-03/msg00013.html (8,948 bytes)
2. Re: [PATCH] xfs: validate quota log items during log recovery (score: 1): Author: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Mon, 16 Mar 2009 03:54:07 -0400; ping? --end quoted text--; /archives/xfs/2009-03/msg00165.html (10,897 bytes)
3. Re: [PATCH] xfs: validate quota log items during log recovery (score: 1): Author: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Sun, 29 Mar 2009 03:42:46 -0400; ping^2? --end quoted text--; /archives/xfs/2009-03/msg00293.html (11,871 bytes)
4. Re: [PATCH] xfs: validate quota log items during log recovery (score: 1): Author: Arkadiusz Miskiewicz <arekm@xxxxxxxx>; Date: Sat, 4 Apr 2009 13:59:12 +0200; Unfortunately this validation doesn't cover my case. I still got oops even with the patch applied 1). I also tried xfs debug enabled kernel 2) 1) oops with "[PATCH] xfs: validate quota log items duri; /archives/xfs/2009-04/msg00018.html (25,792 bytes)
5. Re: [PATCH] xfs: validate quota log items during log recovery (score: 1): Author: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Tue, 26 May 2009 05:11:27 -0400; ping^3? --end quoted text--; /archives/xfs/2009-05/msg00222.html (12,517 bytes)
6. Re: [PATCH] xfs: validate quota log items during log recovery (score: 1): Author: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Tue, 26 May 2009 11:07:56 -0500; ^^being too small^^ Shouldn't this differentiate between i_addr == NULL and i_len too small, though? While we're at it anyway... Maybe: + "XFS: dquot null addr (%p) or len too small (%d) in %s." + it; /archives/xfs/2009-05/msg00227.html (11,586 bytes)
7. Re: [PATCH] xfs: validate quota log items during log recovery (score: 1): Author: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Wed, 27 May 2009 05:17:34 -0400; Thanks, corrected. I've split both into individual checks and used __func__ to print the function instead of hardconding it. Yeah, same action a a xfs_qm_dqcheck failure. Error handling here probably; /archives/xfs/2009-05/msg00240.html (12,761 bytes)
8. Re: [PATCH] xfs: validate quota log items during log recovery (score: 1): Author: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Wed, 27 May 2009 14:06:53 -0500; ^^small ;) A bit more verbose now isn't it, but oh well :) Reviewed-by: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxxxxxx>; /archives/xfs/2009-05/msg00258.html (12,430 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 8
Page: [1]