Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[PATCH\]\s+Use\s+the\s+incore\s+inode\s+size\s+in\s+xfs_file_readdir\(\)\s*$/: 12 ]

Total 12 documents matching your query.

1. [PATCH] Use the incore inode size in xfs_file_readdir() (score: 1)
Author: Lachlan McIlroy <lachlan@xxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 04 Dec 2008 17:59:08 +1100
We should be using the incore inode size here not the linux inode size. The incore inode size is always up to date for directories whereas the linux inode size is not updated for directories. We've h
/archives/xfs/2008-12/msg00126.html (8,018 bytes)

2. Re: [PATCH] Use the incore inode size in xfs_file_readdir() (score: 1)
Author: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 4 Dec 2008 02:08:27 -0500
Heh. Looks good, but you can still call ->readdir with a 0 inode size, so you might want to check for that (actualyl I think other pathes are goign to take care of it, but..)
/archives/xfs/2008-12/msg00129.html (8,105 bytes)

3. Re: [PATCH] Use the incore inode size in xfs_file_readdir() (score: 1)
Author: Lachlan McIlroy <lachlan@xxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 05 Dec 2008 14:22:55 +1100
/archives/xfs/2008-12/msg00175.html (8,796 bytes)

4. Re: [PATCH] Use the incore inode size in xfs_file_readdir() (score: 1)
Author: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 17 Dec 2008 09:20:28 -0500
/archives/xfs/2008-12/msg00364.html (8,983 bytes)

5. [PATCH] Use the incore inode size in xfs_file_readdir() (score: 1)
Author: Lachlan McIlroy <lachlan@xxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 04 Dec 2008 17:59:08 +1100
/archives/xfs/2008-12/msg00743.html (8,018 bytes)

6. Re: [PATCH] Use the incore inode size in xfs_file_readdir() (score: 1)
Author: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 4 Dec 2008 02:08:27 -0500
/archives/xfs/2008-12/msg00746.html (8,105 bytes)

7. Re: [PATCH] Use the incore inode size in xfs_file_readdir() (score: 1)
Author: Lachlan McIlroy <lachlan@xxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 05 Dec 2008 14:22:55 +1100
.
/archives/xfs/2008-12/msg00792.html (8,796 bytes)

8. Re: [PATCH] Use the incore inode size in xfs_file_readdir() (score: 1)
Author: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 17 Dec 2008 09:20:28 -0500
n
/archives/xfs/2008-12/msg00981.html (8,983 bytes)

9. [PATCH] Use the incore inode size in xfs_file_readdir() (score: 1)
Author: Lachlan McIlroy <lachlan@xxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 04 Dec 2008 17:59:08 +1100
We should be using the incore inode size here not the linux inode size. The incore inode size is always up to date for directories whereas the linux inode size is not updated for directories. We've h
/archives/xfs/2008-12/msg01360.html (7,911 bytes)

10. Re: [PATCH] Use the incore inode size in xfs_file_readdir() (score: 1)
Author: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 4 Dec 2008 02:08:27 -0500
Heh. Looks good, but you can still call ->readdir with a 0 inode size, so you might want to check for that (actualyl I think other pathes are goign to take care of it, but..)
/archives/xfs/2008-12/msg01363.html (8,153 bytes)

11. Re: [PATCH] Use the incore inode size in xfs_file_readdir() (score: 1)
Author: Lachlan McIlroy <lachlan@xxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 05 Dec 2008 14:22:55 +1100
Christoph Hellwig wrote: On Thu, Dec 04, 2008 at 05:59:08PM +1100, Lachlan McIlroy wrote: We should be using the incore inode size here not the linux inode size. The incore inode size is always up to
/archives/xfs/2008-12/msg01409.html (8,887 bytes)

12. Re: [PATCH] Use the incore inode size in xfs_file_readdir() (score: 1)
Author: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 17 Dec 2008 09:20:28 -0500
It is used for sizing a memory allocation in xfs_dir2_leaf_getdents, and avoiding over-allocations for small directories seems like a good idea. So please go ahead with your original patch.
/archives/xfs/2008-12/msg01598.html (9,085 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu