Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[PATCH\]\s+IPv6\s+MIB\:ipv6DefaultRouterTable\s*$/: 28 ]

Total 28 documents matching your query.

1. [PATCH] IPv6 MIB:ipv6DefaultRouterTable (score: 1)
Author: rle@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2004 16:22:09 -0800
This patch is agaist 2.6.1 kernel. Thanks Shirley Ma IBM Linux Technology Center Attachment: linux-2.6.1-ipv6mib7.patch Description: Text Data
/archives/netdev/2004-01/msg00258.html (9,396 bytes)

2. Re: [PATCH] IPv6 MIB:ipv6DefaultRouterTable (score: 1)
Author: vem@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2004 18:03:15 +0900 (JST)
Wrong. Do not change user interface. --yoshfuji
/archives/netdev/2004-01/msg00278.html (9,580 bytes)

3. Re: [PATCH] IPv6 MIB:ipv6DefaultRouterTable (score: 1)
Author: inger <shemminger@xxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2004 10:26:21 -0800
This is a bug fix for ipDefaultRouter Table. According to the new IP MIBs, the DefaultRouterLifeTime(expire) entry in this table is unsigned 32. It measures the remaining length of time in seconds. I
/archives/netdev/2004-01/msg00303.html (10,209 bytes)

4. Re: [PATCH] IPv6 MIB:ipv6DefaultRouterTable (score: 1)
Author: Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@xxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 16 Jan 2004 03:36:22 +0900 (JST)
Kernel does not have to provide MIB in as-is format. --yoshfuji
/archives/netdev/2004-01/msg00304.html (10,008 bytes)

5. Re: [PATCH] IPv6 MIB:ipv6DefaultRouterTable (score: 1)
Author: UJI Hideaki / 吉藤英明 <yoshfuji@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2004 11:09:47 -0800
But if no applications use this value, and nothing is boken. It's not harmful to change the kernel to provide MIBs in as-is format. Thanks Shirley Ma IBM Linux Technology Center 15300 SW Koll Parkwa
/archives/netdev/2004-01/msg00306.html (10,590 bytes)

6. Re: [PATCH] IPv6 MIB:ipv6DefaultRouterTable (score: 1)
Author: HIFUJI Hideaki / 吉藤英明 <yoshfuji@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 16 Jan 2004 04:19:50 +0900 (JST)
Shirley, nobody can prove that nothing will be broken. :-) --yoshfuji
/archives/netdev/2004-01/msg00308.html (9,848 bytes)

7. Re: [PATCH] IPv6 MIB:ipv6DefaultRouterTable (score: 1)
Author: xxx>
Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2004 11:30:25 -0800
This rule would mean that any new kernel development *could* break something somewhere else? ;-) I don't see any application uses these values for now, so I change them. It's good for kernel to prov
/archives/netdev/2004-01/msg00309.html (10,783 bytes)

8. Re: [PATCH] IPv6 MIB:ipv6DefaultRouterTable (score: 1)
Author: xxx>
Date: Fri, 16 Jan 2004 04:36:50 +0900 (JST)
ip -6 route ? --yoshfuji
/archives/netdev/2004-01/msg00310.html (10,028 bytes)

9. Re: [PATCH] IPv6 MIB:ipv6DefaultRouterTable (score: 1)
Author: / 吉藤英明 <yoshfuji@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2004 11:37:00 -0800
And also, the current situation is OK as long as this value we present now can be converted into the desired value. Is this the case?
/archives/netdev/2004-01/msg00311.html (10,233 bytes)

10. Re: [PATCH] IPv6 MIB:ipv6DefaultRouterTable (score: 1)
Author: xx>
Date: Fri, 16 Jan 2004 04:45:22 +0900 (JST)
Please try to avoid changing the interface as long as you can. Please add something rather change it. In these case, we can avoid changing the interface, so let's avoid breaking interface. For ipv6in
/archives/netdev/2004-01/msg00312.html (10,309 bytes)

11. Re: [PATCH] IPv6 MIB:ipv6DefaultRouterTable (score: 1)
Author: 吉藤英明 <yoshfuji@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2004 11:38:40 -0800
Format and layout of procfs files have to stay as they are, this is just the nature of the game. We can create new files to present information in new ways and formats, but I totally prefer using net
/archives/netdev/2004-01/msg00313.html (9,924 bytes)

12. Re: [PATCH] IPv6 MIB:ipv6DefaultRouterTable (score: 1)
Author: x>
Date: Fri, 16 Jan 2004 04:47:34 +0900 (JST)
I think so for the routing table AFAIK. For neighbours, "jiffies" is required to be exported. --yoshfuji
/archives/netdev/2004-01/msg00314.html (10,218 bytes)

13. Re: [PATCH] IPv6 MIB:ipv6DefaultRouterTable (score: 1)
Author: xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 16 Jan 2004 04:53:41 +0900 (JST)
Although this discussion is about rtnetlink message, problem will be solved if we provide jiffies for neigbours IMHO. --yoshfuji @ let me sleep...
/archives/netdev/2004-01/msg00317.html (9,921 bytes)

14. Re: [PATCH] IPv6 MIB:ipv6DefaultRouterTable (score: 1)
Author: <davem@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2004 11:59:49 -0800
OK, I agree with both of you. Then this patch is not needed. Yoshifuji, you can sleep in peace. ;-) Thank you all! Shirley Ma IBM Linux Technology Center 15300 SW Koll Parkway Beaverton, OR 97006-606
/archives/netdev/2004-01/msg00319.html (10,154 bytes)

15. [PATCH] IPv6 MIB:ipv6DefaultRouterTable (score: 1)
Author: Shirley Ma <mashirle@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2004 16:22:09 -0800
This patch is agaist 2.6.1 kernel. Thanks Shirley Ma IBM Linux Technology Center Attachment: linux-2.6.1-ipv6mib7.patch Description: Text Data
/archives/netdev/2004-01/msg00966.html (9,652 bytes)

16. Re: [PATCH] IPv6 MIB:ipv6DefaultRouterTable (score: 1)
Author: YOSHIFUJI Hideaki / <yoshfuji@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2004 18:03:15 +0900 (JST)
Wrong. Do not change user interface. --yoshfuji
/archives/netdev/2004-01/msg00986.html (9,778 bytes)

17. Re: [PATCH] IPv6 MIB:ipv6DefaultRouterTable (score: 1)
Author: Shirley Ma <xma@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2004 10:26:21 -0800
This is a bug fix for ipDefaultRouter Table. According to the new IP MIBs, the DefaultRouterLifeTime(expire) entry in this table is unsigned 32. It measures the remaining length of time in seconds. I
/archives/netdev/2004-01/msg01011.html (10,209 bytes)

18. Re: [PATCH] IPv6 MIB:ipv6DefaultRouterTable (score: 1)
Author: YOSHIFUJI Hideaki / <yoshfuji@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 16 Jan 2004 03:36:22 +0900 (JST)
Kernel does not have to provide MIB in as-is format. --yoshfuji
/archives/netdev/2004-01/msg01012.html (10,102 bytes)

19. Re: [PATCH] IPv6 MIB:ipv6DefaultRouterTable (score: 1)
Author: Shirley Ma <xma@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2004 11:09:47 -0800
Agree. But if no applications use this value, and nothing is boken. It's not harmful to change the kernel to provide MIBs in as-is format. Thanks Shirley Ma IBM Linux Technology Center 15300 SW Koll
/archives/netdev/2004-01/msg01014.html (10,590 bytes)

20. Re: [PATCH] IPv6 MIB:ipv6DefaultRouterTable (score: 1)
Author: YOSHIFUJI Hideaki / <yoshfuji@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 16 Jan 2004 04:19:50 +0900 (JST)
Shirley, nobody can prove that nothing will be broken. :-) --yoshfuji
/archives/netdev/2004-01/msg01016.html (9,942 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu