Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[PATCH\]\s+xfs\:\s+negative

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[PATCH\]\s+xfs\:\s+negative_icount\.patch\s+V2\s*$/: 2 ]

Total 2 documents matching your query.

1. [PATCH] xfs: negative_icount.patch V2 (score: 1): Author: Stuart Brodsky <sbrodsky@xxxxxxx>; Date: Thu, 29 Jul 2010 15:18:38 -0500; can somebody please review this for me? Thanks, -- Because of delayed updates to sb_icount field in the super block, it is possible to allocate over maxicount number of inodes. This causes the arithm; /archives/xfs/2010-07/msg00385.html (8,107 bytes)
2. Re: [PATCH] xfs: negative_icount.patch V2 (score: 1): Author: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Thu, 29 Jul 2010 16:55:14 -0400; For a start it's still missing a useful subject line. Very bad naming of the variable, something like ffree would bebetter. Also to fit with the rest of XFS it probably should be a __int64_t. wrong i; /archives/xfs/2010-07/msg00386.html (7,444 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 2
Page: [1]