Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[PATCH\]\s+don\'t\s+require\s+ip_forwarding\s+for\s+reset\s+on\s+a\s+bridge\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[PATCH\]\s+don\'t\s+require\s+ip_forwarding\s+for\s+reset\s+on\s+a\s+bridge\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. [PATCH] don't require ip_forwarding for reset on a bridge (score: 1): Author: com; Date: Mon, 29 Mar 2004 23:14:12 +0200; Hi Dave, Currently, to be able to send a reset in the FORWARD chain of iptables for bridged traffic, ip forwarding must be enabled. This causes confusion and in some situations people really don't wa; /archives/netdev/2004-03/msg00573.html (8,558 bytes)
2. Re: [PATCH] don't require ip_forwarding for reset on a bridge (score: 1): Author:; Date: Mon, 29 Mar 2004 20:30:25 -0800; I want an ACK from the netfilter folks before applying this one.; /archives/netdev/2004-03/msg00582.html (7,974 bytes)
3. [PATCH] don't require ip_forwarding for reset on a bridge (score: 1): Author: Bart De Schuymer <bdschuym@xxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Mon, 29 Mar 2004 23:14:12 +0200; Hi Dave, Currently, to be able to send a reset in the FORWARD chain of iptables for bridged traffic, ip forwarding must be enabled. This causes confusion and in some situations people really don't wa; /archives/netdev/2004-03/msg01237.html (8,558 bytes)
4. Re: [PATCH] don't require ip_forwarding for reset on a bridge (score: 1): Author: "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Mon, 29 Mar 2004 20:30:25 -0800; I want an ACK from the netfilter folks before applying this one.; /archives/netdev/2004-03/msg01246.html (8,044 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]