Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[PATCH\]\s+IPv6\s+MIB\:ipv6RouterAdvert\s+netlink\s+notification\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[PATCH\]\s+IPv6\s+MIB\:ipv6RouterAdvert\s+netlink\s+notification\s*$/: 24 ]

Total 24 documents matching your query.

1. [PATCH] IPv6 MIB:ipv6RouterAdvert netlink notification (score: 1): Author: @xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2004 15:52:51 -0800; Once receiving a router advertisement message, a netlink notification event will be created. This patch is against linux-2.6.1. Attachment: linux-2.6.1-ipv6mib8.patch Description: Text Data; /archives/netdev/2004-01/msg00253.html (9,562 bytes)
2. Re: [PATCH] IPv6 MIB:ipv6RouterAdvert netlink notification (score: 1): Author: vem@xxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2004 00:52:52 -0800; This patch looks fine, except I can't see how RTM_GETRA is used anywhere. Even if it will be used by some future change, please remove it until that later change is made. So please either show where; /archives/netdev/2004-01/msg00276.html (9,907 bytes)
3. Re: [PATCH] IPv6 MIB:ipv6RouterAdvert netlink notification (score: 1): Author: d S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2004 18:10:57 +0900 (JST); Hmm, why do we need this? What kind of usage? I think you can do this in user space by opening raw socket. --yoshfuji; /archives/netdev/2004-01/msg00282.html (10,273 bytes)
4. Re: [PATCH] IPv6 MIB:ipv6RouterAdvert netlink notification (score: 1): Author: x>; Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2004 14:31:47 -0800; This patch is going to be used by SNMP for ipv6RouterAdvert Table. I will remove this Micro, and resubmit the patch. Thanks Shirley Ma IBM Linux Technology Center 15300 SW Koll Parkway Beaverton, OR; /archives/netdev/2004-01/msg00325.html (10,197 bytes)
5. Re: [PATCH] IPv6 MIB:ipv6RouterAdvert netlink notification (score: 1): Author: xxxxx>; Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2004 15:04:26 -0800; This is the new patch for 2.6.1. Thanks Shirley Ma IBM Linux Technology Center Attachment: linux-2.6.1-ipv6mib8.patch Description: Text Data; /archives/netdev/2004-01/msg00327.html (9,776 bytes)
6. Re: [PATCH] IPv6 MIB:ipv6RouterAdvert netlink notification (score: 1): Author: m@xxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2004 15:04:41 -0800; Thanks Shirley, I'm applying this.; /archives/netdev/2004-01/msg00329.html (9,486 bytes)
7. Re: [PATCH] IPv6 MIB:ipv6RouterAdvert netlink notification (score: 1): Author: xxxxxxxx>; Date: Fri, 16 Jan 2004 10:37:10 +0900 (JST); This patch is conceptually wrong. I think you're misunderstanding the darft. ipv6RouterAdvertTable contains information used to create router advertisements on router. Not on host. Patch should be re; /archives/netdev/2004-01/msg00332.html (10,582 bytes)
8. Re: [PATCH] IPv6 MIB:ipv6RouterAdvert netlink notification (score: 1): Author: xxxxxxx>; Date: Fri, 16 Jan 2004 10:38:49 -0800; Thank Yoshfuji to point out. But the patch is still needed for the Router, so it should be put in ndisc_router_discovery() when it's determined as a router. Are you OK with that? Thanks Shirley Ma IB; /archives/netdev/2004-01/msg00340.html (10,548 bytes)
9. Re: [PATCH] IPv6 MIB:ipv6RouterAdvert netlink notification (score: 1): Author: >; Date: Sat, 17 Jan 2004 04:17:25 +0900 (JST); I don't understand why it is needed. radvd is respoinsible for those information. -- Hideaki YOSHIFUJI @ USAGI Project <yoshfuji@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> GPG FP: 9022 65EB 1ECF 3AD1 0BDF 80D8 4807 F894 E062 0; /archives/netdev/2004-01/msg00344.html (9,983 bytes)
10. Re: [PATCH] IPv6 MIB:ipv6RouterAdvert netlink notification (score: 1): Author: xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Fri, 16 Jan 2004 11:41:59 -0800; Yes. radvd should provide all these information. But radvd doesn't support this right now. I talked to someone who is patching SNMP to support new IP MIBs, he said it's better to support this through; /archives/netdev/2004-01/msg00346.html (10,791 bytes)
11. Re: [PATCH] IPv6 MIB:ipv6RouterAdvert netlink notification (score: 1): Author: k@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Fri, 16 Jan 2004 12:08:35 -0800; Yes, it does. One thing I want people to keep in mind in these discussions, while I understand the concerns being addressed and discussed, I think it would be somewhat rediculious for one to be requi; /archives/netdev/2004-01/msg00348.html (9,838 bytes)
12. Re: [PATCH] IPv6 MIB:ipv6RouterAdvert netlink notification (score: 1): Author: 吉藤英明 <yoshfuji@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Sat, 17 Jan 2004 05:23:48 +0900 (JST); Yes, netlink is one option and is possibly a good candidate. I believe netlink supports user-user communication and rtadvd can use it to provide information to other entities. I do not think netlink; /archives/netdev/2004-01/msg00349.html (10,496 bytes)
13. [PATCH] IPv6 MIB:ipv6RouterAdvert netlink notification (score: 1): Author: Shirley Ma <mashirle@xxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2004 15:52:51 -0800; Once receiving a router advertisement message, a netlink notification event will be created. This patch is against linux-2.6.1. Attachment: linux-2.6.1-ipv6mib8.patch Description: Text Data; /archives/netdev/2004-01/msg00961.html (9,818 bytes)
14. Re: [PATCH] IPv6 MIB:ipv6RouterAdvert netlink notification (score: 1): Author: "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2004 00:52:52 -0800; This patch looks fine, except I can't see how RTM_GETRA is used anywhere. Even if it will be used by some future change, please remove it until that later change is made. So please either show where; /archives/netdev/2004-01/msg00984.html (10,168 bytes)
15. Re: [PATCH] IPv6 MIB:ipv6RouterAdvert netlink notification (score: 1): Author: YOSHIFUJI Hideaki / <yoshfuji@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2004 18:10:57 +0900 (JST); Hmm, why do we need this? What kind of usage? I think you can do this in user space by opening raw socket. --yoshfuji; /archives/netdev/2004-01/msg00990.html (10,447 bytes)
16. Re: [PATCH] IPv6 MIB:ipv6RouterAdvert netlink notification (score: 1): Author: Shirley Ma <xma@xxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2004 14:31:47 -0800; This patch is going to be used by SNMP for ipv6RouterAdvert Table. I will remove this Micro, and resubmit the patch. Thanks Shirley Ma IBM Linux Technology Center 15300 SW Koll Parkway Beaverton, OR; /archives/netdev/2004-01/msg01033.html (10,197 bytes)
17. Re: [PATCH] IPv6 MIB:ipv6RouterAdvert netlink notification (score: 1): Author: Shirley Ma <mashirle@xxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2004 15:04:26 -0800; This is the new patch for 2.6.1. Thanks Shirley Ma IBM Linux Technology Center Attachment: linux-2.6.1-ipv6mib8.patch Description: Text Data; /archives/netdev/2004-01/msg01035.html (9,870 bytes)
18. Re: [PATCH] IPv6 MIB:ipv6RouterAdvert netlink notification (score: 1): Author: "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2004 15:04:41 -0800; Thanks Shirley, I'm applying this.; /archives/netdev/2004-01/msg01037.html (9,603 bytes)
19. Re: [PATCH] IPv6 MIB:ipv6RouterAdvert netlink notification (score: 1): Author: YOSHIFUJI Hideaki / <yoshfuji@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Fri, 16 Jan 2004 10:37:10 +0900 (JST); This patch is conceptually wrong. I think you're misunderstanding the darft. ipv6RouterAdvertTable contains information used to create router advertisements on router. Not on host. Patch should be re; /archives/netdev/2004-01/msg01040.html (10,676 bytes)
20. Re: [PATCH] IPv6 MIB:ipv6RouterAdvert netlink notification (score: 1): Author: Shirley Ma <xma@xxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Fri, 16 Jan 2004 10:38:49 -0800; Thank Yoshfuji to point out. But the patch is still needed for the Router, so it should be put in ndisc_router_discovery() when it's determined as a router. Are you OK with that? Thanks Shirley Ma IB; /archives/netdev/2004-01/msg01048.html (10,548 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 20
Page: [1] [2]