Author: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 19 Apr 2003 20:34:08 -0300
Hi David, Please consider pulling from: bk://kernel.bkbits.net/acme/net-2.5 It has your suggestions implemented. Waiting for OK so that I can submit the conversion for the protocols. - Arnaldo You ca
Please consider pulling from: bk://kernel.bkbits.net/acme/net-2.5 It has your suggestions implemented. Pulled, thanks. Note that, eventually we'll need to handle the struct sock side of this equation
Author: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sun, 20 Apr 2003 13:02:18 -0300
Em Sat, Apr 19, 2003 at 06:41:22PM -0700, David S. Miller escreveu: humm, I'll work on this later today, tweaking sk_alloc/sk_free. Thanks, now to easter lunch :-) - Arnaldo
Author: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sun, 20 Apr 2003 13:10:08 -0300
Em Sun, Apr 20, 2003 at 01:02:18PM -0300, Arnaldo C. Melo escreveu: as net_families is static in net/socket.c we'll need npf_get and npf_put (net proto family get/put), is the naming OK for you?
Em Sun, Apr 20, 2003 at 01:02:18PM -0300, Arnaldo C. Melo escreveu: as net_families is static in net/socket.c we'll need npf_get and npf_put (net proto family get/put), is the naming OK for you? I'd