Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[PATCH\]\s+do\s+not\s+test\s+return\s+value\s+of\s+xfs_bmap_\*_count

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[PATCH\]\s+do\s+not\s+test\s+return\s+value\s+of\s+xfs_bmap_\*_count_leaves\s*$/: 9 ]

Total 9 documents matching your query.

1. Re: [PATCH] do not test return value of xfs_bmap_*_count_leaves (score: 1): Author: Ruben Porras <ruben.porras@xxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Fri, 04 Apr 2008 17:08:30 +0200; Am Freitag, den 28.03.2008, 11:46 -0400 schrieb Josef 'Jeff' Sipek: better, patch attached. -- RubÃn Porras Campo Telekommunikation Engineer LinWorks GmbH Robert-Koch-StraÃe 9; 64331 Weiterstadt http; /archives/xfs/2008-04/msg00087.html (8,043 bytes)
2. inode generation number initialisation (score: 1): Author: Ruben Porras <ruben.porras@xxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Fri, 04 Apr 2008 17:08:30 +0200; I guess that means a wrapper function is in order. I'm not going to deal with this as part of this patch series, though. I'll just remove the superfluous notations. Patch below. Cheers, Dave.; /archives/xfs/2008-04/msg00683.html (8,043 bytes)
3. Fedora 8 updates (score: 1): Author: xxxxxxxxx>; Date: Fri, 28 Mar 2008 16:43:31 +0100; call it a bug? times with and without the patch and it seems to confirm. a little hard to say since it has the 64-bit features2 padding proble; /archives/xfs/2008-03/msg00352.html (7,057 bytes)
4. ap_*_count_leaves (score: 1): Author: xxxxxxxxx>; Date: Fri, 28 Mar 2008 11:46:05 -0400; count_leaves, return always 0. Therefore it is not necessary to test the return value. Regards Attachment: xfs_bmap.patch Description: Text Da; /archives/xfs/2008-03/msg00353.html (7,762 bytes)
5. ature ver 1.0 (score: 1): Author: <sandeen@xxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Fri, 28 Mar 2008 16:43:31 +0100; stem int ioctl(int fd, int FIFREEZE, long *timeval) fd: The file descriptor of the; /archives/xfs/2008-03/msg00741.html (7,057 bytes)
6. CH] do not test return value of xfs_bmap_*_count_leaves (score: 1): Author: n.porras@xxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Fri, 28 Mar 2008 11:46:05 -0400; ident (e.g. signals), the filesystem will be left frozen. So, I think the timeout; /archives/xfs/2008-03/msg00742.html (7,762 bytes)
7. Re: [PATCH] do not test return value of xfs_bmap_*_count_leaves (score: 1): Author: Ruben Porras <ruben.porras@xxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Fri, 04 Apr 2008 17:08:30 +0200; Am Freitag, den 28.03.2008, 11:46 -0400 schrieb Josef 'Jeff' Sipek: better, patch attached. -- Rubén Porras Campo Telekommunikation Engineer LinWorks GmbH Robert-Koch-Straße 9; 64331 Weiterstadt http; /archives/xfs/2008-04/msg01279.html (8,233 bytes)
8. [PATCH] do not test return value of xfs_bmap_*_count_leaves (score: 1): Author: Ruben Porras <ruben.porras@xxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Fri, 28 Mar 2008 16:43:31 +0100; These functions, xfs_bmap_count_leaves and xfs_bmap_disk_count_leaves, return always 0. Therefore it is not necessary to test the return value. Regards Attachment: xfs_bmap.patch Description: Text Da; /archives/xfs/2008-03/msg01130.html (7,057 bytes)
9. Re: [PATCH] do not test return value of xfs_bmap_*_count_leaves (score: 1): Author: "Josef 'Jeff' Sipek" <jeffpc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Fri, 28 Mar 2008 11:46:05 -0400; If it always returns 0, why not make it void? Josef 'Jeff' Sipek. -- Hegh QaQ law' quvHa'ghach QaQ puS; /archives/xfs/2008-03/msg01131.html (7,880 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 9
Page: [1]