- 1. [PATCH] xfs: kill off xfs_printk() (score: 1)
- Author: Alex Elder <aelder@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 3 May 2011 15:14:44 -0500
- xfs_alert_tag() can be defined using xfs_alert(), and thereby avoid using xfs_printk() altogether. This is the only remaining use of xfs_printk(), so changing it this way means xfs_printk() can simpl
- /archives/xfs/2011-05/msg00063.html (9,822 bytes)
- 2. Re: [PATCH] xfs: kill off xfs_printk() (score: 1)
- Author: Alex Elder <aelder@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 3 May 2011 15:21:22 -0500
- . . . In case it wasn't clear from my text, xfs_printk() can simply be eliminated. (I don't know how all those duplicates got in there.)
- /archives/xfs/2011-05/msg00064.html (7,966 bytes)
- 3. Re: [PATCH] xfs: kill off xfs_printk() (score: 1)
- Author: Joe Perches <joe@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 03 May 2011 13:27:24 -0700
- Recursion overflow?
- /archives/xfs/2011-05/msg00065.html (7,792 bytes)
- 4. Re: [PATCH] xfs: kill off xfs_printk() (score: 1)
- Author: Dave Chinner <david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 4 May 2011 10:44:54 +1000
- If you are going to credit Joe as the original source of the patch in the commit (i.e. via the "From:" tag), you probably should copy in his original Signed-off-by tag as well.... Cheers, Dave. -- Da
- /archives/xfs/2011-05/msg00068.html (8,716 bytes)
- 5. Re: [PATCH] xfs: kill off xfs_printk() (score: 1)
- Author: Alex Elder <aelder@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 4 May 2011 09:29:58 -0500
- Honestly I wasn't sure about that. Since I changed it I kind of hoped he'd acknowledge or sign off on it. I guess I'm still learning about the conventions for signing off on things. I want to give al
- /archives/xfs/2011-05/msg00083.html (9,573 bytes)
- 6. Re: [PATCH] xfs: kill off xfs_printk() (score: 1)
- Author: Joe Perches <joe@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 04 May 2011 07:54:11 -0700
- When I modify a patch to my taste I use Original-patch-by: Anyway, no worries to me, whatever you want. Acked-by: Joe Perches <joe@xxxxxxxxxxx> Signed-off-by: Joe Perches <joe@xxxxxxxxxxx> Original-p
- /archives/xfs/2011-05/msg00084.html (8,535 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu