Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[PATCH\]\s+ethertap\s+can\s+use\s+alloc

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[PATCH\]\s+ethertap\s+can\s+use\s+alloc_etherdev\s*$/: 8 ]

Total 8 documents matching your query.

1. [PATCH] ethertap can use alloc_etherdev (score: 1): Author: Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@xxxxxxxx>; Date: Tue, 11 Nov 2003 14:45:57 -0800; Can use alloc_etherdev, don't need to call ether_setup. Found by viro. diff -Nru a/drivers/net/ethertap.c b/drivers/net/ethertap.c -- a/drivers/net/ethertap.c Tue Nov 11 09:36:15 2003 +++ b/drivers/n; /archives/netdev/2003-11/msg00168.html (7,610 bytes)
2. Re: [PATCH] ethertap can use alloc_etherdev (score: 1): Author: en <ak@xxxxxxx>; Date: Tue, 11 Nov 2003 16:47:58 -0800; It forces it already several lines later and it hasn't registered yet. if (!dev) goto out; SET_MODULE_OWNER(dev); sprintf(dev->name, "tap%d", unit); dev->base_addr = unit + NETLINK_TAPBASE; -- Stephe; /archives/netdev/2003-11/msg00182.html (9,064 bytes)
3. Re: [PATCH] ethertap can use alloc_etherdev (score: 1): Author: xxxxxx>; Date: Tue, 11 Nov 2003 19:50:45 -0500; Stephen Hemminger wrote: It forces it already several lines later and it hasn't registered yet. OK. I applied all but this patch and another one that didn't apply cleanly. Grab the latest net-drivers; /archives/netdev/2003-11/msg00183.html (8,248 bytes)
4. Re: [PATCH] ethertap can use alloc_etherdev (score: 1): Author: xxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Tue, 11 Nov 2003 18:52:48 -0500; Stephen Hemminger wrote: Can use alloc_etherdev, don't need to call ether_setup. Found by viro. diff -Nru a/drivers/net/ethertap.c b/drivers/net/ethertap.c -- a/drivers/net/ethertap.c Tue Nov 11 09:3; /archives/netdev/2003-11/msg00203.html (8,444 bytes)
5. [PATCH] ethertap can use alloc_etherdev (score: 1): Author: Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@xxxxxxxx>; Date: Tue, 11 Nov 2003 14:45:57 -0800; Can use alloc_etherdev, don't need to call ether_setup. Found by viro. diff -Nru a/drivers/net/ethertap.c b/drivers/net/ethertap.c -- a/drivers/net/ethertap.c Tue Nov 11 09:36:15 2003 +++ b/drivers/n; /archives/netdev/2003-11/msg00781.html (7,610 bytes)
6. Re: [PATCH] ethertap can use alloc_etherdev (score: 1): Author: Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@xxxxxxxx>; Date: Tue, 11 Nov 2003 16:47:58 -0800; It forces it already several lines later and it hasn't registered yet. if (!dev) goto out; SET_MODULE_OWNER(dev); sprintf(dev->name, "tap%d", unit); dev->base_addr = unit + NETLINK_TAPBASE; -- Stephe; /archives/netdev/2003-11/msg00795.html (9,169 bytes)
7. Re: [PATCH] ethertap can use alloc_etherdev (score: 1): Author: Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@xxxxxxxxx>; Date: Tue, 11 Nov 2003 19:50:45 -0500; OK. I applied all but this patch and another one that didn't apply cleanly. Grab the latest net-drivers-2.5-exp patch I just posted, and resend against that... Jeff; /archives/netdev/2003-11/msg00796.html (8,405 bytes)
8. Re: [PATCH] ethertap can use alloc_etherdev (score: 1): Author: Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@xxxxxxxxx>; Date: Tue, 11 Nov 2003 18:52:48 -0500; diff -Nru a/drivers/net/ethertap.c b/drivers/net/ethertap.c -- a/drivers/net/ethertap.c Tue Nov 11 09:36:15 2003 +++ b/drivers/net/ethertap.c Tue Nov 11 09:36:15 2003 @@ -72,8 +72,7 @@ struct net_dev; /archives/netdev/2003-11/msg00816.html (8,554 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 8
Page: [1]