Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[PATCH\]\s+Merge\s+p80211\s+to\s+ieee80211\s+subsystem\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[PATCH\]\s+Merge\s+p80211\s+to\s+ieee80211\s+subsystem\s*$/: 14 ]

Total 14 documents matching your query.

1. A new 10GB Ethernet Driver by Chelsio Communications (score: 1): Author: @xxxxxxxxx>; Date: Fri, 25 Mar 2005 16:55:52 +0800; This patch merged David Miller's p80211 (with Vladimir's modification) into the ieee80211 subsystem in wireless-2.6. This makes the ieee80211 code hook into the kernel as a true native network stack; /archives/netdev/2005-03/msg01405.html (98,309 bytes)
2. nications (score: 1): Author: garzik@xxxxxxxxx>; Date: Fri, 25 Mar 2005 04:10:21 -0500; It looks like your mailer word-wrapped the patch, making it impossible to apply. Evolution is, unfortunately, notorious for this. I recommend using the /usr/sbin/sendmail technique described in http:; /archives/netdev/2005-03/msg01406.html (8,739 bytes)
3. ystem (score: 1): Author: garzik@xxxxxxxxx>; Date: Fri, 25 Mar 2005 17:41:30 +0800 (CST); Resend patch. Signed-off-by: Zhu Yi <yi.zhu@xxxxxxxxx> include/linux/if_ether.h | 1 include/net/ieee80211.h | 144 ++++++-- net/ieee80211/Makefile | 6 net/ieee80211/ieee80211_crypt.c | 14 - net/ieee80; /archives/netdev/2005-03/msg01407.html (96,878 bytes)
4. icular oif, when the fib_lookup suggests another one. (score: 1): Author: xxxxxx>; Date: Sat, 26 Mar 2005 18:37:06 -0800; What takes care of variable length IEEE 802.11 headers? ieee80211_header() did not seem to have any code for WDS (4-address frames) and hard_header_len was set to 24. Even for IEEE 802.11 data frames; /archives/netdev/2005-03/msg01509.html (10,914 bytes)
5. cls_u32 compile failure in current 2.6.12-rc1+BK tree (score: 1): Author: geli <andrea@xxxxxxx>; Date: Mon, 28 Mar 2005 15:19:25 +0800; Hi Jouni! The ieee80211_header is supposed to do so, but it doesn't support WDS right now. Yeah, I need to add WDS to the TODO list. Handling EAP, EAPOL in the stack. With the native 802.11 stack, th; /archives/netdev/2005-03/msg01558.html (12,214 bytes)
6. n sch_api.c (score: 1): Author: xxxxx>; Date: Mon, 28 Mar 2005 06:53:34 -0800; Why would that be in kernel? I don't really see much point in moving things like TLS and user certificates, SIM card authentication, and so on into the kernel. wpa_supplicant does not encrypt or decr; /archives/netdev/2005-03/msg01588.html (11,233 bytes)
7. cls_u32 compile failure in current 2.6.12-rc1+BK tree (score: 1): Author: li <andrea@xxxxxxx>; Date: 28 Mar 2005 14:47:00 -0500; There is _absolutely_ no need to put this stuff in the kernel. It would be extremely rude to do so. Put it in user space - then you can interface it with Radius, LDAP etc. cheers, jamal; /archives/netdev/2005-03/msg01600.html (9,001 bytes)
8. [PATCH] Merge p80211 to ieee80211 subsystem (score: 1): Author: Zhu Yi <yi.zhu@xxxxxxxxx>; Date: Fri, 25 Mar 2005 16:55:52 +0800; Hi, This patch merged David Miller's p80211 (with Vladimir's modification) into the ieee80211 subsystem in wireless-2.6. This makes the ieee80211 code hook into the kernel as a true native network st; /archives/netdev/2005-03/msg03328.html (98,324 bytes)
9. Re: [PATCH] Merge p80211 to ieee80211 subsystem (score: 1): Author: Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@xxxxxxxxx>; Date: Fri, 25 Mar 2005 04:10:21 -0500; It looks like your mailer word-wrapped the patch, making it impossible to apply. Evolution is, unfortunately, notorious for this. I recommend using the /usr/sbin/sendmail technique described in http:; /archives/netdev/2005-03/msg03329.html (8,679 bytes)
10. Re: [PATCH] Merge p80211 to ieee80211 subsystem (score: 1): Author: "Zhu, Yi" <yi.zhu@xxxxxxxxx>; Date: Fri, 25 Mar 2005 17:41:30 +0800 (CST); Resend patch. Signed-off-by: Zhu Yi <yi.zhu@xxxxxxxxx> include/linux/if_ether.h | 1 include/net/ieee80211.h | 144 ++++++-- net/ieee80211/Makefile | 6 net/ieee80211/ieee80211_crypt.c | 14 - net/ieee80; /archives/netdev/2005-03/msg03330.html (96,878 bytes)
11. Re: [PATCH] Merge p80211 to ieee80211 subsystem (score: 1): Author: Jouni Malinen <jkmaline@xxxxxxxxx>; Date: Sat, 26 Mar 2005 18:37:06 -0800; What takes care of variable length IEEE 802.11 headers? ieee80211_header() did not seem to have any code for WDS (4-address frames) and hard_header_len was set to 24. Even for IEEE 802.11 data frames; /archives/netdev/2005-03/msg03432.html (10,980 bytes)
12. Re: [PATCH] Merge p80211 to ieee80211 subsystem (score: 1): Author: Zhu Yi <yi.zhu@xxxxxxxxx>; Date: Mon, 28 Mar 2005 15:19:25 +0800; Hi Jouni! The ieee80211_header is supposed to do so, but it doesn't support WDS right now. Yeah, I need to add WDS to the TODO list. Handling EAP, EAPOL in the stack. With the native 802.11 stack, th; /archives/netdev/2005-03/msg03481.html (12,305 bytes)
13. Re: [PATCH] Merge p80211 to ieee80211 subsystem (score: 1): Author: Jouni Malinen <jkmaline@xxxxxxxxx>; Date: Mon, 28 Mar 2005 06:53:34 -0800; Why would that be in kernel? I don't really see much point in moving things like TLS and user certificates, SIM card authentication, and so on into the kernel. wpa_supplicant does not encrypt or decr; /archives/netdev/2005-03/msg03511.html (11,363 bytes)
14. Re: [PATCH] Merge p80211 to ieee80211 subsystem (score: 1): Author: jamal <hadi@xxxxxxxxxx>; Date: 28 Mar 2005 14:47:00 -0500; There is _absolutely_ no need to put this stuff in the kernel. It would be extremely rude to do so. Put it in user space - then you can interface it with Radius, LDAP etc. cheers, jamal; /archives/netdev/2005-03/msg03523.html (9,155 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 14
Page: [1]