Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[PATCH\]\s+ipv4\s+skbuff\s+locking\s+scope\s*$/: 12 ]

Total 12 documents matching your query.

1. [PATCH] ipv4 skbuff locking scope (score: 1)
Author: Tom Leete <tleete@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 30 Oct 2000 17:24:24 -0500
/archives/netdev/2000-10/msg00138.html (9,173 bytes)

2. Re: [PATCH] ipv4 skbuff locking scope (score: 1)
Author: "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 30 Oct 2000 14:24:46 -0800
/archives/netdev/2000-10/msg00139.html (8,700 bytes)

3. Re: [PATCH] ipv4 skbuff locking scope (score: 1)
Author: Horst von Brand <vonbrand@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 30 Oct 2000 23:41:55 -0300
/archives/netdev/2000-10/msg00140.html (8,017 bytes)

4. Re: [PATCH] ipv4 skbuff locking scope (score: 1)
Author: Tom Leete <tleete@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 30 Oct 2000 22:18:07 -0500
/archives/netdev/2000-10/msg00141.html (9,391 bytes)

5. Re: [PATCH] ipv4 skbuff locking scope (score: 1)
Author: "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 30 Oct 2000 20:03:24 -0800
/archives/netdev/2000-10/msg00142.html (8,635 bytes)

6. Re: [PATCH] ipv4 skbuff locking scope (score: 1)
Author: "Albert D. Cahalan" <acahalan@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 30 Oct 2000 23:38:24 -0500 (EST)
/archives/netdev/2000-10/msg00143.html (8,089 bytes)

7. [PATCH] ipv4 skbuff locking scope (score: 1)
Author: Tom Leete <tleete@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 30 Oct 2000 17:24:24 -0500
Hello, This fixes tests of a socket buffer done without holding the lock. tcp_data_wait() and wait_for_tcp_memory() both had unguarded refs in their sleep conditionals. Tom -- linux-2.4.0-test10-pre5
/archives/netdev/2000-10/msg00285.html (9,173 bytes)

8. Re: [PATCH] ipv4 skbuff locking scope (score: 1)
Author: "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 30 Oct 2000 14:24:46 -0800
This fixes tests of a socket buffer done without holding the lock. tcp_data_wait() and wait_for_tcp_memory() both had unguarded refs in their sleep conditionals. These are not buggy at all, see the d
/archives/netdev/2000-10/msg00286.html (8,750 bytes)

9. Re: [PATCH] ipv4 skbuff locking scope (score: 1)
Author: Horst von Brand <vonbrand@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 30 Oct 2000 23:41:55 -0300
[...] Could you please Cc: them into the kernel? ;-) -- Horst von Brand vonbrand@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Casilla 9G, Vin~a del Mar, Chile +56 32 672616
/archives/netdev/2000-10/msg00287.html (8,086 bytes)

10. Re: [PATCH] ipv4 skbuff locking scope (score: 1)
Author: Tom Leete <tleete@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 30 Oct 2000 22:18:07 -0500
I'll post traces privately. It was my lockups that got Rick interested. Would you explain what is accomplished by toggling the lock every time through? What breaks by not doing so? Not me, but see be
/archives/netdev/2000-10/msg00288.html (9,445 bytes)

11. Re: [PATCH] ipv4 skbuff locking scope (score: 1)
Author: "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 30 Oct 2000 20:03:24 -0800
Would you explain what is accomplished by toggling the lock every time through? What breaks by not doing so? Incoming packets are not processed while the lock is held, they get queued to the backlog.
/archives/netdev/2000-10/msg00289.html (8,739 bytes)

12. Re: [PATCH] ipv4 skbuff locking scope (score: 1)
Author: "Albert D. Cahalan" <acahalan@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 30 Oct 2000 23:38:24 -0500 (EST)
... You can prevent future "fixes" by putting your comments in the code. /* like this */
/archives/netdev/2000-10/msg00290.html (8,118 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu