Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[PATCH\]\s+Add\s+SOCK_SEQPACKET\s+to\s+PF

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[PATCH\]\s+Add\s+SOCK_SEQPACKET\s+to\s+PF_UNIX\s+protocol\s+family\s*$/: 10 ]

Total 10 documents matching your query.

1. [PATCH] Add SOCK_SEQPACKET to PF_UNIX protocol family (score: 1): Author: vid S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Sat, 28 Feb 2004 00:19:23 -0700; Attached is a patch which adds SOCK_SEQPACKET to the PF_UNIX protocol family. It doesn't seem to break SOCK_STREAM or SOCK_DGRAM for PF_UNIX and adds the desired functionality. I could find alot of; /archives/netdev/2004-02/msg00705.html (8,748 bytes)
2. Re: [PATCH] Add SOCK_SEQPACKET to PF_UNIX protocol family (score: 1): Author: <shemminger@xxxxxxxx>; Date: Sat, 28 Feb 2004 16:14:05 -0800; This looks fine to me, patch applied.; /archives/netdev/2004-02/msg00712.html (7,862 bytes)
3. Re: [PATCH] Add SOCK_SEQPACKET to PF_UNIX protocol family (score: 1): Author: <A.Verweij2@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Sun, 29 Feb 2004 03:36:30 +0100; I would suggest you submit a patch for the unix(7) man page to the maintainer too, now that DaveM has accepted it. Otherwise users cannot know that it exists. -Andi; /archives/netdev/2004-02/msg00713.html (7,899 bytes)
4. Re: [PATCH] Add SOCK_SEQPACKET to PF_UNIX protocol family (score: 1): Author: xx>; Date: Sat, 28 Feb 2004 22:04:07 -0700; I see you are the author of the unix(7) manpage. Should I submit the change to you or do you know the maintainer? If your the maintainer, could you tell me where your latest version is so I can base; /archives/netdev/2004-02/msg00714.html (8,810 bytes)
5. Re: [PATCH] Add SOCK_SEQPACKET to PF_UNIX protocol family (score: 1): Author: >; Date: Sun, 29 Feb 2004 11:50:09 +0100; The current maintainer is Andries Brouwer (aeb@xxxxxx). Submit it to him. Latest version is in the manpages tarball somewhere on ftp.kernel.org -Andi; /archives/netdev/2004-02/msg00716.html (8,401 bytes)
6. [PATCH] Add SOCK_SEQPACKET to PF_UNIX protocol family (score: 1): Author: Steven Dake <scd@xxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Sat, 28 Feb 2004 00:19:23 -0700; Folks, Attached is a patch which adds SOCK_SEQPACKET to the PF_UNIX protocol family. It doesn't seem to break SOCK_STREAM or SOCK_DGRAM for PF_UNIX and adds the desired functionality. I could find al; /archives/netdev/2004-02/msg01446.html (8,748 bytes)
7. Re: [PATCH] Add SOCK_SEQPACKET to PF_UNIX protocol family (score: 1): Author: "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Sat, 28 Feb 2004 16:14:05 -0800; This looks fine to me, patch applied.; /archives/netdev/2004-02/msg01453.html (7,928 bytes)
8. Re: [PATCH] Add SOCK_SEQPACKET to PF_UNIX protocol family (score: 1): Author: Andi Kleen <ak@xxxxxxx>; Date: Sun, 29 Feb 2004 03:36:30 +0100; I would suggest you submit a patch for the unix(7) man page to the maintainer too, now that DaveM has accepted it. Otherwise users cannot know that it exists. -Andi; /archives/netdev/2004-02/msg01454.html (7,965 bytes)
9. Re: [PATCH] Add SOCK_SEQPACKET to PF_UNIX protocol family (score: 1): Author: Steven Dake <scd@xxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Sat, 28 Feb 2004 22:04:07 -0700; Andi I see you are the author of the unix(7) manpage. Should I submit the change to you or do you know the maintainer? If your the maintainer, could you tell me where your latest version is so I can; /archives/netdev/2004-02/msg01455.html (8,911 bytes)
10. Re: [PATCH] Add SOCK_SEQPACKET to PF_UNIX protocol family (score: 1): Author: Andi Kleen <ak@xxxxxxx>; Date: Sun, 29 Feb 2004 11:50:09 +0100; The current maintainer is Andries Brouwer (aeb@xxxxxx). Submit it to him. Latest version is in the manpages tarball somewhere on ftp.kernel.org -Andi; /archives/netdev/2004-02/msg01457.html (8,530 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 10
Page: [1]