Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[PATCH\]\s+IPv6\:\s+Sysctl\s+for\s+ICMPv6\s+Rate\s+Limitation\s*$/: 12 ]

Total 12 documents matching your query.

1. Re: [RESEND] tuning linux for high network performance? (score: 1)
Author: ñ<bamex@xxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 24 Oct 2002 13:50:55 +0900 (JST)
t needs to be user -> kernel, then. any chance of using O_DIRECT to the socket? -- Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk, Datavaktmester ProntoTV AS - http://www.pronto.tv/
/archives/netdev/2002-10/msg00486.html (16,699 bytes)

2. rmance? (score: 1)
Author: ro Tortonesi <mauro@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 24 Oct 2002 08:50:25 +0300 (EEST)
onvenience to anyone, but I thought it may be of interest to some people on the netdev mailinglist as well. Just to inform people who may be interested, the
/archives/netdev/2002-10/msg00487.html (9,061 bytes)

3. ion (score: 1)
Author: xxx>
Date: Thu, 24 Oct 2002 14:55:51 +0900 (JST)
neric option, SO_ONEFAMILY, that would replace the need for IPV6_V6ONLY? RFC2553. (IPV6_V6ONLY Support) - Rev.2 /cvsroot/usagi/usagi-backport/linux24/Docume
/archives/netdev/2002-10/msg00488.html (9,351 bytes)

4. ion (score: 1)
Author: rzik <jgarzik@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 24 Oct 2002 08:59:16 +0300 (EEST)
only applicable to IPv4 and IPv6 (and badly even there), there is no use trying to generalize it -- the idea was discarded. -- Pekka Savola "Tell me of difficulties surmounted,
/archives/netdev/2002-10/msg00489.html (9,349 bytes)

5. 6: Sysctl for ICMPv6 Rate Limitation (score: 1)
Author: S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 24 Oct 2002 16:23:55 +0900 (JST)
kind of
/archives/netdev/2002-10/msg00491.html (10,689 bytes)

6. as [RESEND] tuning linux for high network performance?) (score: 1)
Author: shfuji@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: 24 Oct 2002 04:02:58 -0700
e checksum co
/archives/netdev/2002-10/msg00498.html (8,409 bytes)

7. [PATCH] IPv6: Sysctl for ICMPv6 Rate Limitation (score: 1)
Author: YOSHIFUJI Hideaki / <yoshfuji@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 24 Oct 2002 13:50:55 +0900 (JST)
Hi! This patch add sysctl for icmp6 rate limit. This patch is against 2.4.20-pre11 (see below). Thanks in advance. Note: This inlined patch conflicts with IPV6_V6ONLY patch. So, I attach another patc
/archives/netdev/2002-10/msg01097.html (16,699 bytes)

8. Re: [PATCH] IPv6: Sysctl for ICMPv6 Rate Limitation (score: 1)
Author: Pekka Savola <pekkas@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 24 Oct 2002 08:50:25 +0300 (EEST)
... Does this rate-limit all ICMPv6 packets or just ICMPv6 error messages (as specified in ICMPv6 specifications). If all, I believe the default of rate-limiting everything is unacceptable. Note that
/archives/netdev/2002-10/msg01098.html (9,102 bytes)

9. Re: [PATCH] IPv6: Sysctl for ICMPv6 Rate Limitation (score: 1)
Author: YOSHIFUJI Hideaki / <yoshfuji@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 24 Oct 2002 14:55:51 +0900 (JST)
This patch just adds sysctl. It is my documentation error... is s/ICMPv6 packets/ICMPv6 error packets/ ok? (I need to do s/100/HZ/, too; This also lives in ICMP(v4)). --yoshfuji
/archives/netdev/2002-10/msg01099.html (9,486 bytes)

10. Re: [PATCH] IPv6: Sysctl for ICMPv6 Rate Limitation (score: 1)
Author: Pekka Savola <pekkas@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 24 Oct 2002 08:59:16 +0300 (EEST)
That change fine with me, thanks. -- Pekka Savola "Tell me of difficulties surmounted, Netcore Oy not those you stumble over and fall" Systems. Networks. Security. -- Robert Jordan: A Crown of Swords
/archives/netdev/2002-10/msg01100.html (9,391 bytes)

11. Re: [PATCH] IPv6: Sysctl for ICMPv6 Rate Limitation (score: 1)
Author: YOSHIFUJI Hideaki / <yoshfuji@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 24 Oct 2002 16:23:55 +0900 (JST)
Please apply the following patch on top of the previous "Sysctl for ICMPv6 Rate Limitation" patch. Thanks. Index: Documentation/networking/ip-sysctl.txt == RCS file: /cvsroot/usagi/usagi-backport/lin
/archives/netdev/2002-10/msg01102.html (10,825 bytes)

12. Re: [PATCH] IPv6: Sysctl for ICMPv6 Rate Limitation (score: 1)
Author: "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: 24 Oct 2002 04:02:58 -0700
I've applied this patch to my 2.4.x and 2.5.x trees, thank you.
/archives/netdev/2002-10/msg01109.html (8,507 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu