Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[PATCH\]\s+optimize\s+check\s+in\s+port\-allocation\s+code\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[PATCH\]\s+optimize\s+check\s+in\s+port\-allocation\s+code\s*$/: 10 ]

Total 10 documents matching your query.

1. Re: [PATCH] optimize check in port-allocation code (score: 1): Author: "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Tue, 3 May 2005 14:36:20 -0700; Both patches applied, thanks a lot.; /archives/netdev/2005-05/msg00086.html (8,310 bytes)
2. Re: [PATCH] optimize check in port-allocation code (score: 1): Author: folkert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx; Date: Wed, 4 May 2005 09:15:20 +0200; What about moving that rover++ to the end of the loop? Was my analysis correct? Folkert van Heusden -- Auto te koop, zie: http://www.vanheusden.com/daihatsu.php Op zoek naar een IT of Finance baan?; /archives/netdev/2005-05/msg00141.html (9,710 bytes)
3. [PATCH] optimize check in port-allocation code (score: 1): Author: xxx>; Date: Wed, 20 Apr 2005 20:44:21 +0200; h.venka; /archives/netdev/2005-04/msg00685.html (11,038 bytes)
4. Re: [PATCH] optimize check in port-allocation code (score: 1): Author: " <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Thu, 28 Apr 2005 12:08:24 -0700; apply.; /archives/netdev/2005-04/msg00988.html (8,013 bytes)
5. Re: [PATCH] optimize check in port-allocation code (score: 1): Author: t" <markb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Thu, 28 Apr 2005 23:24:53 +0200; 2005-02; /archives/netdev/2005-04/msg00997.html (11,902 bytes)
6. Re: [PATCH] optimize check in port-allocation code (score: 1): Author: "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Tue, 3 May 2005 14:36:20 -0700; Both patches applied, thanks a lot.; /archives/netdev/2005-05/msg01375.html (8,670 bytes)
7. Re: [PATCH] optimize check in port-allocation code (score: 1): Author: folkert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx; Date: Wed, 4 May 2005 09:15:20 +0200; What about moving that rover++ to the end of the loop? Was my analysis correct? Folkert van Heusden -- Auto te koop, zie: http://www.vanheusden.com/daihatsu.php Op zoek naar een IT of Finance baan?; /archives/netdev/2005-05/msg01430.html (10,175 bytes)
8. [PATCH] optimize check in port-allocation code (score: 1): Author: folkert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx; Date: Wed, 20 Apr 2005 20:44:21 +0200; Hi, In the 2.6.11 code, I found this: static int tcp_v6_get_port(struct sock *sk, unsigned short snum) also in: static int tcp_v4_get_port(struct sock *sk, unsigned short snum) { ... if (snum == 0) {; /archives/netdev/2005-04/msg01821.html (11,126 bytes)
9. Re: [PATCH] optimize check in port-allocation code (score: 1): Author: "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Thu, 28 Apr 2005 12:08:24 -0700; It still has spaces where there should be tabs, even though you compressed the patch and used attachment. The diff itself must already be corrupt before you attach it. Please double check that the pa; /archives/netdev/2005-04/msg02124.html (8,224 bytes)
10. Re: [PATCH] optimize check in port-allocation code (score: 1): Author: folkert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx; Date: Thu, 28 Apr 2005 23:24:53 +0200; Ok, I've redone them and tested if they patch cleanly, they now do. See them attached. While looking at the code I also saw something else: -- tcp_ipv4.c.org 2005-04-28 23:13:32.000000000 +0200 +++; /archives/netdev/2005-04/msg02133.html (12,217 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 10
Page: [1]