Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[PATCH\]\s+Drop\s+ISA\s+dependencies\s+from\s+IRDA\s+drivers\s*$/: 30 ]

Total 30 documents matching your query.

1. [PATCH] Drop ISA dependencies from IRDA drivers (score: 1)
Author: xxxxxxx (Margit Schubert-While)
Date: Thu, 15 Jul 2004 18:39:21 +0200
http://bugme.osdl.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3077 Some IRDA chipsets currently don't work on x86-64, because they're dependent on CONFIG_ISA and x86-64 doesn't set this. CONFIG_ISA means real ISA slots, and
/archives/netdev/2004-07/msg00402.html (10,504 bytes)

2. Re: [PATCH] Drop ISA dependencies from IRDA drivers (score: 1)
Author: ens@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 15 Jul 2004 10:00:24 -0700
I was because those driver were using isa_virt_to_bus. I think we can drop that now, but I don't have the problematic architecture. Well, I guess we will learn soon enough :-( Feel free to send that
/archives/netdev/2004-07/msg00409.html (10,235 bytes)

3. Re: [PATCH] Drop ISA dependencies from IRDA drivers (score: 1)
Author: ak@xxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 15 Jul 2004 22:50:01 +0200
I don't think so. I did most of the original CONFIG_ISA annotations and I only added it to real ISA devices. And the LPC devices in southbridges are normally not marked CONFIG_ISA. There is great val
/archives/netdev/2004-07/msg00415.html (10,769 bytes)

4. Re: [PATCH] Drop ISA dependencies from IRDA drivers (score: 1)
Author: <bunk@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 15 Jul 2004 17:00:38 -0400
Andi Kleen wrote: On Thu, Jul 15, 2004 at 12:48:07PM -0400, Jeff Garzik wrote: And with legacy ISA devices still around, I don't see a whole lot of value in differentiating between "I have ISA slots"
/archives/netdev/2004-07/msg00416.html (10,779 bytes)

5. Re: [PATCH] Drop ISA dependencies from IRDA drivers (score: 1)
Author: ov <johnpol@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 15 Jul 2004 23:55:52 +0200
They should be already aware that most ISA drivers are just not maintained anymore and very likely broken. I doubt there is any bug hunter or maintainer who is not aware of this fact. There are no x8
/archives/netdev/2004-07/msg00417.html (13,462 bytes)

6. Re: [PATCH] Drop ISA dependencies from IRDA drivers (score: 1)
Author: >
Date: Thu, 15 Jul 2004 15:35:28 -0700
Andy, I never said that, please quote me accurately. I personally don't have strong opinions on whether those drivers should be tagged with CONFIG_ISA or not, but those hardware are definitely mapped
/archives/netdev/2004-07/msg00418.html (11,330 bytes)

7. Re: [PATCH] Drop ISA dependencies from IRDA drivers (score: 1)
Author: arzik@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 15 Jul 2004 15:42:35 -0700
irda_setup_dma was (supposedly) fixed in 2.6.8-rc1, and no longer depend on CONFIG_ISA. Those driver are supposed to work on 64 bits. Jean
/archives/netdev/2004-07/msg00419.html (11,594 bytes)

8. Re: [PATCH] Drop ISA dependencies from IRDA drivers (score: 1)
Author: @xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 16 Jul 2004 07:45:50 +0200
Hmm, good point. !64BIT is not needed - apparently they are 64bit clean. The reason I want to drop the CONFIG_ISA depency is that they *should* be built on x86-64 too. -Andi
/archives/netdev/2004-07/msg00425.html (10,948 bytes)

9. Re: [PATCH] Drop ISA dependencies from IRDA drivers (score: 1)
Author: kash_Gonella <Jayprakash_Gonella@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 16 Jul 2004 08:19:04 +0200 (CEST)
I think you are right - however, AFAICS this is not the point in this case. These drivers do DMA to legacy devices (call it ISA, LPC, whatever). The documented way for those devices without struct pc
/archives/netdev/2004-07/msg00429.html (10,580 bytes)

10. Re: [PATCH] Drop ISA dependencies from IRDA drivers (score: 1)
Author: a@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 16 Jul 2004 07:36:52 +0200
More likely on LPC interface. And not on a ISA slot. Anyways, if you want them to work on x86-64 you will have to drop that bogus dependency. I have no plans to ever define CONFIG_ISA on x86-64. -And
/archives/netdev/2004-07/msg00430.html (10,710 bytes)

11. Re: [PATCH] Drop ISA dependencies from IRDA drivers (score: 1)
Author: pranav@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 16 Jul 2004 08:19:13 +0200
There was at least one user report that at least one driver worked with CONFIG_ISA force defined. The old pci_alloc_coherent supported hwdev == NULL under x86-64. dma_alloc_consistent() should too. I
/archives/netdev/2004-07/msg00431.html (10,768 bytes)

12. Re: [PATCH] Drop ISA dependencies from IRDA drivers (score: 1)
Author:
Date: Thu, 15 Jul 2004 12:48:07 -0400
Andi Kleen wrote: http://bugme.osdl.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3077 Some IRDA chipsets currently don't work on x86-64, because they're dependent on CONFIG_ISA and x86-64 doesn't set this. CONFIG_ISA means r
/archives/netdev/2004-07/msg00432.html (10,096 bytes)

13. Re: [PATCH] Drop ISA dependencies from IRDA drivers (score: 1)
Author: @xxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 16 Jul 2004 00:57:59 +0200 (CEST)
Ok, so maybe the following is missing in addition to Andi's patch? Martin -- -- linux-2.6.8-rc1/net/irda/irda_device.c Tue Jul 13 00:31:34 2004 +++ v2.6.8-rc1-md/net/irda/irda_device.c Fri Jul 16 00:
/archives/netdev/2004-07/msg00450.html (10,027 bytes)

14. Re: [PATCH] Drop ISA dependencies from IRDA drivers (score: 1)
Author: x>
Date: Fri, 16 Jul 2004 00:32:44 +0200 (CEST)
Admittedly I haven't tried either, but I'm pretty sure this patch will break building those drivers because they are calling irda_setup_dma - which is CONFIG_ISA. Maybe this can be dropped but I don'
/archives/netdev/2004-07/msg00454.html (10,139 bytes)

15. Re: [PATCH] Drop ISA dependencies from IRDA drivers (score: 1)
Author: xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 16 Jul 2004 08:33:45 +0200 (CEST)
Ok, thanks. This sounds like the right solution. I think most/all functions in include/asm-generic/dma-mapping.h are not prepared to accept dev=NULL parameters, so it's a bit more than just dma_alloc
/archives/netdev/2004-07/msg00455.html (9,501 bytes)

16. [PATCH] Drop ISA dependencies from IRDA drivers (score: 1)
Author: Andi Kleen <ak@xxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 15 Jul 2004 18:39:21 +0200
http://bugme.osdl.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3077 Some IRDA chipsets currently don't work on x86-64, because they're dependent on CONFIG_ISA and x86-64 doesn't set this. CONFIG_ISA means real ISA slots, and
/archives/netdev/2004-07/msg01218.html (10,519 bytes)

17. Re: [PATCH] Drop ISA dependencies from IRDA drivers (score: 1)
Author: Jean Tourrilhes <jt@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 15 Jul 2004 10:00:24 -0700
I was because those driver were using isa_virt_to_bus. I think we can drop that now, but I don't have the problematic architecture. Well, I guess we will learn soon enough :-( Feel free to send that
/archives/netdev/2004-07/msg01225.html (10,332 bytes)

18. Re: [PATCH] Drop ISA dependencies from IRDA drivers (score: 1)
Author: Andi Kleen <ak@xxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 15 Jul 2004 22:50:01 +0200
I don't think so. I did most of the original CONFIG_ISA annotations and I only added it to real ISA devices. And the LPC devices in southbridges are normally not marked CONFIG_ISA. There is great val
/archives/netdev/2004-07/msg01231.html (10,854 bytes)

19. Re: [PATCH] Drop ISA dependencies from IRDA drivers (score: 1)
Author: Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 15 Jul 2004 17:00:38 -0400
Andi Kleen wrote: On Thu, Jul 15, 2004 at 12:48:07PM -0400, Jeff Garzik wrote: And with legacy ISA devices still around, I don't see a whole lot of value in differentiating between "I have ISA slots"
/archives/netdev/2004-07/msg01232.html (10,955 bytes)

20. Re: [PATCH] Drop ISA dependencies from IRDA drivers (score: 1)
Author: Andi Kleen <ak@xxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 15 Jul 2004 23:55:52 +0200
They should be already aware that most ISA drivers are just not maintained anymore and very likely broken. I doubt there is any bug hunter or maintainer who is not aware of this fact. There are no x8
/archives/netdev/2004-07/msg01233.html (13,585 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu