Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[PATCH\]\s+ax25\s+\&\s+netrom\s+fixes\s+for\s+2\.6\s*$/: 12 ]

Total 12 documents matching your query.

1. [PATCH] ax25 & netrom fixes for 2.6 (score: 1)
Author: er <shemminger@xxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 12 Aug 2003 19:46:53 +0200
've got code to p
/archives/netdev/2003-08/msg00338.html (10,648 bytes)

2. Re: [PATCH] ax25 & netrom fixes for 2.6 (score: 1)
Author:
Date: Tue, 12 Aug 2003 12:48:20 -0700
b_all_ipi when ip
/archives/netdev/2003-08/msg00341.html (13,351 bytes)

3. Re: [PATCH] ax25 & netrom fixes for 2.6 (score: 1)
Author: Andrey J. Melnikoff (TEMHOTA)" <temnota@xxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 12 Aug 2003 13:56:55 -0700
bled! Uninitialis
/archives/netdev/2003-08/msg00342.html (9,276 bytes)

4. Re: [PATCH] ax25 & netrom fixes for 2.6 (score: 1)
Author: xxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 12 Aug 2003 22:59:12 +0200
e address portion
/archives/netdev/2003-08/msg00343.html (9,352 bytes)

5. Re: [PATCH] ax25 & netrom fixes for 2.6 (score: 1)
Author: ger@xxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 12 Aug 2003 23:09:51 +0200
enabled... Jeroen
/archives/netdev/2003-08/msg00344.html (10,127 bytes)

6. Re: [PATCH] ax25 & netrom fixes for 2.6 (score: 1)
Author: ch@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 13 Aug 2003 03:10:38 -0700
le. (So if only a few prefix lengths are used, the tree is small). Il
/archives/netdev/2003-08/msg00356.html (9,520 bytes)

7. [PATCH] ax25 & netrom fixes for 2.6 (score: 1)
Author: Jeroen Vreeken <pe1rxq@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 12 Aug 2003 19:46:53 +0200
Hi, These are the same changes I send earlier in two parts against 2.6.0-test1. I remade the diff against 2.6.0-test3 as Stephen Hemminger's patch clashed with mine (My patch already had the fix....)
/archives/netdev/2003-08/msg01310.html (10,648 bytes)

8. Re: [PATCH] ax25 & netrom fixes for 2.6 (score: 1)
Author: Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@xxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 12 Aug 2003 12:48:20 -0700
You lost a critical fix to ax25; it oop's if I bring up any device then do "ifconfig -a" due to use after free. PLEASE do some debugging with some of the kernel debugging options enabled! Uninitialis
/archives/netdev/2003-08/msg01313.html (13,409 bytes)

9. Re: [PATCH] ax25 & netrom fixes for 2.6 (score: 1)
Author: Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@xxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 12 Aug 2003 13:56:55 -0700
It looks like af_x25 is advertising itself as a new style protocol, yet if I walk the receive path: ax25_kiss_rcv -> ax25_rcv -> ax25_addr_parse there is no place that checks that the address portion
/archives/netdev/2003-08/msg01314.html (9,334 bytes)

10. Re: [PATCH] ax25 & netrom fixes for 2.6 (score: 1)
Author: Jeroen Vreeken <pe1rxq@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 12 Aug 2003 22:59:12 +0200
Which fix exactly did I miss? the only thing I see in your patch is the change to use sock_put in ax25_destroy_sock() and that was in my original patch... btw, I do have debugging enabled... Jeroen
/archives/netdev/2003-08/msg01315.html (9,511 bytes)

11. Re: [PATCH] ax25 & netrom fixes for 2.6 (score: 1)
Author: Jeroen Vreeken <pe1rxq@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 12 Aug 2003 23:09:51 +0200
Since at the moment the only zero-copy path I can imagine is from packets over a bpq ethernet device wouldn't it be the easiest to just check at ax25_rcv() for non-linear packets and call skb_lineari
/archives/netdev/2003-08/msg01316.html (10,286 bytes)

12. Re: [PATCH] ax25 & netrom fixes for 2.6 (score: 1)
Author: "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 13 Aug 2003 03:10:38 -0700
skb_linearize() is a deprecated interface, no new pieces of code should use it. If you want to mark the protocol as a new one you must do the non-linear handling properly just like every other protoc
/archives/netdev/2003-08/msg01328.html (9,649 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu