Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[PATCH\]\s+merge\s+sctp_opt\s+with\s+sctp

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[PATCH\]\s+merge\s+sctp_opt\s+with\s+sctp_sock\s*$/: 12 ]

Total 12 documents matching your query.

1. " again (score: 1): Author: Garzik <jgarzik@xxxxxxxxx>; Date: Sat, 15 Jan 2005 02:52:13 -0200; his thing? Yes I have a better theory now :) All your "badness" messages star; /archives/netdev/2005-01/msg00623.html (39,956 bytes)
2. New syskonnect gigabit ether driver (skge) (score: 1): Author: xxxxx>; Date: Mon, 17 Jan 2005 13:33:27 -0800; e2-tgr if you like.; /archives/netdev/2005-01/msg00731.html (8,530 bytes)
3. rnative version of S/390 shared NIC support (score: 1): Author: xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Mon, 17 Jan 2005 23:12:13 -0200; ead,write,data). S/390 has hardware; /archives/netdev/2005-01/msg00759.html (10,340 bytes)
4. p_sock (score: 1): Author: o Carvalho de Melo <acme@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Mon, 17 Jan 2005 17:40:01 -0800 (PST); rom: bk://kernel.bkbits.net/acme/co; /archives/netdev/2005-01/msg00761.html (9,944 bytes)
5. k (score: 1): Author: xxxxxx>; Date: Mon, 17 Jan 2005 23:49:33 -0200; Arnaldo == ChangeSet@xxxxxx, 2005-0; /archives/netdev/2005-01/msg00762.html (11,212 bytes)
6. k (score: 1): Author: xxxxxx>; Date: Mon, 17 Jan 2005 18:18:04 -0800 (PST); SCTP, SCTP also could do a memcpy o; /archives/netdev/2005-01/msg00763.html (11,400 bytes)
7. [PATCH] merge sctp_opt with sctp_sock (score: 1): Author: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Sat, 15 Jan 2005 02:52:13 -0200; Hi David, Sridhar, Please take a look and if its acceptable pull from: bk://kernel.bkbits.net/acme/connection_sock-2.6 The tricky bit here is that SCTP, to keep the existing logic, needs a way to cop; /archives/netdev/2005-01/msg02113.html (39,805 bytes)
8. Re: [PATCH] merge sctp_opt with sctp_sock (score: 1): Author: "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Mon, 17 Jan 2005 13:33:27 -0800; This looks fine, although I wish the descendant copying thing could be done more cleanly somehow. Pulled.; /archives/netdev/2005-01/msg02221.html (8,578 bytes)
9. Re: [PATCH] merge sctp_opt with sctp_sock (score: 1): Author: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Mon, 17 Jan 2005 23:12:13 -0200; Please take a look and if its acceptable pull from: bk://kernel.bkbits.net/acme/connection_sock-2.6 The tricky bit here is that SCTP, to keep the existing logic, needs a way to copy only its private; /archives/netdev/2005-01/msg02249.html (10,258 bytes)
10. Re: [PATCH] merge sctp_opt with sctp_sock (score: 1): Author: Sridhar Samudrala <sri@xxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Mon, 17 Jan 2005 17:40:01 -0800 (PST); I thought you introduced this generic function so that other protocols also may use it. If you & Dave feel that this is not clean and is going to be needed only by SCTP, SCTP also could do a memcpy o; /archives/netdev/2005-01/msg02251.html (10,053 bytes)
11. Re: [PATCH] merge sctp_opt with sctp_sock (score: 1): Author: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Mon, 17 Jan 2005 23:49:33 -0200; David S. Miller escreveu: Please take a look and if its acceptable pull from: bk://kernel.bkbits.net/acme/connection_sock-2.6 The tricky bit here is that SCTP, to keep the existing logic, needs a wa; /archives/netdev/2005-01/msg02252.html (11,167 bytes)
12. Re: [PATCH] merge sctp_opt with sctp_sock (score: 1): Author: Sridhar Samudrala <sri@xxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Mon, 17 Jan 2005 18:18:04 -0800 (PST); It looks fine and i don't see any issues. will try to pull from davem's tree and test to see that it doesn't break any SCTP regression tests. -Sridhar; /archives/netdev/2005-01/msg02253.html (11,574 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 12
Page: [1]