Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[PATCH\]\s+finer\-grained\s+locking\s+in\s+wan\/lmc\s+driver\s*$/: 8 ]

Total 8 documents matching your query.

1. [PATCH] finer-grained locking in wan/lmc driver (score: 1)
Author: xxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 06 Oct 2003 15:12:22 -0300
Hi Jeff, Patch against 2.6-test6. - lmc_ioctl was calling copy_{from|to}_user with the device lock held, replace it with finer-grained locking; - Remove check_version usage; - If copy_from_user fails
/archives/netdev/2003-10/msg00145.html (16,137 bytes)

2. Re: [PATCH] finer-grained locking in wan/lmc driver (score: 1)
Author: zik <jgarzik@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 14 Oct 2003 14:18:37 -0400
conflicts with a just-applied patch... can you wait a few days, then resend against the latest -bk snapshot?
/archives/netdev/2003-10/msg00387.html (7,933 bytes)

3. Re: [PATCH] finer-grained locking in wan/lmc driver (score: 1)
Author: r <shemminger@xxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 14 Oct 2003 15:31:16 -0200
Jeff Garzik wrote: conflicts with a just-applied patch... can you wait a few days, then resend against the latest -bk snapshot? Yep. Felipe
/archives/netdev/2003-10/msg00389.html (8,300 bytes)

4. 139cp NAPI race? (score: 1)
Author: r <shemminger@xxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 17 Oct 2003 17:00:37 -0200
ivers) the two lines in 8139cp.c look backwards: static int cp_rx_poll (struct net_device *dev, int *budget) { ... /* if we did not reach work limit, then we'
/archives/netdev/2003-10/msg00490.html (16,194 bytes)

5. [PATCH] finer-grained locking in wan/lmc driver (score: 1)
Author: Felipe W Damasio <felipewd@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 06 Oct 2003 15:12:22 -0300
Hi Jeff, Patch against 2.6-test6. - lmc_ioctl was calling copy_{from|to}_user with the device lock held, replace it with finer-grained locking; - Remove check_version usage; - If copy_from_user fails
/archives/netdev/2003-10/msg00887.html (16,002 bytes)

6. Re: [PATCH] finer-grained locking in wan/lmc driver (score: 1)
Author: Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 14 Oct 2003 14:18:37 -0400
conflicts with a just-applied patch... can you wait a few days, then resend against the latest -bk snapshot?
/archives/netdev/2003-10/msg01129.html (7,976 bytes)

7. Re: [PATCH] finer-grained locking in wan/lmc driver (score: 1)
Author: Felipe W Damasio <felipewd@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 14 Oct 2003 15:31:16 -0200
Yep. Felipe
/archives/netdev/2003-10/msg01131.html (8,326 bytes)

8. Re: [PATCH] finer-grained locking in wan/lmc driver (score: 1)
Author: Felipe W Damasio <felipewd@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 17 Oct 2003 17:00:37 -0200
Hi Jeff, Resend against 2.6.0-test7-bk9. Please apply, Felipe -- linux-2.6.0-test7-bk9/drivers/net/wan/lmc/lmc_main.c.orig 2003-10-17 16:57:28.000000000 -0200 +++ linux-2.6.0-test7-bk9/drivers/net/wa
/archives/netdev/2003-10/msg01232.html (16,219 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu