Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[PATCH\]\s+subset\s+of\s+RFC2553\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[PATCH\]\s+subset\s+of\s+RFC2553\s*$/: 18 ]

Total 18 documents matching your query.

1. Re: [PATCH] subset of RFC2553 (score: 1): Author: "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Mon, 03 Mar 2003 00:44:57 -0800 (PST); Doh! Sorry, here (see below) it is against 2.5.59. Applied, thanks.; /archives/netdev/2003-03/msg00003.html (7,753 bytes)
2. [PATCH] subset of RFC2553 (score: 1): Author: Bruce Allan <bwa@xxxxxxxxxx>; Date: 12 Feb 2003 15:15:39 -0800; This patch against 2.5.59 adds bits of RFC 2553 Basic Socket Interface Extensions for IPv6; specifically the in6addr_any wildcard address and in6addr_loopback address structures, the respective IN6AD; /archives/netdev/2003-02/msg00034.html (13,808 bytes)
3. Re: [PATCH] subset of RFC2553 (score: 1): Author: "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Wed, 12 Feb 2003 21:43:05 -0800 (PST); I don't like how sockaddr_storage works, so you'll have to clean it up before we move it to a generic spot. +struct sockaddr_storage { + sa_family_t ss_family; /* address family */ + /* Following fie; /archives/netdev/2003-02/msg00035.html (9,949 bytes)
4. Re: [PATCH] subset of RFC2553 (score: 1): Author: Bruce Allan <bwa@xxxxxxxxxx>; Date: 18 Feb 2003 18:32:20 -0800; [This message was originally sent as a private response to Dave and others. I am resending it to the original audience and apologize if the private response was the incorrect thing to do - just tryin; /archives/netdev/2003-02/msg00073.html (13,113 bytes)
5. Re: [PATCH] subset of RFC2553 (score: 1): Author: idsen@xxxxxxx>; Date: 21 Feb 2003 09:06:08 -0800; Below is the rework of the original patch sent out last week with a version of sockaddr_storage that I hope is acceptable. It applies against 2.5.59. Thanks again, Bruce. diff -Naur linux-2.5.59/incl; /archives/netdev/2003-02/msg00119.html (13,864 bytes)
6. Re: [PATCH] subset of RFC2553 (score: 1): Author: xxxxx>; Date: Fri, 21 Feb 2003 23:23:57 -0800 (PST); Below is the rework of the original patch sent out last week with a version of sockaddr_storage that I hope is acceptable. It applies against 2.5.59. I will apply this patch, thanks for resolving all; /archives/netdev/2003-02/msg00122.html (9,093 bytes)
7. Re: [PATCH] subset of RFC2553 (score: 1): Author: xxxxx>; Date: Fri, 21 Feb 2003 23:26:39 -0800 (PST); Bruce, while applying this I noticed that in6addr_{any,loopback} are not exported by modules. Please send me a small patch to add the exports if this will be needed by SCTP and friends. Thanks.; /archives/netdev/2003-02/msg00123.html (8,959 bytes)
8. Re: [PATCH] subset of RFC2553 (score: 1): Author: xxxxx>; Date: Sat, 22 Feb 2003 11:26:10 +0200 (EET); Btw, FYI, RFC2553bis has been accepted for publication for Informational RFC some time ago. I think these definitions are the same there, though. It's available at: http://www.ietf.org/internet-draft; /archives/netdev/2003-02/msg00124.html (15,261 bytes)
9. Re: [PATCH] subset of RFC2553 (score: 1): Author: nan" <mksarav@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: 24 Feb 2003 09:54:57 -0800; xxxxxxx; /archives/netdev/2003-02/msg00151.html (9,713 bytes)
10. Re: [PATCH] subset of RFC2553 (score: 1): Author: "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Mon, 03 Mar 2003 00:44:57 -0800 (PST); Doh! Sorry, here (see below) it is against 2.5.59. Applied, thanks.; /archives/netdev/2003-03/msg00258.html (7,999 bytes)
11. [PATCH] subset of RFC2553 (score: 1): Author: Bruce Allan <bwa@xxxxxxxxxx>; Date: 12 Feb 2003 15:15:39 -0800; This patch against 2.5.59 adds bits of RFC 2553 Basic Socket Interface Extensions for IPv6; specifically the in6addr_any wildcard address and in6addr_loopback address structures, the respective IN6AD; /archives/netdev/2003-02/msg00216.html (13,808 bytes)
12. Re: [PATCH] subset of RFC2553 (score: 1): Author: "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Wed, 12 Feb 2003 21:43:05 -0800 (PST); I don't like how sockaddr_storage works, so you'll have to clean it up before we move it to a generic spot. +struct sockaddr_storage { + sa_family_t ss_family; /* address family */ + /* Following fie; /archives/netdev/2003-02/msg00217.html (10,015 bytes)
13. Re: [PATCH] subset of RFC2553 (score: 1): Author: Bruce Allan <bwa@xxxxxxxxxx>; Date: 18 Feb 2003 18:32:20 -0800; [This message was originally sent as a private response to Dave and others. I am resending it to the original audience and apologize if the private response was the incorrect thing to do - just tryin; /archives/netdev/2003-02/msg00255.html (13,113 bytes)
14. Re: [PATCH] subset of RFC2553 (score: 1): Author: Bruce Allan <bwa@xxxxxxxxxx>; Date: 21 Feb 2003 09:06:08 -0800; Below is the rework of the original patch sent out last week with a version of sockaddr_storage that I hope is acceptable. It applies against 2.5.59. Thanks again, Bruce. diff -Naur linux-2.5.59/incl; /archives/netdev/2003-02/msg00301.html (13,997 bytes)
15. Re: [PATCH] subset of RFC2553 (score: 1): Author: "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Fri, 21 Feb 2003 23:23:57 -0800 (PST); Below is the rework of the original patch sent out last week with a version of sockaddr_storage that I hope is acceptable. It applies against 2.5.59. I will apply this patch, thanks for resolving all; /archives/netdev/2003-02/msg00304.html (9,218 bytes)
16. Re: [PATCH] subset of RFC2553 (score: 1): Author: "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Fri, 21 Feb 2003 23:26:39 -0800 (PST); Bruce, while applying this I noticed that in6addr_{any,loopback} are not exported by modules. Please send me a small patch to add the exports if this will be needed by SCTP and friends. Thanks.; /archives/netdev/2003-02/msg00305.html (9,084 bytes)
17. Re: [PATCH] subset of RFC2553 (score: 1): Author: Pekka Savola <pekkas@xxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Sat, 22 Feb 2003 11:26:10 +0200 (EET); Btw, FYI, RFC2553bis has been accepted for publication for Informational RFC some time ago. I think these definitions are the same there, though. It's available at: http://www.ietf.org/internet-draft; /archives/netdev/2003-02/msg00306.html (15,307 bytes)
18. Re: [PATCH] subset of RFC2553 (score: 1): Author: Bruce Allan <bwa@xxxxxxxxxx>; Date: 24 Feb 2003 09:54:57 -0800; Doh! Sorry, here (see below) it is against 2.5.59. -- linux-2.5.59/net/ipv6/ipv6_syms.c 2003-01-16 18:22:25.000000000 -0800 +++ linux-2.5.59-RFC2553/net/ipv6/ipv6_syms.c 2003-02-24 09:02:41.000000000; /archives/netdev/2003-02/msg00333.html (9,885 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 18
Page: [1]