Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[PATCH\]\s+post\-sysfs\s+netdev\s+cleanup\s*$/: 12 ]

Total 12 documents matching your query.

1. [PATCH] post-sysfs netdev cleanup (score: 1)
Author: l@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 22 May 2003 20:41:17 -0400
The attached patch removes the struct device from struct net_device and sets net_device.class_dev.dev directly. The class_dev memset is removed because all of struct net_device should already be mems
/archives/netdev/2003-05/msg00293.html (9,081 bytes)

2. Re: [PATCH] post-sysfs netdev cleanup (score: 1)
Author: @xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 22 May 2003 17:44:15 -0700 (PDT)
The attached patch removes the struct device from struct net_device and sets net_device.class_dev.dev directly. The class_dev memset is removed because all of struct net_device should already be mems
/archives/netdev/2003-05/msg00295.html (7,972 bytes)

3. Re: [PATCH] post-sysfs netdev cleanup (score: 1)
Author: xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sun, 25 May 2003 19:22:12 -0700 (PDT)
The attached patch removes the struct device from struct net_device and sets net_device.class_dev.dev directly. Applied, thanks.
/archives/netdev/2003-05/msg00316.html (7,873 bytes)

4. Re: [PATCH] post-sysfs netdev cleanup (score: 1)
Author: <davem@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 27 May 2003 09:51:29 -0700
There needs to be some locking in the registration path doesn't there to prevent two calls to register the same name and other possible conflicts. So do you want to use dev_base lock or some other lo
/archives/netdev/2003-05/msg00330.html (9,236 bytes)

5. Re: [PATCH] post-sysfs netdev cleanup (score: 1)
Author: xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 28 May 2003 01:33:59 -0700 (PDT)
From: Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@xxxxxxxx> Date: Tue, 27 May 2003 09:51:29 -0700 There needs to be some locking in the registration path doesn't there to prevent two calls to register the same nam
/archives/netdev/2003-05/msg00331.html (8,365 bytes)

6. Re: [PATCH] post-sysfs netdev cleanup (score: 1)
Author: S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sun, 25 May 2003 19:24:17 -0700 (PDT)
Seems like a good idea too. Ok, great. Stephen, I think we need to find a way to put the device registration call outside of the RTNL semaphore. I removed in the unregister case, but to be complete w
/archives/netdev/2003-05/msg00380.html (8,390 bytes)

7. [PATCH] post-sysfs netdev cleanup (score: 1)
Author: Jeff Muizelaar <muizelaar@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 22 May 2003 20:41:17 -0400
The attached patch removes the struct device from struct net_device and sets net_device.class_dev.dev directly. The class_dev memset is removed because all of struct net_device should already be mems
/archives/netdev/2003-05/msg00695.html (9,120 bytes)

8. Re: [PATCH] post-sysfs netdev cleanup (score: 1)
Author: "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 22 May 2003 17:44:15 -0700 (PDT)
The attached patch removes the struct device from struct net_device and sets net_device.class_dev.dev directly. The class_dev memset is removed because all of struct net_device should already be mems
/archives/netdev/2003-05/msg00697.html (8,020 bytes)

9. Re: [PATCH] post-sysfs netdev cleanup (score: 1)
Author: "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sun, 25 May 2003 19:22:12 -0700 (PDT)
The attached patch removes the struct device from struct net_device and sets net_device.class_dev.dev directly. Applied, thanks.
/archives/netdev/2003-05/msg00718.html (7,921 bytes)

10. Re: [PATCH] post-sysfs netdev cleanup (score: 1)
Author: Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@xxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 27 May 2003 09:51:29 -0700
There needs to be some locking in the registration path doesn't there to prevent two calls to register the same name and other possible conflicts. So do you want to use dev_base lock or some other lo
/archives/netdev/2003-05/msg00732.html (9,428 bytes)

11. Re: [PATCH] post-sysfs netdev cleanup (score: 1)
Author: "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 28 May 2003 01:33:59 -0700 (PDT)
From: Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@xxxxxxxx> Date: Tue, 27 May 2003 09:51:29 -0700 There needs to be some locking in the registration path doesn't there to prevent two calls to register the same nam
/archives/netdev/2003-05/msg00733.html (8,540 bytes)

12. Re: [PATCH] post-sysfs netdev cleanup (score: 1)
Author: "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sun, 25 May 2003 19:24:17 -0700 (PDT)
Seems like a good idea too. Ok, great. Stephen, I think we need to find a way to put the device registration call outside of the RTNL semaphore. I removed in the unregister case, but to be complete w
/archives/netdev/2003-05/msg00782.html (8,556 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu