Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[PATCH\]\s+fix\s+barrier\s+fail\s+detection\s*$/: 27 ]

Total 27 documents matching your query.

1. [PATCH] fix barrier fail detection (score: 1)
Author: >
Date: Thu, 9 Oct 2008 15:00:42 +0200
Currently we disable barriers as soon as we get a buffer in xlog_iodone that has the XBF_ORDERED flag cleared. But this can be the case not only for buffers where the barrier failed, but also the fir
/archives/xfs/2008-10/msg00151.html (10,481 bytes)

2. Re: [PATCH] fix barrier fail detection (score: 1)
Author: >
Date: Thu, 09 Oct 2008 09:24:08 -0500
Fix looks good to me (I saw this failure too but at first attributed it to some hackery I was working on). Think it can still make 2.6.27? -Eric
/archives/xfs/2008-10/msg00152.html (12,054 bytes)

3. Re: [PATCH] fix barrier fail detection (score: 1)
Author: >
Date: Fri, 10 Oct 2008 09:35:34 +1100
Looks good. Should this be sent straight to Linus to get it into .27? If you want to do that, you can add my SOB. Cheers, Dave. -- Dave Chinner david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
/archives/xfs/2008-10/msg00157.html (9,396 bytes)

4. Re: [PATCH] fix barrier fail detection (score: 1)
Author: >
Date: Fri, 10 Oct 2008 02:43:36 +0200
I'll hope Lachlan or Tim as maintainers will pick up..
/archives/xfs/2008-10/msg00161.html (8,285 bytes)

5. Re: [PATCH] fix barrier fail detection (score: 1)
Author: >
Date: Fri, 10 Oct 2008 11:44:12 +1100
Oops. Looks good and I'll check it in to ptools. Thanks, Tim.
/archives/xfs/2008-10/msg00162.html (11,937 bytes)

6. Re: [PATCH] fix barrier fail detection (score: 1)
Author: >
Date: Fri, 10 Oct 2008 12:12:58 +1100
Actually, probably need to update the comment for this one. The existing comment being: Okay, we probably should update this comment too. The existing comment being: Might as well fix the existing ty
/archives/xfs/2008-10/msg00163.html (13,172 bytes)

7. Re: [PATCH] fix barrier fail detection (score: 1)
Author: )
Date: Fri, 10 Oct 2008 15:17:03 +1100
i.e. something like: Index: 2.6.x-xfs-quilt/fs/xfs/linux-2.6/xfs_buf.c == -- 2.6.x-xfs-quilt.orig/fs/xfs/linux-2.6/xfs_buf.c 2008-09-19 13:47:36.000000000 +1000 +++ 2.6.x-xfs-quilt/fs/xfs/linux-2.6/x
/archives/xfs/2008-10/msg00169.html (13,673 bytes)

8. Re: [PATCH] fix barrier fail detection (score: 1)
Author: )
Date: Fri, 10 Oct 2008 15:27:32 +1100
..... ..... Looks fine to me. Cheers, Dave. -- Dave Chinner david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
/archives/xfs/2008-10/msg00171.html (9,057 bytes)

9. Re: [PATCH] fix barrier fail detection (score: 1)
Author: >
Date: Fri, 10 Oct 2008 11:23:34 +0200
Yeah, looks good.
/archives/xfs/2008-10/msg00186.html (8,728 bytes)

10. eplace the mount inode list with radix tree traversals (score: 1)
Author: <david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 9 Oct 2008 15:00:42 +0200
Currently we disable barriers as soon as we get a buffer in xlog_iodone that has the XBF_ORDERED flag cleared. But this can be the case not only for buffers where the barrier failed, but also the fir
/archives/xfs/2008-10/msg00971.html (10,301 bytes)

11. dix tree traversals (score: 1)
Author: Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 09 Oct 2008 09:24:08 -0500
Fix looks good to me (I saw this failure too but at first attributed it to some hackery I was working on). Think it can still make 2.6.27? -Eric
/archives/xfs/2008-10/msg00972.html (11,874 bytes)

12. reclaim (score: 1)
Author: <david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 10 Oct 2008 09:35:34 +1100
Looks good. Should this be sent straight to Linus to get it into .27? If you want to do that, you can add my SOB. Cheers, Dave. -- Dave Chinner david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
/archives/xfs/2008-10/msg00978.html (9,216 bytes)

13. s inode reclaim (score: 1)
Author: kie <pleckie@xxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 10 Oct 2008 02:43:36 +0200
I'll hope Lachlan or Tim as maintainers will pick up..
/archives/xfs/2008-10/msg00981.html (8,105 bytes)

14. eout feature (score: 1)
Author: Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 10 Oct 2008 11:44:12 +1100
Oops. Looks good and I'll check it in to ptools. Thanks, Tim.
/archives/xfs/2008-10/msg00982.html (11,757 bytes)

15. t feature (score: 1)
Author: Shimmin <tes@xxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 10 Oct 2008 12:12:58 +1100
Actually, probably need to update the comment for this one. The existing comment being: Okay, we probably should update this comment too. The existing comment being: Might as well fix the existing ty
/archives/xfs/2008-10/msg00983.html (12,992 bytes)

16. _ defines (score: 1)
Author: xxx (Lachlan McIlroy)
Date: Fri, 10 Oct 2008 15:17:03 +1100
i.e. something like: Index: 2.6.x-xfs-quilt/fs/xfs/linux-2.6/xfs_buf.c == -- 2.6.x-xfs-quilt.orig/fs/xfs/linux-2.6/xfs_buf.c 2008-09-19 13:47:36.000000000 +1000 +++ 2.6.x-xfs-quilt/fs/xfs/linux-2.6/x
/archives/xfs/2008-10/msg00989.html (13,493 bytes)

17. PATCH V2] Re-dirty pages on ENOSPC when converting delayed allocations (score: 1)
Author: xxxxxx (Peter Leckie)
Date: Fri, 10 Oct 2008 15:27:32 +1100
..... ..... Looks fine to me. Cheers, Dave. -- Dave Chinner david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
/archives/xfs/2008-10/msg00991.html (8,877 bytes)

18. anup maxrecs calculation. (score: 1)
Author: <Martin@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 10 Oct 2008 11:23:34 +0200
Yeah, looks good.
/archives/xfs/2008-10/msg01006.html (8,549 bytes)

19. [PATCH] fix barrier fail detection (score: 1)
Author: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 9 Oct 2008 15:00:42 +0200
Currently we disable barriers as soon as we get a buffer in xlog_iodone that has the XBF_ORDERED flag cleared. But this can be the case not only for buffers where the barrier failed, but also the fir
/archives/xfs/2008-10/msg01789.html (10,301 bytes)

20. Re: [PATCH] fix barrier fail detection (score: 1)
Author: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 09 Oct 2008 09:24:08 -0500
Fix looks good to me (I saw this failure too but at first attributed it to some hackery I was working on). Think it can still make 2.6.27? -Eric
/archives/xfs/2008-10/msg01790.html (11,934 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu