Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[PATCH\]\s+Tcp\s+port\s+selection\s+for\s+IPV6\.\s*$/: 8 ]

Total 8 documents matching your query.

1. Re: [PATCH] Tcp port selection for IPV6. (score: 1)
Author: xxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 8 Feb 2005 20:38:44 -0800
I've tossed this into my 2.6.12-pending tree.
/archives/netdev/2005-02/msg00279.html (7,885 bytes)

2. ep() (score: 1)
Author: Nishanth Aravamudan <nacc@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 20 Jan 2005 16:45:29 -0800
o be msecs and secs respectively. S
/archives/netdev/2005-01/msg00931.html (16,639 bytes)

3. ENOMEM (score: 1)
Author: shanth Aravamudan <nacc@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 20 Jan 2005 22:53:18 -0200
a way to work around the DMA issue
/archives/netdev/2005-01/msg00932.html (8,504 bytes)

4. (score: 1)
Author: ller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 25 Jan 2005 22:25:08 -0800
ny forthcoming xfrm dst work there.
/archives/netdev/2005-01/msg01145.html (8,279 bytes)

5. Re: [PATCH] Tcp port selection for IPV6. (score: 1)
Author: "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 8 Feb 2005 20:38:44 -0800
I've tossed this into my 2.6.12-pending tree.
/archives/netdev/2005-02/msg01299.html (8,003 bytes)

6. [PATCH] Tcp port selection for IPV6. (score: 1)
Author: Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@xxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 20 Jan 2005 16:45:29 -0800
This patch makes TCP over IPV6 select ports the same way the current TCPv4 code does. It uses a hash function to provide a starting offset and a free running counter to provide seed. This changes the
/archives/netdev/2005-01/msg02421.html (16,639 bytes)

7. Re: [PATCH] Tcp port selection for IPV6. (score: 1)
Author: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <arnaldo.melo@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 20 Jan 2005 22:53:18 -0200
Humm, dccp_hash_connect is almost identical to tcp_hash_connect too... /me adds an entry to his TODO list... :-) - Arnaldo
/archives/netdev/2005-01/msg02422.html (8,566 bytes)

8. Re: [PATCH] Tcp port selection for IPV6. (score: 1)
Author: "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 25 Jan 2005 22:25:08 -0800
Looks good, sorry for taking so long to review. I think I'll push this into my 2.6.12 pending queue since 2.6.11 is very much in a bug-fix-only type mode.
/archives/netdev/2005-01/msg02635.html (8,341 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu