Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[PATCH\]\s+Break\s+\'budget\'\s+dependency\s+on\s+netdev_max

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[PATCH\]\s+Break\s+\'budget\'\s+dependency\s+on\s+netdev_max_backlog\.\s*$/: 24 ]

Total 24 documents matching your query.

1. [PATCH] Break 'budget' dependency on netdev_max_backlog. (score: 1): Author: xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Sun, 20 Oct 2002 23:46:50 -0700; ver the in-kern; /archives/netdev/2002-10/msg00364.html (11,530 bytes)
2. Re: [PATCH] Break 'budget' dependency on netdev_max_backlog. (score: 1): Author: Greear <greearb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2002 08:51:46 -0400 (EDT); ulip-20020915 N; /archives/netdev/2002-10/msg00370.html (12,534 bytes)
3. Re: [PATCH] Break 'budget' dependency on netdev_max_backlog. (score: 1): Author: xxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2002 09:25:52 -0700; rectly with thi; /archives/netdev/2002-10/msg00379.html (9,698 bytes)
4. �ージをたくさんの方へ見てもらえる方法 (score: 1): Author: Princess Rose Ike" <roseike98@xxxxxxx>; Date: Tue, 22 Oct 2002 20:47:19 -0400 (EDT); ��하세요. 회사소개 | 광고문의 | 개인정보보호정책 | 이용약관교환/반품 규정안내 Copyright (c)2002 K-Richmall All rights reserved. Email: richmall@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx ☎ Tel : 053-814-0383 / Fax : 053-817-; /archives/netdev/2002-10/msg00414.html (9,549 bytes)
5. so? (score: 1): Author: 200oramd@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <mdsk25200oramd@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Tue, 22 Oct 2002 18:06:13 -0700; �� 확인해 보세요! 무조건 성인만 입장하세요~ http://sexsexok.com 서울시 동대문구 신설동 230-53번지 3층 섹스섹스오케이닷컴 정보통신부 권고 사항에 의거 제목에 [성인광고]라고 표기한 성인광고 메일입니다. 수신을 원; /archives/netdev/2002-10/msg00417.html (11,708 bytes)
6. i-diag output) (score: 1): Author: xxxxxx>; Date: Tue, 22 Oct 2002 21:18:40 -0400 (EDT); 사항에 의거 제목에 [광고]라고 표기한 광고 메일입니다. 수신을 원치 않으시면 수신거부를 눌러주세요 . &nbs p; &n bsp; &nbs p; Reject/Remove 이 정보는 청소년 유해매체물로서 정보통신망 이용촉진 및 정보보호등에 관한 법률 및 청소년 보호법의 규정에 의하여 19세 미만의 청소년이 이용할수 없습니다. 미성년자 또는; /archives/netdev/2002-10/msg00422.html (9,617 bytes)
7. log. (score: 1): Author: reearb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Tue, 22 Oct 2002 19:37:02 -0700; 년자 또는; /archives/netdev/2002-10/msg00424.html (10,361 bytes)
8. put) (score: 1): Author: W Damasio <felipewd@xxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Tue, 22 Oct 2002 23:21:08 -0400 (EDT); that useful. For some reason i thought you were introducing NET_CORE_DEV_WEIGHT which happens to already exist with default value of 64. The value; /archives/netdev/2002-10/msg00427.html (9,242 bytes)
9. PATCH] Break 'budget' dependency on netdev_max_backlog. (score: 1): Author: xxxxxxxx>; Date: Tue, 22 Oct 2002 20:43:00 -0700; adi/patches Id rather not tell you since we are still evaluating its usefullness and it may not be there next week. Anyways, i put a patched drive; /archives/netdev/2002-10/msg00428.html (11,157 bytes)
10. on netdev_max_backlog. (score: 1): Author: hockin@xxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Tue, 22 Oct 2002 23:44:35 -0400 (EDT); �� 혐오감이 있으신 분은 바로 삭제하여 주십시오. 더 이상 말이 필요 없습니다. 일단 클릭하세요. 새로운 새상이 펼쳐집니다. 본 웹사이트는 인터넷 성인 전문 포르노 사이트로, 법적으로 이러한 내용을 열람할 수 없는 만 20세의 연령 미만이나 이와같은 음란한 내용에; /archives/netdev/2002-10/msg00430.html (9,752 bytes)
11. PATCH] Break 'budget' dependency on netdev_max_backlog. (score: 1): Author: reear <greearb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Tue, 22 Oct 2002 21:00:59 -0700; 인 전문 포르노 사이트로, 법적으로 이러한 내용을 열람할 수 없는 만 20세의 연령 미만이나 이와같은 음란한 내용에; /archives/netdev/2002-10/msg00431.html (10,036 bytes)
12. PATCH] Break 'budget' dependency on netdev_max_backlog. (score: 1): Author: d Becker <becker@xxxxxxxxx>; Date: Tue, 22 Oct 2002 23:58:27 -0400 (EDT); wrote: jamal wrote: Patch looks fine except for the 300 number. What are you smoking? Please retain the original value. The original value was 300, what d; /archives/netdev/2002-10/msg00432.html (8,973 bytes)
13. [PATCH] Break 'budget' dependency on netdev_max_backlog. (score: 1): Author: Ben Greear <greearb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Sun, 20 Oct 2002 23:46:50 -0700; I want to have a very high netdev_max_backlog, but that makes NAPI with the tulip driver (and 4 running ports) drop packets, I assume because by the time it polls the first 3, the 4th has been neglec; /archives/netdev/2002-10/msg00975.html (11,248 bytes)
14. Re: [PATCH] Break 'budget' dependency on netdev_max_backlog. (score: 1): Author: jamal <hadi@xxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2002 08:51:46 -0400 (EDT); Patch looks fine except for the 300 number. What are you smoking? Please retain the original value. cheers, jamal; /archives/netdev/2002-10/msg00981.html (12,601 bytes)
15. Re: [PATCH] Break 'budget' dependency on netdev_max_backlog. (score: 1): Author: Ben Greear <greearb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2002 09:25:52 -0700; The original value was 300, what do you want it to be? (Check out what backlog defaults to, that is what is currently used for the budget, in 2.4.20-pre9 at least.) Ben -- Ben Greear <greearb@xxxxxxx; /archives/netdev/2002-10/msg00990.html (9,667 bytes)
16. Re: [PATCH] Break 'budget' dependency on netdev_max_backlog. (score: 1): Author: jamal <hadi@xxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Tue, 22 Oct 2002 20:47:19 -0400 (EDT); Ok, i take back what i said then. Your patch is not that useful. For some reason i thought you were introducing NET_CORE_DEV_WEIGHT which happens to already exist with default value of 64. The value; /archives/netdev/2002-10/msg01025.html (9,573 bytes)
17. Re: [PATCH] Break 'budget' dependency on netdev_max_backlog. (score: 1): Author: Ben Greear <greearb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Tue, 22 Oct 2002 18:06:13 -0700; Patch looks fine except for the 300 number. What are you smoking? Please retain the original value. The original value was 300, what do you want it to be? Ok, i take back what i said then. Your patc; /archives/netdev/2002-10/msg01028.html (11,612 bytes)
18. Re: [PATCH] Break 'budget' dependency on netdev_max_backlog. (score: 1): Author: jamal <hadi@xxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Tue, 22 Oct 2002 21:18:40 -0400 (EDT); The 300 is shared amongst all the drivers which have something on their rx DMA. This is done on a roundrobin fashion. Also all the drivers which are non-napi are given the same quota. I think you mis; /archives/netdev/2002-10/msg01033.html (9,641 bytes)
19. Re: [PATCH] Break 'budget' dependency on netdev_max_backlog. (score: 1): Author: Ben Greear <greearb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Tue, 22 Oct 2002 19:37:02 -0700; I think you misunderstood. Look at the dev->weight. Yep, I was definately confused. I don't see how changing the value as I did could affect anything in a good way, but I definately saw changes in d; /archives/netdev/2002-10/msg01035.html (10,257 bytes)
20. Re: [PATCH] Break 'budget' dependency on netdev_max_backlog. (score: 1): Author: jamal <hadi@xxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Tue, 22 Oct 2002 23:21:08 -0400 (EDT); tulip hardcodes it; net/core/dev.c::weight_p is supposed to be the general one and is proc settable via NET_CORE_DEV_WEIGHT; only problem is that is not shadowed by the devices. I am not sure if ioct; /archives/netdev/2002-10/msg01038.html (9,266 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 20
Page: [1] [2]